CMR is the leading provider of funding and management support for small to medium-sized businesses and entrepreneurs 

Gunboat diplomacy was on full display Wednesday afternoon after Bloomberg reported that U.S. forces intercepted and seized a sanctioned Venezuelan oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela. This move underscores the Trump administration's Monroe-2.0 posturing as Washington seeks to reassert control over the Western Hemisphere after years of neglect.

Bloomberg cited sources who did not disclose the tanker's name or the general area where U.S. military forces seized the vessel.

The move here is a foreign policy tactic known as gunboat diplomacy. It's where the U.S. military has stationed warships, jets, bombers, and troops that are to push the Maduro regime into complying with U.S. demands.

On Tuesday, Trump told Politico that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's "days are numbered" ...

Trump was asked whether the U.S. could send in troops on the ground. The president said, "I don't comment on that."

"I wouldn't say that one way or the other," he said, going on to criticize Maduro.

Polymarket odds for "US x Venezuela military engagement by March 31, 2026" surged on the news...

Simultaneously, the Pentagon has ramped up strikes on drug-trafficking vessels in waters near Venezuela and Colombia, killing at least 80 in the process. The Trump administration is hell-bent on dismantling the command-and-control structures of narco-trafficking routes that funnel illicit drugs into the U.S. and have contributed to the drug-death catastrophe that kills 100,000 Americans per year.

*Developing...

Tl;dr: The FOMC cut rates by 25bps to 3.50-3.75% as expected, with a 9-3 vote split; Miran sought a 50bps cut, while Goolsbee and Schmid preferred no change.

• It reiterated data dependence, signalling further adjustments will hinge on the evolving outlook, labor market conditions, inflation dynamics, expectations, and global and financial developments.

• Policy guidance was tweaked, changing the the phrase "in considering additional adjustments'' becomes "in considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments."

• In its updated Statement of Economic Projections (SEP), the Fed Funds projections were essentially unchanged, signalling steady expectations for a gradual return toward the longer-run rate. However, the 2025 dot plot composition shows six members' projected rates at the end of 2025 at 3.75-4.00%, indicating that four non-voters would have voted to keep rates on hold at today's meeting if they had voting rights.

• The Fed noted slower job gains and a slight rise in unemployment through September. Compared with October, the December statement updates the labor-market reference by replacing "the unemployment rate has edged up but remained low through August" with “the unemployment rate has edged up through September." Unemployment forecasts are only marginally firmer in the out-years, suggesting a more resilient labor market.

• Inflation has increased since earlier in the year and remains somewhat elevated. Core PCE expectations have eased modestly, indicating a marginally softer inflation path and slightly more confidence in disinflation over the forecast horizon.

• Economic activity is described as expanding at a moderate pace, with uncertainty around the outlook still high and downside risks to employment having risen recently. The December SEP projects a stronger increase in 2026 GDP compared to the Sept SEP.

• The Fed said reserve balances have declined to ample levels and will use shorter-term Treasury purchases when needed to maintain sufficient reserves. October's balance-sheet guidance, "the Committee decided to conclude the reduction of its aggregate securities holdings on December 1" is removed; instead, December adds new guidance: “the Committee judges that reserve balances have declined to ample levels and will initiate purchases of shorter-term Treasury securities as needed to maintain an ample supply of reserves."

* * *

Since the last FOMC meeting (on October 29th), The Fed has largely been flying blind from a macro data perspective (thanks to the government shutdown) with the sporadic 'hard' data outperforming while 'soft' data has shit the bed and alternative labor market insights remain mixed at best (and extremely lagged at worst)...

Source: Bloomberg

Interestingly, it is labor market data that has 'outperformed' since the last FOMC (so the hawks have a point) while surveys and inflation data has faded (doves can point to)...

Source: Bloomberg

Gold has been the biggest gainer since the last FOMC as bonds and crude oil plunged. Stocks and the dollar are basically unchanged...

Source: Bloomberg

Rate-cut odds have been jawboned wildly since the last FOMC, tumbling on Powell's hawkish bias (and plunging later on follow-on hawkish FedSpeak) only to surge back to a lock (100%) following Fed's Williams dovish comments right before the blackout began...

Source: Bloomberg

Today, we also get a fresh set of Dots, which many expect to shift more hawkishly. As the chart below shows, the market is already dramatically more dovish than the 'old' Dots...

Source: Bloomberg

The number of dissents will be on many people's watchlist with WSJ's Fed Whsiperer, Nick Timiraos, noting that "as many as five of the 12 voting members of the Fed’s policy committee, and 10 of all 19 members, have signaled in speeches or public interviews that they didn’t see a strong case to cut. Of those, only one formally dissented from the central bank’s decision to cut rates in October."

Hey @AskPolymarket what are the odds December FOMC meeting will have 4 dissenters or more.

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) November 21, 2025

The market is expecting 3 or more dissents...

