CMR is the leading provider of funding and management support for small to medium-sized businesses and entrepreneurs 

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Vienna, once hailed as one of Europe’s safest capitals, is grappling with a wave of violent crimes linked to unchecked migration, alongside a deepening crisis in schools where German is becoming a minority language. 

Parents are fleeing public education, random assaults are making headlines, and the city’s demographic fabric is unraveling under policies that prioritize open borders over citizen safety.

This is the predictable fallout from years of mass immigration without real integration, turning neighborhoods into hotspots for brutality and cultural clashes.

In a shocking case, a 22-year-old Pakistani national has been sentenced to life in a “forensic therapeutic center,” rather than prison, after beating a random 27-year-old man to death in Vienna’s Favoriten district and filming it. The attack, unprovoked, left the victim, who suffered from schizophrenia, motionless on the asphalt after being pushed against a fence and kicked repeatedly.

Court footage showed the defendant delivering fatal blows to the blood-soaked victim. When confronted, the Pakistani man stated without emotion: “I can’t say anything about that.” 

Additional videos on his phone revealed assaults on homeless individuals, described by psychiatrist Peter Hofmann as “trophies” indicating a “desire for the exercise of power and murder.” Hofmann noted, “There is zero empathy for the victims.”

The man’s lawyer, Werner Tomanek, admitted: “this exceeds some limits, even for us as criminal defense attorneys. To sugarcoat or downplay a defense in the sense of anything is completely inappropriate here.” 

Diagnosed with narcissistic-sadistic personality disorder, the perpetrator avoided high-security prison due to his “sadist” label, instead heading to a center with perks like sports and education.

Austria: Sadist Pakistani national sentenced to ‘therapeutic center’ after beating random victim to death on the streets of Vienna and filming it.https://t.co/STfw63PRx0 pic.twitter.com/pE05DJJcLu

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) February 27, 2026

In a separate incident, a naked 25-year-old Sudanese man was arrested for stabbing a 35-year-old in Vienna’s Märzpark with scissors during an unprovoked altercation. 

The victim, sitting with his girlfriend, was treated for non-life-threatening injuries. Police reported: “The injured person was treated by Vienna’s professional rescue service and taken to a hospital. His injuries are not life-threatening.”

Naked Sudanese man arrested for violent scissor attack in Vienna park.https://t.co/sx902HIY58 pic.twitter.com/2nHPr0e6mL

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) February 27, 2026

These attacks align with a pattern, including a stabbing after a man asked migrant teens to lower music, where Syrian and Iraqi youths assaulted and spat on him. 

Broader Austrian stats reveal a 3900% surge in Syrian youth crime suspects over a decade, from 25 to over 1,000.

Crime stats in the country have also confirmed that nearly 47% of suspects are foreigners, with Syrians up 30%. Interior Minister Gerhard Karner noted: “The number of complaints by Syrian suspects stands out.”

In another separate case, a “well-integrated” 27-year-old Afghan was imprisoned for brutally raping a 17-year-old, choking her and filming the act after she rejected his advances. He blamed cocaine, claiming it “makes him aggressive.”

In another case seven youths with migrant backgrounds were charged for raping, blackmailing a teacher, torching her house, and beheading an animal on video. Prosecutors say they leveraged consensual sex with a minor into months of abuse, forcing drugs and payments.

In another horrific case, a 14-year-old girl’s body was found in an Afghan refugee’s home, suspected drugged and raped before overdosing.

Pools in Austria have become flashpoints too, with reports of sexual assaults on underage girls, including a 16-year-old surrounded by Bulgarian men at  in Vienna. Her mother said: “My heart sank,” after seeing her daughter hysterical. The victim noted: “They’re about the same age as me – weird and perverted.”

Parents are also pulling kids from Vienna’s public schools amid a language meltdown. One mother transferred her daughter after two years in Rudolfsheim-Fünfhaus, where only four children spoke German fluently. 

She said teachers spent lessons translating, leaving her child unable to recite the alphabet. “I felt my child was being strongly influenced,” after cultural pressures like avoiding pork or certain clothing.

‘Only four children spoke German!’ — Austrian parents are pulling kids out of state schools as language crisis deepens.https://t.co/Cm1t9TKwpg pic.twitter.com/xIzEwudQ5r

— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) February 27, 2026

In Graz, a principal reported: “We have four or five out of 170 children with German as their first language.” Around 80 percent are Muslim, sparking tensions over sex education and symbols like Christmas trees.

Ministry data shows 46,385 pupils unable to follow lessons due to poor German, prompting FPÖ’s Hermann Brückl to warn: “German is becoming a foreign language in our own classrooms.” He called it a “full-blown educational emergency.”

This ties to accusations of refugees failing German courses deliberately to stay on benefits, avoiding low-wage jobs. A Syrian woman criticized pushing qualified migrants into cleaning roles, claiming some fail exams on purpose.

Vienna’s shifts reflect broader changes: Refugee women have nearly triple the birth rate of natives—3.3 versus 1.22 children. 

Shocking data reveals massive transformation, with one-third of primary pupils non-native German speakers, over 80% in some districts.

For the first time, Muslim students outnumber Christians in schools at 41.2%, fueling warnings of “displacement.” FPÖ’s Maximilian Weinzierl said: “This is no longer immigration, this is displacement.”

Austrian MEP Harald Vilimsky warns Europe risks becoming “a second Arabia or Africa” without halting this. 

