CMR is the leading provider
of funding and management
support for small to
medium-sized businesses and
entrepreneurs
Established 1984 C MR
is the leading venture
capital, management
support and business
services provider for
small to medium-sized
businesses - linking
excellent management
skills with the
substantial financial
resources of a global bank
of private investors.
CMR has over 450 senior
executives, operating
in the UK, USA, Europe, Asia,
Australasia and
globally,
providing both funding and
specialist help for
entrepreneurial
businesses .
For Businesses
CMR provides excellent
resources:
CMR FundEX Business Exchange - gives all companies & entrepreneurs direct access to CMR's global investor base.
CMR Catalyst Group
Programme -
transform
profitability through
merging.
CMR Company Sales Division helps owners to exit
at the best price.
CMR Corporate Recovery
Division -
experts in rescue and
turnaround.
CMR Technology Licensing
Division -
commercialising
innovation.
CMR Executive
Professionals - management support
and consultancy.
CMR Executives-on-Demandâ„¢ Fully experienced
senior executives
available quickly and
cost effectively.
We always welcome
contact with new
business clients- please get in touch
- we will do our
best to match
your needs and exceed
your expectations.
For Investors
Preferential access to new opportunities for investment and/or acquisition
P re-vets
propositions and
provides a
personalised service
to our investors
Syndication service
enabling investors to
link together as desired
Executive and
management support for
investments as needed
CMR's services to
our investors are not
only fast & efficient
but also free
W e
always appreciate new
members- you are welcome
to join as an investor
or as a CMR Executive.
When you
join us as a Senior
Executive:
CMR's strength is in the
skills and experience of
our executive members -
all senior, director level
people with years of
successfully running and
managing companies.
Because the demand for
CMR's support and services
is ever-increasing,
especially as we enter
recessionary times, we
have a growing need for
more high calibre
executives to join us from
every industry and
discipline.
You will be using your
considerable experience to
help smaller businesses
and entrepreneurs to grow
profitably.
We offer full training
and mentoring support to
help maximise potential.
We are
always keen to find more
high calibre senior
executives in all areas-
skills and location.
Make contact with us today
and maximise your
opportunities.
HEAD
OFFICE
124 City Road
London EC1 2NX
Tel: +44 (0)207-636-1744
Fax:+44 (0)207-636-5639
Email: cmr@cmruk.com
Registered Office:
124 City Road ,
London EC1 2NX
Also Glasgow,
Dublin, Switzerland, Europe, USA/Canada
Privacy Statement: CMR only
retains personal details
supplied directly by executives
joining CMR themselves either as
Full Executive Members or
Interim Management Members or
Investors. Those details are
only used within CMR and not
disclosed to any third parties
without that person’s
agreement. We will keep that
data until requested by the
person to be removed – at that
point it will be deleted.
Personal data is never sold or
used for purposes outside of
CMR’s normal operations. Any
correspondence should be
directed to the Managing
Director, CMR,
Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London EC1V
2N
Senior Executives
CMR is a worldwide network of senior executives. Join us to expand your career and business horizons.
Business Entrepreneurs
CMR has a complete range of resources & services provided by experts to help all businesses to grow and prosper.
Investors & Venturers
CMR has a continuous stream of business and funding propositions, which are matched to investor preferences. Join us - it's FREE!
FundEX
FundEX is CMR's worldwide stock market for small to medium sized companies and entrepreneurs to raise new capital.
Interim & Permanent Management
Many of CMR's executives can be recruited on an interim, permanent or NED basis.
Login
Main CMR Intranet members only
Regional Intranets
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 21:20:00 +0000 We Want One Solution, But One Solution Can't Solve Our Polycrisis
We Want One Solution, But One Solution Can't Solve Our Polycrisis
We Want One Solution, But One Solution Can't Solve Our Polycrisis
Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via Substack ,
Whatever the problem, our minds seek one solution--preferably a simple one--to escape the trackless wilderness of complex, inter-connected problems. Problem-solving boils down to identifying the key problem and finding a fix that’s easy to understand and straightforward to apply.
Our minds rebel when confronted with polycrisis, a knotted mess of inter-connected problems , and so we apply solutions we already have in hand. As I explained in previous Musings, this leads us to modify our description of the problem so it aligns with the solution we already know.
This approach cannot actually solve the problem, but claiming we have a solution in hand is a highly attractive expediency for those tasked with solving problems, i.e. the leadership elites. It’s equally attractive to the rest of us, as we all want to banish uncertainty and anxiety with a quick painless fix.
Let’s start with the one solution many favor: fix the money, fix the world : if we reinstate sound money, that will fix the world. The proposed solution is easy to understand and straightforward to apply: gold (or bitcoin) is the only legal tender, so paper and digital money will be replaced by gold coins (or bitcoin equivalents).
The impetus for proposing this solution is self-evident: creating money out of thin air or by issuing credit-money that accrues interest is intrinsically self-liquidating, and so the status quo monetary system will run to failure (fiscal-financial-economic crisis) unless we change course.
I have often written that “if we don’t change the way money is created and distributed, we’ve changed nothing, “ because the current monetary system creates money at the top of the wealth-power pyramid and distributes it to the top.
The sum “trickling down” to the bottom 90% is losing purchasing power as prices rise, and so we’re seeking a monetary system that 1) reverses the “trickling” from “down” to “up” and 2) preserves the purchasing power of the bottom 90%’s labor, which is the “capital” they “own.”
The problem with the “gold is the only money” solution is it only fixes one problem: governments inflating away the value of their currency. In a corrupt society, it doesn’t eliminate corruption; it just means corruption will be transacted in gold or bitcoin.
It doesn’t reverse the “trickle” of money from its source from capital to labor/work, it favors capital enriching itself just as much as the current fiat system.
Like all such one-size-fits-all solutions, it also creates problems that are glossed over by its promoters, as everything is connected in ways that are not always visible at first blush.
Let’s break it down to its most basic dynamics.
In a “gold is the only money” economy, ten people each deposit one gold coin in a bank to earn interest on their money. The bank holds two coins in reserve to redeem depositors’ withdrawals, and loans the other eight coins to a new business seeking to expand.
Without the loan, the bank has no income to pay interest on the cash deposits. Without the loan, the enterprise doesn’t have the capital to expand. It’s win-win-win: depositors earn interest, the bank skims a profit for its owners and the enterprise now has the capital needed to expand.
So far so good, but...
Since economies expand and contract cyclically, a downturn occurs, and people spend less as a response to rising risk: revenues drop, workers are laid off and defaults / bankruptcies start rising.