So, we have five things to watch in today's Fed discussions: Rate-change (cut is a done deal, but then what), Dissents (record split), Dots (hawkish bias), Balance Sheet (QE begins?), Presser (hawkish?).

FOMC

As was 100% expected, The Fed cut rates...

• *FED CUTS BENCHMARK RATE TARGET RANGE TO 3.5%-3.75% IN 9-3 VOTE

But, also - as expected - there were dissents... the most since 1988

• Fed Governor Stephen Miran voted against the decision in favor of lowering rates by a half-point, while Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid and Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee dissented in favor of holding rates steady

FORWARD GUIDANCE (flying blind?):

• Fed to assess incoming data, evolving outlook and balance of risks in considering extent and timing of further adjustments

• Fed says it will monitor implications of incoming information for economic outlook

• Fed prepared to adjust policy stance if risks emerge impeding goal attainment

• Fed assessments to consider labor market conditions, inflation pressures, inflation expectations, financial and international developments

LABOR MARKET

• Fed says job gains slowed and unemployment edged up through September

INFLATION

• Fed says inflation moved up since earlier in year and remains somewhat elevated GDP GROWTH

• Fed says economic activity expanding at a moderate pace

BALANCE OF RISKS

• Fed says uncertainty about economic outlook remains elevated

• Fed judges downside risks to employment rose in recent months

But the “Dot plot” of rate projections did not signal a much more hawkish trajectory:

The median official expected to lower rates by a quarter-point in 2026 and another quarter-point in 2027, the same as they projected in September

In fact, arguably 2026 dots show a very slight dovish tilt from September (with the number of Fed voters wanting no cuts or a hike down from 8 to 7...

BALANCE SHEET (full details here)

• On December 10, 2025, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) directed the Open Market Trading Desk (the Desk) at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to increase System Open Market Account (SOMA) securities holdings to maintain an ample level of reserves through purchases in the secondary market of Treasury bills (or, if needed, of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less).

• These reserve management purchases (RMPs) will be sized to accommodate projected trend growth in the demand for Federal Reserve liabilities as well as seasonal fluctuations, such as those driven by tax payment dates.

• Monthly amounts of RMPs will be announced on or around the ninth business day of each month alongside a tentative schedule of purchase operations for the subsequent approximately thirty days.

• The Desk plans to release the first schedule on December 11, 2025, with a total amount of RMPs of approximately $40 billion in Treasury bills; purchases will start on December 12, 2025.

• The Desk anticipates that the pace of RMPs will remain elevated for a few months to offset expected large increases in non-reserve liabilities in April. [ZH: and in May Powell is out and Trump replaces him with a dovish surrogate].

• After that, the pace of total purchases will likely be significantly reduced in line with expected seasonal patterns in Federal Reserve liabilities. Purchase amounts will be adjusted as appropriate based on the outlook for reserve supply and market conditions.

• The Desk was also directed in October to reinvest all principal payments from the Federal Reserve's holdings of agency securities into Treasury bills via secondary market purchases. The monthly schedule of planned purchases will include RMPs as well as these purchases.

• The Desk plans to distribute the monthly secondary market purchases across two Treasury bill sectors. Purchase amounts in each sector will be determined by sector weights. These sector weights will be based on the 12-month average of the par amount of Treasury bills outstanding in each sector relative to the total amount outstanding across the two sectors as initially measured at the end of September 2025.

For the purists this is "Reserve Management Purchases", for the non-purists, QE is back with us.

SEP PROJECTIONS:

Fed Funds

• 2025: 3.625% (exp. 3.625%, prev. 3.625%)
• 2026: 3.375% (exp. 3.375%, prev. 3.375%)
• 2027: 3.125% (exp. 3.125%, prev. 3.125%)
• 2028: 3.125% (exp. 3.125%, prev. 3.125%)
• Longer run: 3.00% (exp. 3.125%, prev. 3.00%)

GDP Growth

• 2025:1.7% (exp. 1.8%, prev. 1.6%)
• 2026: 2.3% (exp. 1.8%, prev. 1.8%)
• 2027: 2.0% (exp. 1.9%, prev. 1.9%)
• 2028:1.9% (exp. 1.8%, prev. 1.8%)
• Longer run: 1.8% (exp. 1.8%, prev. 1.8%)

Unemployment rate

• 2025: 4.5% (exp. 4.5%, prev. 4.5%)
• 2026: 4.4% (exp. 4.5%, prev. 4.4%)
• 2027: 4.2% (exp. 4.4%, prev. 4.3%)
• 2028: 4.2% (exp. 4.2%, prev. 4.2%)
• Longer run: 4.2% (exp. 4.2%, prev. 4.2%)

PCE Inflation

• 2025: 2.9% (exp. 2.9%, prev. 3.0%)
• 2026: 2.4% (exp. 2.6%, prev. 2.6%)
• 2027: 2.1% (exp. 2.1%, prev. 2.1%)
• 2028: 2.0% (exp. 2.0%, prev. 2.0%)
• Longer run: 2.0% (exp. 2.0%, prev. 2.0%)

Core PCE Inflation

• 2025: 3.0% (exp. 3.0%, prev. 3.1%)
• 2026: 2.5% (exp. 2.6%, prev. 2.6%)
• 2027: 2.1% (exp. 2.2%, prev. 2.1%)
• 2028: 2.0% (exp. 2.1%, prev. 2.0%)

Finally, in a difference from the state of play into December 2024's hawkish cut, we note that equity positioning into the Fed looked skewed toward expectations for a benign or mildly hawkish cut that leaves the high-beta rotation intact, with the SPX still contained in a wider trading range.