As Austria spirals, it’s a stark reminder: Open borders erode safety and identity, demanding borders-first policies to reclaim Europe’s future.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Authored by Andrew Korybko via substack,

Authorities in Russia believe that Ukraine has quick access to Russian servicemen’s messages and exploits this for military purposes, which wouldn’t be possible without some degree of complicity on Telegram’s part, thus impugning its founder’s character after he denied working with foreign spooks.

The FSB claimed to have “reliable information that the Ukrainian armed forces and intelligence agencies are able to quickly obtain information posted on the Telegram messenger and use it for military purposes.” This coincides with the government allegedly throttling Telegram on the grounds that it’s not in compliance with local laws, which preceded reports that it’ll be banned on 1 April. The authorities denied that they have nay such plan but there’s no doubt that Telegram is now controversial in Russia.

Speculation about Ukraine’s access to the messages sent by Russian servicemen on that platform, which the FSB also touched upon in their two-sentence press release, is credible in light of founder Pavel Durov’s brief detention by the French authorities in 2024. Although he vehemently denied that he cut a deal with them for granting their authorities access to certain users’ messages and has since accused them of askingz him to ban conservative Romanian accounts, he might be lying and it could all be an act.

After all, criticizing the French authorities in the aftermath of his scandalous detainment could be meant to convince observers that he didn’t cut a deal with them even though he might have, or he could at least have been coerced by the American ones to that end or even voluntarily decided to help the Ukrainian ones. In any case, however it ended up happening, the FSB arguably does indeed believe that Ukraine has access to Russian servicemen’s messages and uses them for military purposes.

It would therefore be best for them to speedily replace Telegram with Russia’s Max messenger app instead, which was developed for strengthening Russia’s “digital sovereignty”. That concept refers to the trend of countries asserting their sovereignty in this sphere through regulations like banning certain sites like Russia banned Facebook, Twitter/X, and others for non-compliance with local legislation and creating their own alternatives that can’t be exploited by their adversaries. It’s a sensible policy in today’s world.

In fact, so sensible is it that some cynics speculate that the pressure that Telegram has recently come under in Russia is part of the state’s campaign to get citizens to use Max, but that still doesn’t discredit the FSB’s claim about Ukraine having quick access to Russian servicemen’s messages. Telegram is used by many of them to communicate with each other as well as by many Russian businesses to engage with their clients. It’s also a useful channel for sharing facts about Russian policy with the rest of the world.

Even in the scenario of Russia banning Telegram, it could still be used with a VPN just like Facebook, Twitter/X, and other banned sites are, which the FSB obviously knows and thus challenges the cynical speculation that it might be lying about the app as part of a ploy to get Russians to use Max instead. Accordingly, their claim about it being compromised by Ukraine is credible, and this in turn impugns Durov’s character since it wouldn’t be possible without some degree of complicity on his part.

Whatever Telegram’s fate in Russia may be, Russia and others are correct in doubting the integrity of that app and all foreign ones in general since there are credible reasons to believe that they’re exploited by adversarial intelligence agencies for hostile purposes. The solution is therefore creating national alternatives and getting citizens to use them instead for strengthening “digital sovereignty”. Some states might struggle with this, however, so their citizens would then have to choose the “lesser (foreign) evil”.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT.) is rolling out yet another exercise in class-warfare fantasy legislation on Monday, this time a proposal to extract a staggering $4.4 trillion from the nation's roughly 1,000 billionaires through an annual 5 percent annual wealth tax, according to The Washington Post.

The bill will be introduced in the House by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), a co-chair of Sanders’s 2020 campaign and a vocal supporter of California’s own billionaire-tax scheme. The funds would be funneled into a familiar laundry list of progressive wish items - including $3,000 cash payments to Americans earning under $150,000 annually, a $60,000 minimum salary for every public-school teacher, and an expansion of Medicare to include dental, vision, and hearing coverage, along with other big-government expansions, according to the Post.

“In a democratic society, we can no longer tolerate a rigged economy where so few have so much while so many have so little,” Sanders said in a statement obtained by the Post. "This revenue would be used to substantially improve the lives of the American people and address some of the major crises facing working families.”

"The billionaire class no longer sees itself as part of American society. They see themselves as something separate and apart, like the oligarchs of the 18th century, the kings and the queens and the czars, they believe they have the divine right to rule and are no longer subject to democratic governance,” he added.

The bill echoes the Vermont socialist’s 2020 campaign pitch, when he floated a progressive wealth tax starting at 1 percent on fortunes above roughly $32 million for couples and climbing to 8 percent above $10 billion, projected then to raise about $4.35 trillion over a decade to bankroll Medicare for All, housing, childcare, and the rest of the socialist wishlist.

Sanders’ push for more taxes on billionaires comes as California is actively debating its own wealth-tax proposal targeting billionaires, including levies on unrealized gains, a plan that has already sent shockwaves through Silicon Valley. As we previously reported, Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin ditched California for the business-friendly state of Florida, while Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg did the same, shelling out $150 million for a Miami mansion.

Even Reid Hoffman, LinkedIn co-founder, major Democratic donor, and longtime Jeffrey Epstein associate, has broken ranks to call California’s billionaire tax a “horrendous idea” that would accelerate the flight of tech founders and executives from the state.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), who is viewed as a top 2028 candidate in Democrat and Republican circles, says he hates the proposals too.

"This will be defeated - there’s no question in my mind," Newsom said last month. "I’ll do what I have to do to protect the state."