Reducing-risk prudence leads four depositors to demand their coin back, and since the bank only has two coins in reserve, it calls the loan it made to the enterprise. The business has suffered in the downturn and can’t pay back the loan. The bank seizes the business and auctions its assets. Since valuations have fallen in the downturn, the assets only fetch two coins.
The bank now has four coins but the number of depositors demanding their coin back has risen to six. The bank fails, six depositors lose their money, and the enterprise is bankrupt.
This is precisely what happened in “sound money” 19th century America: hundreds of banks failed, depositors and borrowers were wiped out. The risk of panics triggering loans being called, assets being sold off at fire-sale prices, banks failing and depositors being wiped out are all intrinsic risks in this arrangement.
OK, so here’s the fix to panics: the government guarantees all depositors will get their gold coin back should a private bank fail. But the government doesn’t have enough gold to back up every deposit nationally; it too only has a reserve. Once the panic spreads nationally, the government’s reserves of gold coins are soon depleted.
This is the problem with “gold is the only money:” enterprises need capital to expand / launch, depositors seek a return on their capital, banks provide an institutional layer to manage these credit contracts.
After seeing other depositors lose their money, people no longer trust either banks or the government, and gold coins are withdrawn from circulation (stored at home) as a prudent measure. Credit--always limited to what banks had on deposit--becomes ever scarcer, crippling the real-world economy, as enterprises starved of capital have no way to expand.
OK, so here’s the fix: let’s let the government issue paper money “backed by gold.” So the Treasury issues $5,000 (the current global price of an ounce of gold) of currency for every ounce of gold it holds. But without a mechanism to keep currency and the market value of the gold aligned, then the Treasury can over time issue $50,000 of currency for each ounce held in the vault. The “backed by gold” claim is an artifice.
There’s another problem: gold, silver, oil, etc. are all commodities whose priced is “discovered” in global markets, so their value as measured in goods and services fluctuates beyond the control of any government.
As the global economy enters a boom cycle, gold rises to $10,000 an ounce, and the Treasury issues an additional $5,000 per ounce in currency. But when the boom turns to bust and the market value of gold returns to $5,000 per ounce, does the Treasury withdraw half the currency from circulation? No. The “backed by gold” currency has depreciated by half.
As I have often pointed out, “backed by gold” is illusory unless each unit of currency can be converted to gold coins on demand. Anything short of this is a duplicitous artifice.
Here’s another problem: the economy is expanding smartly, but the Treasury’s stash of gold isn’t expanding to match the increase of demand, as the government’s gold mines aren’t yielding much new gold. And since it’s costly to extract and refine the gold, the government spends most of the new gold paying to operate the mine.
The supply of gold coins is limited, and so money is scarce. People revert to barter or start using scrip or credit paper to transact business.
This is precisely what happened in the Medieval trade fairs: gold and silver were scarce, and as economic activity expanded, there weren’t enough coins to grease the expanding universe of transactions and productive enterprises.
The point here is using only precious metals as money comes with its own restrictions and risks . This is why economies augmented “sound money” in the first place. Using a commodity--which is subject to the same price discovery of supply and demand as any other commodity--is intrinsically problematic.
Basing a currency on a basket of commodities ends up facing the same problem: as the global price of the commodities fluctuates, so does the value of the currency, opening the door to distorting arbitrage and financial panics.
You see the other problem: the wealthy who have accumulated gold and silver are the lenders, and the commoners who only have their labor to sell / invest are the borrowers. There is risk on both sides of this equation, but over time those collecting interest will get richer and borrowers will be wiped out by a panic or downturn.
The wealth “trickles up,” and if the wealthy don’t lend their wealth to new enterprises, the economy stagnates. If banks don’t exist due to social trust being limited, then lending is restricted and the economy stagnates.
As a general rule, labor needs some working capital to turn work into a productive enterprise or other assets. So when entrepreneurial commoners sought to expand production in the “sound money” 1200s to 1400s, since they had little gold/silver or access to credit, they reverted to letters of credit and bills of exchange--forms of “paper money” that enabled transactions that would have otherwise never occurred.
As always, I recommend Braudel’s trilogy for those interested in gaining a more comprehensive understanding of money and the development of capitalism:
The Structures of Everyday Life: Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century Volume 1
The Wheels of Commerce: Civilization & Capitalism 15th-18th Century, Vol. 2
The Perspective of the World: Civilization & Capitalism, 15th - 18th Century Volume 3
I covered these topics in my books Money and Work Unchained and A Radically Beneficial World , in which I explain why attempting to make one form of money do all the work we need money to do is doomed by the intrinsic limits of each form of money.
Money that excels at being a “store of value” fails in an expansive capitalist economy as a “means of exchange” for all the reasons outlined above, and all the fixes to this create additional problems, as outlined above.
This is why the Chinese introduced paper money: it wasn’t to rip off commoners via inflation, it was the necessary means of greasing local commerce in an economy without credit and scarce precious-metal coinage, much of which was in the hands of the wealthy as it was an excellent “store of value.”
Every fix that’s easy to understand and straightforward to apply has similar limits that generate inherent problems which cannot be resolved with easy fixes, as those fixes generate another set of problems.
So to end corruption, we impose more laws, more oversight, and stiffer penalties . But as recent revelations have shown, changing the rules of governance, adding transparency laws and boosting penalties did not stop corruption from seeping into every nook and cranny of America’s ruling elites.
As Lao Tzu observed, “The more laws and restrictions there are, the poorer people become. The more rules and regulations, the more thieves and robbers. “ Corruption isn’t reduced by adding more laws, it’s reduced by changing the incentives and what society accepts or deems unacceptable.
Adding more laws to be skirted by elites doesn’t change anything; only the withdrawal of The Mandate of Heaven can disempower elites serving their own interests with absolute impunity.
Here are other examples of “this one solution will fix the world.”
If there’s “plenty of energy, that fixes the world. “ But if inequality has reached extremes, having lots of energy for the wealthiest few to enjoy isn’t going to solve inequality, or the social disorder it generates.
Or this solution: AI will fix the world. Since AI is owned and controlled by the ruling elites, it will do nothing but entrench the extremes of inequality that are destabilizing the social, political and economic realms.
Or this: technology will fix all our problems. Putting data centers owned by our corporate overlords into orbit fixes nothing.
The point I endeavored to make in my Revolution Trilogy --The Mythology of Progress , Ultra-Processed Life and Investing in Revolution --is that all these conventional solutions are self-serving artifice, expedient illusions that relieve our anxiety but at the cost of leaving problems unaddressed while layering on more problems.
There are no monetary or technological fixes to moral decay and the corruption of ruling elites. Stable social orders--from tribes to empires--are successful because their ruling elites have a reciprocal relationship with the commoners who sustain the entire system. Each class has its own duties and responsibilities to the other classes.