Implied, realized and vol-of-vol are all back at more normal levels after November’s turbulence, while correlations and the tail-risk indexes sit in the middle or lower end of recent bands. The SPX term structure was in gentle backwardation into the FOMC, with forward implied vols pointing to only a modest post-meeting decline due to the importance of next week’s CPI and jobs report data.

SPX options are pricing a +/-0.7% move for FOMC day, largely in-line with expectations ahead of the past 8 FOMC events (+/-0.8%).

Will we get a surprise?

On average, the S&P 500 has moved +/-0.6% during the last 8 FOMC meetings with realized moves coming lower than expectations during all events except the December FOMC (hawkish cut) which saw an outsized move (-2.9%) relative to unusually low expectations (+/-0.7%).

Read the full red-line below...

Cracker Barrel shares are lower in premarket trading after posting softer-than-expected quarterly sales and cutting full-year revenue and profit guidance. Customer traffic dropped more than anticipated, driven in part by backlash after the casual dining chain effectively "Bud Lighted" itself with a disastrous woke rebranding.

The rebranding ... 

... which was eventually reversed and the marketing 'expert' resigned, appears to have a lasting impact on sales. 

First-quarter results swung to an adjusted loss of 74 cents per share versus a profit a year ago, slightly better than the Bloomberg Consensus estimate. Revenue dipped 6% and missed forecasts, with comparable sales for both restaurants and retail declining more than expected.

Wall Street analysts were spooked by the 7.3% decline in customer traffic for the quarter. 

Snapshot: First quarter results (courtsey of Bloomberg): 

• Adjusted loss per share 74c vs. EPS 45c y/y, estimate loss/shr 79c

• Revenue $797.2 million, -5.7% y/y, estimate $801.1 million

• Restaurant comp sales -4.7% vs. +2.9% y/y, estimate -4.02%

• Retail comparable sales -8.5% vs. -1.6% y/y, estimate -6.5%

Ongoing traffic deterioration sharply reduced annual sales and profit guidance (courtsey of Bloomberg):

• Sees revenue $3.2 billion to $3.3 billion, saw $3.35 billion to $3.45 billion, estimate $3.38 billion (Bloomberg Consensus)

• Sees capital expenditure $110 million to $125 million, saw $135 million to $150 million

• Sees adjusted Ebitda $70 million to $110 million, saw $150 million to $190 million

In premarket trading, Cracker Barrel shares are down about 5.5%. As of Tuesday's close, the stock has been cut in half since the August rebranding debut. 

Here's what Wall Street analysts are saying (courtsey of Bloomberg);

Piper Sandler (neutral, PT to $27 from $49), Brian Mullan

• "Unfortunately, the struggles that kicked off in August have continued at CBRL, with traffic in the quarter down 7.3% (better in the beginning of August, and then worse after that)," Mullan writes

• Traffic for the fiscal 2Q-to-date period is running down 11%, and management "materially" reduced its annual guidance

• Cracker Barrel is sticking with many of the turn-around efforts designed to help over the long-term, but the main takeaway from the 3Q report/conference is that "things remain pretty tough at the business in the here and now"

Citi (sell PT to $20 vs. $24), Jon Tower

• "The traffic slump spurred by the ill-fated logo change resonated through F1Q results, and, along with a softer restaurant backdrop, prompted a weaker start to F2Q and a FY26 guidance cut," Tower writes

• In the near-term, the company is "mixing in tactical sales drivers," like buy-one-get-one and holiday promos, that may "prove costly" to the P&L, and weaving in longer-term initiatives to "sustainably drive the top line and preserve profits."

• Believes the stock will remain under pressure until traffic/sales show "sustained improvement, as out-year numbers remain a question mark"

Truist (buy, PT to $45 from $50), Jake Bartlett

• "Sales trends have not begun to recover from the 8/19 re- branding fiasco, or any recovery has been offset by macro pressures," Bartlett writes 

• Says Cracker Barrel is "taking the right steps" to boost traffic, with its focus on improved service and food quality

• This has been reflected in improving guest satisfaction scores and will eventually, he believes, be reflected in a traffic recovery

• Business investments, including adding value to the menu and retaining labor hours, are headwinds to FY26 margins, but should drive operating leverage in FY27

Cracker Barrel is a case study for every other casual dining chain: go woke, get crushed.