Records from the Roman Empire’s rule in Egypt show that much of the ruling elite’s time was spent responding to pleas for assistance from the subservient classes and resolving administrative / managerial issues.
When ruling elites renounce reciprocity to serve their own interests with absolute impunity, then the social order soon reaches the “let them eat brioche” phase where society fragments. If redress (i.e. rebalancing) is suppressed, then retribution comes to the fore: the Mandate of Heaven is lost and chaos ensues.
In either case, the only way to reconnect reciprocity / rebalance a fatally imbalanced system is a social revolution that is neither political or economic per se but which transforms both the political and economic realms by changing what’s acceptable and what’s no longer acceptable.
Polycrisis can’t be untangled with simple top-down, one-size-fits-all solutions or by modifying the definition of the problem so some painless fix can be touted as a solution. These illusory fixes only make the problems worse.
The more productive approach is to decentralize control and capital so more flexible, adaptive units can experiment with solutions: households, communities, cities, counties, locally based enterprises and regions.
The entire Waste Is Growth Landfill Economy mindset must be replaced with new incentives based on a new understanding that artifice is not a replacement for authenticity, and monetizing what is most valuable destroys it.
Adapt or die sounds harsh, but if real adaptation is required, then illusory fixes, self-serving elites and expedient redefinitions of the problem will only accelerate the unraveling and the reckoning.
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 16:20 Close Mon, 02 Mar 2026 20:55:00 +0000 Hormuz Paralyzed: Another Tanker Hit, Floating Parking Lot Of Ships Swells
Hormuz Paralyzed: Another Tanker Hit, Floating Parking Lot Of Ships Swells
Update (1555ET):
The latest Automatic Identification System (AIS) vessel-tracking data, via Bloomberg, shows that tanker tr
Read more.....
Hormuz Paralyzed: Another Tanker Hit, Floating Parking Lot Of Ships Swells
Update (1555ET):
The latest Automatic Identification System (AIS) vessel-tracking data, via Bloomberg, shows that tanker traffic in the Strait of Hormuz has been paralyzed , with only a few tankers still transiting the critical maritime energy chokepoint.
U.S. Central Command said in a statement on X that IRGC naval power has been severely degraded after U.S. forces and their allies eliminated at least eleven warships.
That may explain why Brent crude futures have not been able to sustain $80 per barrel, as traders appear to assess that the IRGC's loss of warships would make any attempt to mount a blockade short-lived, especially given U.S. naval power in the region.
Late U.S. cash session, UBS analyst Jonathan Garber told clients that "Iran's Revolutionary Guards commander said the Strait of Hormuz is closed and they will set any ship on fire that tries to pass through, Reuters reports, citing Iranian media. WTI crude oil is now up more than 7% following the headlines."
BBG Headlines:
However, the loss of IRGC naval power should not lead investors to discount the regime's asymmetric capabilities, such as using missiles and drones to target tankers in the narrow waterway.
That risk appeared to materialize late in the U.S. cash session, when reports emerged that two IRGC drones struck the oil tanker Athen Nova .
* * *
FGE NexantECA Chairman Emeritus Fereidun Fesharaki told Bloomberg TV on Monday morning that any attempt by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to choke off the critical Strait of Hormuz using warships, drones, and missiles would likely be short-lived, as the regime's naval capability is too weak to sustain a blockade against U.S., British, and French naval forces.
"It's just a fear factor ," Fesharaki said earlier on Bloomberg TV, following his prediction one week earlier on Bloomberg TV: "I don't think the U.S. has a choice but to go to war. It is very hard for me to see a scenario in which they would simply avoid this, turn the ships around, and go home." Fesharaki has tracked the market for decades.
Fesharaki said this morning, "The Revolutionary Guard navy is a minor force compared with what the American navy, the British, and the French can bring in."
Fesharaki's comments about the duration of the war mirrored President Trump's remarks to The Daily Mail on Sunday, in which he said Operation Epic Fury would last about four weeks . He also described the IRGC as a "paper tiger."
On Sunday, Trump announced that nine Iranian naval ships had been sunk in the operation.
"I have just been informed that we have destroyed and sunk nine Iranian naval ships, some of them relatively large and important," Trump wrote in a post on X, adding that Iran's naval headquarters has been "largely destroyed" in a different attack.
"We are going after the rest — they will soon be floating at the bottom of the sea, also!" Trump wrote.
Rapidan Energy Group analyst Fernando Ferreira provided more insight on the Strait:
Iran understands that threatening traffic through Hormuz is its most credible asymmetric lever. Even limited interference can raise oil prices and impose immediate economic costs on the U.S. and its partners, increasing pressure on Washington to de-escalate.
We expect at least moderate disruptions to Gulf oil flows in the coming days, with the risk tilted toward something more severe if tensions escalate further.
As of Monday morning, Automatic Identification System (AIS) vessel-tracking data via Bloomberg shows that tanker activity in the critical maritime energy chokepoint has mostly frozen, with limited transits.
Related:
Goldman analyst Adam Crook told clients over the weekend that any prolonged disruption of the Strait could push Brent crude prices toward $100/bbl. Currently, Brent crude futures trade around $79 as of 0900 ET.
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 15:55 Close Mon, 02 Mar 2026 20:40:00 +0000 US Vigilant Against Possible Domestic Attacks Amid Iran War: Hegseth
US Vigilant Against Possible Domestic Attacks Amid Iran War: Hegseth
US Vigilant Against Possible Domestic Attacks Amid Iran War: Hegseth
Authored by Savannah Hulsey Pointer via The Epoch Times,
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth says the Trump administration is monitoring for any sleeper cell activity in the United States.
Hegseth’s March 2 comments came after questions about a possible attack on the homeland in response to the strikes on Iran.
“We’re ready for that,” the secretary told reporters at the Pentagon.
“We’ve seen these types of folks before, and the American people can rest assured that we’re vigilant.”
Hegseth was also questioned about the March 1 shooting that took place in Austin, Texas, that resulted in multiple casualties.
According to reports from Austin Police, an armed man opened fire outside a bar, killing two and wounding 14 others.
FBI official Alex Doran told reporters that the shooter’s motivation had not been established. Evidence found on the individual and in his vehicle, however, suggests a “potential nexus to terrorism,” but “it’s still too early to make a determination,” he said.
When questioned about the attack over the weekend, Hegseth said that the event “does not change [Operation Epic Fury] at all.”
The operation in Iran is not slowing down, with Pentagon officials saying that additional U.S. forces will continue to flow into the Middle East.
The strikes on Iran have been termed “major combat operations,” and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine says hundreds of land and sea missions have been launched in Operation Epic Fury.
Caine offered a briefing alongside Hegseth, saying the U.S. military’s mission is to “protect and defend ourselves, and together with our regional partners, prevent Iran from the ability to project power outside of its borders.”
Hegseth and Caine emphasized the preparation that went into the recent military strike, saying the operation in Iran was the result of months, even years, of planning.
However, according to the general, the mission is not yet complete.
“We expect to take additional losses, and as always, we will work to minimize U.S. losses,” Caine added.
“The effort continues to scale,” Caine said, going on to describe the equipment used and extended efforts to take out Iranian weapons systems.
“I am proud today, as I am every day, to stand as a member of America’s Joint Force. There is no mission too complex, no distance too great, and no adversary too determined for the men and women who wear our nation’s uniform.”
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 15:40 Close Mon, 02 Mar 2026 20:00:00 +0000 NYC Pakistan-Owned Hotel Took $146M For Illegals But Owes $13M In Taxes
NYC Pakistan-Owned Hotel Took $146M For Illegals But Owes $13M In Taxes
NYC Pakistan-Owned Hotel Took $146M For Illegals But Owes $13M In Taxes
Authored by Luis Cornelio via HeadlineUSA ,
The Pakistani government owes New York City taxpayers millions in unpaid taxes despite making nearly $150 million through the Roosevelt Hotel by housing illegal aliens .
The Roosevelt Hotel, owned by Pakistani International Airlines, a quasi-state entity, has $13.6 million in overdue property taxes and nearly $1 million in unpaid water bills , according to the New York Post
The hotel became a hub for illegal aliens after then-New York City Mayor Eric Adams entered contracts allowing hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens to live on the premises.
According to the Post, the Roosevelt Hotel processed more than 173,000 of the 232,000 illegal aliens in the city.
Taxpayers paid a total of $146.6 million, or $202 per room each night, for roughly 2,600 illegal aliens each night from May 2023 through June 2025.
Among those staying at the formerly luxury hotel was Jose Ibarra, a Venezuelan gang member serving a life sentence without parole for the murder of nursing student Laken Riley in Georgia.
The unpaid property taxes stem from a payment agreement with the city’s Department of Finance in September 2023, which required the hotel to pay $573,361 on Jan. 2. But as noted by the Post, that half-a-million-dollar bill again went unpaid, as did the $3.9 million half-year installment.
But New Yorkers expecting those bills to be paid could be out of luck.
The hotel recently entered a deal with the federal government to redevelop the landmark property, which could allow the Pakistani government to avoid future taxes.
According to the Post, the arrangement might trigger a federal tax exemption, as the U.S. Department of State often asks city governments to grant exemptions when foreign governments purchase U.S. properties.
A spokesperson for the Department of Finance said the agency has not “received” such a request but warned that prior charges “must still be paid.”
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 15:00 Close Mon, 02 Mar 2026 19:55:00 +0000 Trump Vows 'Big Wave' Yet To Come As Pentagon Boasts US Took Out Nearly All Iran's Navy
Trump Vows 'Big Wave' Yet To Come As Pentagon Boasts US Took Out Nearly All Iran's Navy
Summary: President Trump opened Monday's Medal of Honor ceremony in the White House East Wing with a carefully prepared, somewh
Read more.....
Trump Vows 'Big Wave' Yet To Come As Pentagon Boasts US Took Out Nearly All Iran's Navy
Summary: President Trump opened Monday's Medal of Honor ceremony in the White House East Wing with a carefully prepared, somewhat brief statement on Operation Epic Fury. Speaking deliberatively - but not quite with the level of his typically confident and energetic tone and demeanor - he spoke initially and broadly on the rationale for ordering the attack on Iran, which is now in day three and has taken at least four American troop lives at this point. Trump vowed to "crush" the "Iranian threat posed to the US," claiming that "we will easily prevail" . He declared that already US forces have knocked out ten ships, and that the plan is to also ensure the Iranians "can't fund armies beyond borders". But high on the minds of Congressional leaders and the American public is: what's next? Trump gave a timeline of a "projected four to five weeks" for war with Iran, "but we can go longer" and this will involve "whatever it takes." He vowed to continue the mission with "unyielding resolve" - even amid reports that US Gulf allies UAE and Qatar are now lobbying allies to persuade Trump to end the Iran war soon (as the Gulf continues to feel the impact of Iran's retaliatory strikes). The President just committed the nation to another potentially open-ended war in the Middle East .
CENTCOM: Six US service members have been killed in action.
Attacks reported on US bases and locations in Kuwait and Jordan.
Trump claims 'big wave' coming against Iran as Pentagon says more troops deployed to region
UAE Defense Ministry says air defenses intercepted 9 ballistic missiles and 148 drones
IDF says it struck over 70 Hezbollah weapons storage facilities in Lebanon
In the middle of remarks on Iran, Trump touts White House ballroom construction
US military says it has struck over 1,250 targets in Iran since start of ops
CENTCOM: Two days ago, the Iranian regime had 11 ships in the Gulf of Oman, today they have ZERO.
IDF Intelligence Chief: “We eliminated in 40 seconds more than 40 of the most important people in Iran, but we haven’t finished. There is no place where we won’t find our enemies.”
The IDF struck numerous assets belonging to the financial institution that helps Hezbollah sustain itself.
NATO leadership says alliance won't join US-Israeli Iran ops Trump says he does not rule out sending ground troops to Iran: “I don’t have the yips with respect to boots on the ground — like every president says, ‘There will be no boots on the ground.’ I don’t say it,” Trump said after launching strikes Saturday to decapitate Iran’s military and political leadership. “I say ‘probably don’t need them,’ [or] ‘if they were necessary.'”
QatarEnergy’s LNG production halt could shake up global gas markets.
Iran FM: Regional countries should pressure US to halt Iran strikes, says not at war with Gulf/regional countries
Advisor to IRGC says Strait of Hormuz has been closed and they will target any ship. Whether true or not: How many ships will be willing to go through with Iranian kamikaze drones taking pot shots? * * *
Update(1015ET) : three US F-15s downed over Kuwait. Iran is claiming to have shot down at least one US jet, while the US and Kuwait counter-claim that it was actually Kuwaiti 'friendly fire'. Some six total US airmen parachuted down safely into Kuwaiti territory.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has meanwhile stated that at this point approximately 600 Iranian infrastructure sites have been dismantled in Iran using 2,500 munitions. These sites included "over 20 targets belonging to Iranian military leaders," the IDF said. But as the conflict expands into Lebanon, and as many Gulf countries continue witnessing inbound Iranian missiles and drones, NATO command has distanced itself from the conflict, with Secretary General Mark Rutte stating Monday that the alliance "will not participate" in the joint US-Israeli mission. The Joint Chiefs say that more American service members are being added to the operation .
THE BIG WAR GAMBLE... or, Rabobank's take paraphrased down to a single key sentence :
The US strike on Iran is Trump’s high-risk gamble to choke China's energy lifeline, flip Tehran to allied control, open the India-Middle East-Europe corridor, weaken Russia, and lock in 21st-century US hegemony—delivering quick regime change and falling oil prices that cement Trumpism as a historic win, OR sparking Middle East chaos and global blowback that hands Beijing the advantage in a new age of empires.
In the meantime, War Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared on the defensive in a Pentagon briefing early Monday. He confirmed there are as yet no US boots on the ground, while also seeking to assure the American public this is not an "endless war". And yet, reporters were still left frustrated by lack of a clear timeline , or laying out of specific objectives which must be accomplished before Operation Epic Fury is declared over. There was a moment where Hegseth erupted at a reporter's question, revealing that tensions are high at the Pentagon:
But worrisomely for the prospect of escalation, NBC observes that Hegseth did not rule out boots on the ground :
Asked whether U.S. boots are on the ground, Hegseth said no, but said he would not lay out what the U.S. could do as the operation continues .
Hegseth said that Trump ensures that the country's enemies know that the U.S. will go as far as it needs to in order to advance the U.S.' interests.
Time will tell if this firm pledge becomes a reality or not:
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Monday that military operations against Iran would not lead to an "endless war" and that the aim was to destroy Tehran's missiles, Navy and other security infrastructure.
"We're hitting them surgically, overwhelmingly and unapologetically," Hegseth said during a press conference at the Pentagon.
Screenshot: Massive bombing of Tehran on Day 3 continues. Trump previously told The Daily Mail he expects the operation could take up to four weeks . One month of intense war will seem like a lifetime, given how fast events at the 'blowback' have been coming over the last some 48 to 72 hours. And he's just told CNN: "We are about to hit them hard, the operation is progressing very well, the big wave hasn't happened yet and it will come soon ."
Blowback effects mounting:
Hegseth and Gen. Caine offered condolences to families of the fallen : "I want to express my deep condolences and the condolences of the joint force to the Department of War personnel killed and wounded in action," Caine said, calling the fallen soldiers heroes who "represent the best of our nation has to offer. They're true examples of what selfless service means.".
* * *
It is only day three of 'Operation Epic Fury' and Americans are waking up to shocking images of US fighter jets going down over Kuwait , and the incredibly rare scene of pilots parachuting down with a look of disbelief and confusion...
US CENTCOM has confirmed, following a Kuwaiti government statement, "At 11:03 p.m. ET, March 1, three U.S. F-15E Strike Eagles flying in support of Operation Epic Fury went down over Kuwait due to an apparent friendly fire incident."
That's three US warplanes in apparently one incident. How does that happen? Of course, given the already thick fog of war and propaganda narratives fast going back and forth, it's entirely possible they could have been shot down by Iranian defenses or jets from just across the border. Iran is saying it has shot down at least one US F-15 fighter jet :
IRAN SAYS IT SHOT DOWN US F-15 FIGHTER JET: TASNIM
Here's the fuller CENTCOM narrative:
CENTCOM: “During active combat—that included attacks from Iranian aircraft, ballistic missiles, and drones — the U.S. Air Force fighter jets were mistakenly shot down by Kuwaiti air defenses . All six aircrew ejected safely, have been safely recovered, and are in stable condition. Kuwait has acknowledged this incident, and we are grateful for the efforts of the Kuwaiti defense forces and their support in this ongoing operation.”
American pilot found by Kuwait police and locals, via X. Given there's now an official Pentagon casualty/death count, and given the fact that the Gulf allies and especially Israel are getting hit hard by Iran's significant ballistic missile arsenal, President Trump himself may now be (only too late) realize he just bit off more than he can chew in ordering this ultra-risky regime change operation .
There's as yet no clear endgame . Trump has talked about reaching objectives - without defining them, in something eerily (and predictably!) familiar with the 2003 Iraq war under Bush and the Neocons. Recall too that Trump just told The Atlantic magazine on Sunday morning that Tehran wanted to speak to him while feeling the pressure of the bombs falling, and that he was willing to do so . "They want to talk, and I have agreed to talk, so I will be talking to them," he said from his residence in Florida.
But soon after it became clear that's not happening - the Iranian genie is out of the bottle ...or we could say Pandora's Box Persian-style , which could make even Iraq look like a cakewalk. Adding insult to injury is that this is everything Trump and his team campaigned against .
Trump has already pivoted to saying the conflict looks to take up to four weeks (will it take years as Iraq did? nobody knows). Below is the man that was tapped by the slain Ayatollah Khamenei to run the day to day in his stead:
And to that, the Pentagon responds... also with Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine on Monday morning declaring that the US has local air superiority in Iran .
Israel is taking significant casualties , especially after Sunday's direct large Iranian warhead impact on a town near Jerusalem which left at least 9 dead and dozens wounded. Hezbollah has entered the war and in response Israel is once again pounding southern Lebanon and Beirut. Major international airports in the Gulf, particularly in the UAE, have bit hit by missiles and drones - also as US bases across the Gulf continue to be targeted. Even British-US bases on Cyprus have come under drone attack .
Gulf nations are seeing casualties, and even other European bases in the region have come under fire . American bases in northern Iraq have also been heavily targeted in Iran's retaliation waves. These have been sustained, particularly on Israel . One question which we've been covering remains: which side will have the missile and firepower arsenal to outlast the other? ...as the costs will soon enter the billions. Most importantly, as of Monday morning CENTCOM has newly confirmed four American troops killed in the operation.
Needless to say, if Trump's thinking really approached this as if it was 'one and done' Venezuela, and that after some quick salvo a country of 90 million with a well-armed and experienced military would immediately shout 'uncle!' - he's probably already realizing the situation is spiraling out of control far beyond his expectation. But he was clearly and loudly warned . Yet, it's also true that Iranian top leadership is fast being decimated - with over 40 top officers reportedly killed . But Iran is able to fill these ranks fast, most likely.
Shock & Awe on Tehran In Washington right now, the biggest story centers on headlines of "paranoia" and deep "anxiety" at the Pentagon in in national security council ranks :
Pentagon officials are worried about Donald Trump’s Iran strikes spiraling out of control if they stick to his timeline.
While the president boasts that the strikes could continue for several more weeks, military leaders are sounding the alarm behind the scenes about U.S. air defense stockpiles running out if the fighting goes on that long. “The mood here is intense and paranoid,” one insider told The Washington Post.
It seems the Pentagon is already throwing the White House and Trump under the bus , or is at least doing so through 'anonymous' quotes given to WaPo, NYT, CNN and others :
Pentagon briefers acknowledged to congressional staff in a briefing Sunday that Iran was not planning to strike US forces or bases in the Middle East unless Israel attacked Iran first, undercutting the administration’s argument Saturday that Tehran was planning to potentially strike the US preemptively and posed an imminent threat, according to multiple people who attended the briefing.
Senior administration officials told reporters Saturday that the US chose to attack Iran because it had received indications the regime was planning to launch missile attacks against US bases in the region preemptively and create a mass casualty situation. CNN reported Saturday that sources said there was no intelligence to support the administration’s claim .
And after all, Iran's economy was already brought to its knees through years of crippling sanctions, and the Iranians appeared to come hat in hand to the negotiating table in Geneva.
To recount the warning late last month issued by no less than the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine - the issues already facing American forces were clearly outlined and predicted. According to out prior paraphrase and outline of what's being freshly reported by WSJ :
1) Caine warned that the war plans under consideration carry a high risk of significant American and allied casualties .
2) He cautioned that a multi-day campaign would exhaust air-defense munitions and other limited-supply items, which are critical for protecting regional partners like Israel if Iran retaliates.
3) An intensive operation against Iran could deplete stockpiles to a level that would complicate U.S. readiness for a potential future conflict with China .
4) He described the potential campaign as one that could "stretch the military thin" and leave forces "overtaxed".
5) Caine's gave "high likelihood of success" reassurances before the January 2026 mission to apprehend Nicolas Maduro, he has been unable to provide similar guarantees regarding a large-scale strike on Iran .
Below is a review of the mounting casualties across the region from Operation Epic Fury. The US has so far issued an official count of four US troops killed and five others seriously wounded . That could already be significantly higher, unfortunately - along with the below numbers which are expected to climb:
Iran: At least 555 people have died since joint US-Israeli strikes began, according to the Red Crescent Society. Iranian state media reported that 168 students were killed in an airstrike on a girls’ elementary school, with three more students killed in separate attacks in Tehran and northern Iran. China’s foreign ministry confirmed that one Chinese national was also killed.
Lebanon: Israeli airstrikes on southern Lebanon and Beirut have killed at least 31 people, the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health said.
Israel: At least 10 people have been killed and more than 200 wounded since Israel launched operations against Iran, according to Magen David Adom. Nine of the dead were in Beit Shemesh, where a missile struck a bomb shelter.
Iraq: A US-Israeli strike hit a headquarters of Iraq’s Iran-aligned Popular Mobilization Forces, killing four members, the group’s Media Directorate said.
United Arab Emirates: Iran’s retaliatory strikes killed three people in the UAE, the defense ministry said. The victims—nationals of Pakistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh—were killed after Iranian drones penetrated the country’s air defenses.
Kuwait: Three US service members were killed in a suspected drone attack early Sunday, according to sources familiar with the incident. Separately, Kuwait’s health ministry reported one fatality from Iranian strikes.
Bahrain: One person died after debris from an intercepted missile ignited a fire aboard a “foreign vessel” in Salman Industrial City, according to Bahraini state media.
War spreads to Israel-Hezbollah theatre in Lebanon:
To again cite, Glenn Greenwald, who summarized best how we got where we are: "For decades, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and American neoconservatives have dreamed of only one foreign policy goal : having the United States fight a regime-change war against Iran. With the Oval Office occupied by Donald Trump — who campaigned for a full decade on a vow to end regime-change wars and vanquish neoconservatism — their goal has finally been realized ."
On the question of grand strategy and the White House's likely long term global geopolitical chessboard vision, we have also featured that The Iran Question Is All About China .
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 14:55 Close Mon, 02 Mar 2026 19:53:00 +0000 Satellite Images Reveal Aftermath Of Drone Attack On Saudi Arabia's Biggest Refinery
Satellite Images Reveal Aftermath Of Drone Attack On Saudi Arabia's Biggest Refinery
Satellite Images Reveal Aftermath Of Drone Attack On Saudi Arabia's Biggest Refinery
Update (1453ET):
New GEOINT from spatial intelligence firm Vantor shows high-resolution satellite imagery of the aftermath of a reported Iranian drone strike early Monday on Saudi Aramco's Ras Tanura complex. This attack has taken Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery offline.
Vantor's satellite imagery shows visible damage across multiple refinery structures, though the full extent of the disruption and physical destruction remains unclear.
Meanwhile, Tehran's deputy foreign minister, Majid Takht-Revanchi, denied claims that Iran attacked the Ras Tanura complex following earlier reports.
* * *
A drone strike forced Saudi Aramco to suspend operations at its Ras Tanura complex while damage assessments are underway on Monday, reviving a 2024 warning we issued that any successful Iranian or Iran-backed militia strike on critical Saudi refining infrastructure could trigger a global oil shock and, in a more severe scenario, set the stage for a broader financial crisis (reminder credit markets are already cracking ).
Sources familiar with the drone attack on the Ras Tanura complex told Bloomberg News that Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery "came under attack by a drone" and "halted operations as a precaution while it assesses damage."
Footage of the aftermath of the drone strike on the Ras Tanura complex was published on X.
Saudi Arabia released a statement in the state-run Saudi Press Agency stating that the damage was "limited" and that a fire was caused by the interception of two drones. The government said the drone attack and resulting missile interceptors did not cause civilian injuries.
The attack on Ras Tanura will ring alarm bells across the energy space because the complex is not just a refinery; it's also part of Saudi Arabia's most important oil hubs. It's a central Persian Gulf terminal with a port able to handle the largest tankers, and Reuters notes that the refinery sits within a Gulf coast energy complex that also serves as a critical Saudi crude export hub.
For the crude products market, the refinery is massive. Reuters notes Ras Tanura's refining capacity at about 550,000 barrels per day, so any outage can tighten the supply of gasoline, diesel, and other refined products, especially across Gulf, Asian, and European markets.
For the crude market, the bigger issue is the surrounding export infrastructure. Saudi Arabia is a leader in global flows, and EIA says Saudi crude and petroleum product exports made up 34% of OPEC crude exports and 26% of OPEC petroleum product exports in 2023. That means any downtime at these critical Saudi loading/refining hubs can quickly spark turmoil in global crude markets.
"The attack on Saudi Arabia's Ras Tanura refinery marks a significant escalation, with Gulf energy infrastructure now squarely in Iran's sights ," Torbjorn Soltvedt, principal Middle East analyst at risk intelligence company Verisk Maplecroft, said, who was quoted by Bloomberg.
Soltvedt noted, "The attack is also likely to move Saudi Arabia and neighbouring Gulf states closer to joining US and Israeli military operations against Iran ."
Meanwhile...
In March 2024, David Asher, a senior fellow at Hudson Institute and former investigator into Covid origins at the State Department, penned a report titled "Navigating the New World Disorder: Economic Faultlines, Fissures, Fractures, and Failures ."
In the note, Asher pointed to a world that is in crisis, similar to the 1920s/30s.
More importantly, he warned that in the event Iran or Iran-backed militias begin targeting Saudi Arabia's crude processing facilities, this could unleash a "Global oil shock could trigger a crisis ala 2007-2008."
Important to note, and simultaneously, private credit markets are cracking, as we penned last night:
In the overnight, Brent crude futures surged 13% to above $82 a barrel. By 0730 ET, crude futures were trading around the $79 handle. Now, ICE gasoil futures surged 20% on news of the drone strike at Ras Tanura.
By late 2024, Asher penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal titled "A Strategy for Striking Back at Iran "...
Asher's roadmap (read here ) of how the US would dismantle the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps played out this past weekend in Operation Epic Fury .
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 14:53 Close Mon, 02 Mar 2026 19:25:00 +0000 Potential Strikes On Iran's Reactor and Nuclear Complexes
Potential Strikes On Iran's Reactor and Nuclear Complexes
Update: Iran Alleges Strikes on Natanz Enrichment Facility
Amid ongoing military operations that have targeted Iran’s Arak heavy-water react
Read more.....
Potential Strikes On Iran's Reactor and Nuclear Complexes
Update: Iran Alleges Strikes on Natanz Enrichment Facility
Amid ongoing military operations that have targeted Iran’s Arak heavy-water reactor site, Tehran claims the United States and Israel also struck its key Natanz uranium enrichment complex on Sunday, March 1.
According to Iran’s state news agency IRNA, Atomic Energy Organization chief Mohammad Eslami informed IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi in a letter that “the criminal regimes of the United States and Israel… again targeted the Natanz nuclear site on Sunday afternoon .”
The Institute for Science and International Security claims they have verified the strikes.
Iran’s IAEA ambassador Reza Najafi repeated the accusation to reporters during Monday’s emergency Board of Governors meeting in Vienna, calling the facilities “peaceful” and “safeguarded.”
However, Grossi told the same session that the agency has “no indication that any of the nuclear installations have been damaged or hit.” He added that IAEA monitoring, including satellite imagery, has revealed nothing comparable to the major damage at Natanz during the June 2025 strikes, though contact with Iranian authorities remains limited.
The Iranian claims have not been independently verified. Israel and the United States have not commented on any specific strike at Natanz. The head of Iran’s atomic energy organization reiterated the claim from earlier this morning that the US has bombed the Natanz nuclear facility again.
* * *
Foreign media sources are circulating claims US/Israeli forces struck Iran’s Arak heavy-water reactor complex. If confirmed, this would mark the second major hit on the facility in less than a year, underscoring Jerusalem and Washington’s determination to eliminate every pathway to an Iranian nuclear weapon.
The Arak site, located about 250 km southwest of Tehran in Markazi Province, houses the unfinished IR-40/Khondab 40-megawatt thermal heavy-water research reactor and an adjacent Heavy Water Production Plant (HWPP). Originally designed in the early 2000s to potentially produce weapons-grade plutonium , the reactor was partially redesigned under the 2015 JCPOA to limit plutonium output for civilian isotope production. The reactor core was filled with cement and remained non-operational and defueled .
During last year’s escalation , Israel conducted a precision strike on the site. Satellite imagery showed the reactor’s containment dome breached and the core likely destroyed to prevent any future plutonium pathway. The adjacent HWPP suffered damage to distillation towers, though the full extent of production capability loss remains unclear. The IAEA confirmed no radiological release occurred , as the site contained no nuclear fuel or fissile material.
The IAEA has repeatedly stated that strikes here pose negligible off-site contamination risks, unlike potential meltdowns at operational power reactors (Bushehr) or chemical hazards at enrichment halls. Monitoring stations in neighboring countries have reported no radiation spikes following recent operations.
Strategically, neutralizing Arak closes Tehran’s plutonium option, complementing earlier damage to Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan enrichment facilities. It signals that no element of Iran’s nuclear program is off-limits, potentially setting back breakout timelines by years and weakening the regime’s deterrence posture
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 14:25 Close Mon, 02 Mar 2026 19:20:00 +0000 Only The 38th Largest Oil Spike Since 1990
Only The 38th Largest Oil Spike Since 1990
Today’s CoTD from DB's Jim Reid shows the daily price of oil back to 1990. When he published the report, oil (+8.4%) was tracking to be the 38th biggest daily gain over this 36-year period.
Read more.....
Only The 38th Largest Oil Spike Since 1990
Today’s CoTD from DB's Jim Reid shows the daily price of oil back to 1990. When he published the report, oil (+8.4%) was tracking to be the 38th biggest daily gain over this 36-year period. The graph annotates the clusters where we have seen larger moves.
So even though it’s a big move, to get into the top 20, 10 and 5 it would need to be up +9.6%, +13.6% and +13.9% respectively .
There were huge moves around the GFC and Covid-19 turmoil, whilst the Gulf War in 1990-91 also saw several double-digit gains.
Incidentally, since Jim published his chart of the day, oil has sold off more , and at last check it was up just 5.7% on the day, erasing its kneejerk spike by more than half.
Going forward, Reid says that much will depend on the Strait of Hormuz.
It seems it’s not officially closed but passage through it would be hazardous at the moment with self-imposed restrictions from virtually all that normally travel through it.
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 14:20 Close Mon, 02 Mar 2026 19:00:00 +0000 AI 'Vibe Coding' Could Put Ethereum Roadmap Ahead Of Schedule: Vitalik Buterin
AI 'Vibe Coding' Could Put Ethereum Roadmap Ahead Of Schedule: Vitalik Buterin
AI 'Vibe Coding' Could Put Ethereum Roadmap Ahead Of Schedule: Vitalik Buterin
Authored by Martin Young via CoinTelegraph.com,
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin says an experiment that used artificial intelligence to prototype the blockchain’s roadmap out to 2030 in just a few weeks could have lessons for developers.
“This is quite an impressive experiment. Vibe-coding the entire 2030 roadmap within weeks,” posted to X on Saturday after a developer made a bet with Buterin in February that one person could use AI to code a reference implementation of the blockchain’s roadmap.
Buterin added that AI is “massively accelerating coding” and that people “should be open to the possibility that the Ethereum roadmap will finish much faster than people expect, at a much higher standard of security than people expect.”
Vibe coding is where AI creates the code for an application, allowing developers to quickly create software. The practice has become more popular as AI models have improved at coding; however, some warn that AI-generated code can be insecure.
ETH2030 architecture stack. Source: YQ
Buterin says AI code would have “critical bugs”
Buterin said that there were “massive caveats” to using AI, as the speed at which the code was written means it “almost certainly has lots of critical bugs, and probably in some cases ‘stub’ versions of a thing where the AI did not even try making the full version.”
“But six months ago, even this was far outside the realm of possibility, and what matters is where the trend is going,”
Buterin cautioned that, instead of focusing on speed, more emphasis should be placed on security.
“The right way to use it is to take half the gains from AI in speed, and half the gains in security: generate more test-cases, formally verify everything, make more multi-implementations of things.”
He said that he was personally excited about the possibility that bug-free code, “long considered an idealistic delusion,” will finally become first possible and “then a basic expectation.”
Buterin has been active commenting on the recently released roadmap from the Ethereum Foundation, “Strawmap,” which outlines all upgrades planned for the next four years.
He has previously proposed plans to make Ethereum quantum-resistant and on Sunday said that account abstraction, or smart accounts, would “happen within a year.”
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 14:00 Close Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:20:00 +0000 Construction Spending On Data Centers, Factories, Powerplants, And Office Buildings: Boom, Bust, And In Between
Construction Spending On Data Centers, Factories, Powerplants, And Office Buildings: Boom, Bust, And In Between
Construction Spending On Data Centers, Factories, Powerplants, And Office Buildings: Boom, Bust, And In Between
Authored by Wolf Richter via Wolf Street ,
Construction spending on data centers in 2025 exploded by 32% from the prior year, by over 100% in two years, and by 344% from 2020, to $41 billion, according to the Census Bureau on Friday. Spending on construction costs of data centers used to be buried in office construction and was minimal compared to office construction. But more recently, the Census Bureau split out data-center construction spending going back to 2014.
Construction costs of data centers are only a relatively small portion of the immense amounts spent on AI infrastructure, most of which goes into electronic and electrical equipment, from AI servers to power generation equipment. Construction spending on data centers does not include the costs of the servers and racks but does include the cooling systems in the building and other built-in electrical equipment.
It takes years from the decision to build a data center to the data center being actually operational. And the massive amounts of capital expenditures announced by AI-related Corporate America in 2025 and the plans for 2026 haven’t yet shown up in the construction costs.
The amounts of capital expenditures being thrown around for 2026 are fantastical. Five companies alone – Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, and Oracle – have announced plans for $700 billion in capital expenditures for 2026, largely for AI-related projects. And how will they get this cash next year ?
So this construction boom is not slowing down, unless tripped up by further the shortages of all kinds, such as power from the grid, power generators when there is no grid power, electrical equipment, electricians, specialized labor, etc.
Inflation for construction costs for nonresidential buildings jumped by 1.1% in January from December, according to the Producer Price Index (PPI) for nonresidential construction, released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday (it was hot all around ). Year-over-year, the nonresidential construction PPI was up by 2.8%, almost all of which occurred over the past four months.
From January 2021 through December 2022, over those two years, prices had exploded by 34%. From the beginning of 2023 to mid-2025, prices flattened out. But they’re now taking off again.
Over the years 2021-2025, the PPI for nonresidential construction rose by 41%. With spending on data center construction up by 344% over the same period, the red-hot construction spending boom is not a result of inflation – but of the AI investment mania.
Construction spending on manufacturing plants has soared coming out of the pandemic. In 2025, at $220 billion, it was up by 192% from 2020.
This $220 billion in 2025 is over five times the amount spent on data centers ($41 billion).
The production equipment in the plant, such as the industrial robots, is not part of the construction costs. And they’re much more costly than the building itself.
Though still running at a red-hot pace, construction spending on factories has backed off from the spike in 2024, possibly as construction resources have been pulled away by the boom in data center construction, and amid reports of bottlenecks, shortages of skilled labor, and ICE hauling off workers from construction sites.
After decades of globalization, there is now a widespread rethink underway about production in the US.
These factories will all be highly automated to where manual labor is only a relatively small part of the product costs. Every year, year after year, decade after decade, automation improves, and companies try to cut their labor costs by expanding automation.
Within factory construction, spending on factories for computers, electronic, and electrical equipment exploded by 1,300% since 2020, from $9 billion in 2020 to $104 billion in 2025. This includes semiconductor plants and plants that build electrical equipment for the AI infrastructure boom.
Powerplant construction is a highly regulated process in terms of permitting and approvals, and it takes years from the decision to build a power plant to having a functional power plant hooked to the grid.
In 2025, a record $158 billion was spent on building power plants, up by 34% from 2020.
Electricity prices have soared by 41% over the past five years as demand for electricity has surged , after being roughly flat for 14 years. This increase in demand was largely driven by the new data centers.
But utilities and power generators are leery of spending billions of dollars on generation and distribution capacity for data centers that might never work out after the AI investment mania fizzles , which would turn these investments into stranded assets.
This leeriness is fed by the many hedge funds with ag land that want a utility to commit billions of dollars to run a high-voltage powerline to it, and possibly build a power plant to supply it with power, so that the hedge fund can then sell the ag land at a huge profit as data-center ready to some hyperscaler. If that deal doesn’t happen, the utility ends up with an expensive stranded asset.
Office building construction has taken a massive hit after it became clear that office landlords were getting into serious trouble as demand for office space collapsed during the pandemic. Countless landlords defaulted on their office mortgages, and numerous buildings were seized by lenders and sold in foreclosure sales for cents on the dollar. The going rate for office building transactions is now at discounts of 30% to 70% from pre-pandemic prices. The delinquency rate for office CMBS spiked to record 12.3% in January. And there are efforts underway in expensive markets to convert office towers into residential towers, while smaller office buildings get torn down and replaced with housing. Office CRE has been in a depression since 2022 .
In a way, it seems surprising that anyone would still spend good money on office buildings, but it’s the old office towers that are in trouble, while the latest and greatest office towers see more demand from the flight to quality that high vacancy rates made possible.
So spending on office construction (not including data centers) dropped further in 2025, to $49 billion, the lowest since 2015, and down by 32% from the peak in 2020.
Some of this spending is for buildings that were planned years ago and that are being completed now. For example, JP Morgan’s $3-billion tower at 270 Park Avenue in Manhattan was announced in 2018, was formally topped off in November 2023, and had its grand opening in October 2025.
Tyler Durden Mon, 03/02/2026 - 13:20 Close
Dotsquares