CMR is the leading provider
of funding and management
support for small to
medium-sized businesses and
entrepreneurs
Established 1984 C MR
is the leading venture
capital, management
support and business
services provider for
small to medium-sized
businesses - linking
excellent management
skills with the
substantial financial
resources of a global bank
of private investors.
CMR has over 450 senior
executives, operating
in the UK, USA, Europe, Asia,
Australasia and
globally,
providing both funding and
specialist help for
entrepreneurial
businesses .
For Businesses
CMR provides excellent
resources:
CMR FundEX Business Exchange - gives all companies & entrepreneurs direct access to CMR's global investor base.
CMR Catalyst Group
Programme -
transform
profitability through
merging.
CMR Company Sales Division helps owners to exit
at the best price.
CMR Corporate Recovery
Division -
experts in rescue and
turnaround.
CMR Technology Licensing
Division -
commercialising
innovation.
CMR Executive
Professionals - management support
and consultancy.
CMR Executives-on-Demandâ„¢ Fully experienced
senior executives
available quickly and
cost effectively.
We always welcome
contact with new
business clients- please get in touch
- we will do our
best to match
your needs and exceed
your expectations.
For Investors
Preferential access to new opportunities for investment and/or acquisition
P re-vets
propositions and
provides a
personalised service
to our investors
Syndication service
enabling investors to
link together as desired
Executive and
management support for
investments as needed
CMR's services to
our investors are not
only fast & efficient
but also free
W e
always appreciate new
members- you are welcome
to join as an investor
or as a CMR Executive.
When you
join us as a Senior
Executive:
CMR's strength is in the
skills and experience of
our executive members -
all senior, director level
people with years of
successfully running and
managing companies.
Because the demand for
CMR's support and services
is ever-increasing,
especially as we enter
recessionary times, we
have a growing need for
more high calibre
executives to join us from
every industry and
discipline.
You will be using your
considerable experience to
help smaller businesses
and entrepreneurs to grow
profitably.
We offer full training
and mentoring support to
help maximise potential.
We are
always keen to find more
high calibre senior
executives in all areas-
skills and location.
Make contact with us today
and maximise your
opportunities.
HEAD
OFFICE
124 City Road
London EC1 2NX
Tel: +44 (0)207-636-1744
Fax:+44 (0)207-636-5639
Email: cmr@cmruk.com
Registered Office:
124 City Road ,
London EC1 2NX
Also Glasgow,
Dublin, Switzerland, Europe, USA/Canada
Privacy Statement: CMR only
retains personal details
supplied directly by executives
joining CMR themselves either as
Full Executive Members or
Interim Management Members or
Investors. Those details are
only used within CMR and not
disclosed to any third parties
without that person’s
agreement. We will keep that
data until requested by the
person to be removed – at that
point it will be deleted.
Personal data is never sold or
used for purposes outside of
CMR’s normal operations. Any
correspondence should be
directed to the Managing
Director, CMR,
Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London EC1V
2N
Senior Executives
CMR is a worldwide network of senior executives. Join us to expand your career and business horizons.
Business Entrepreneurs
CMR has a complete range of resources & services provided by experts to help all businesses to grow and prosper.
Investors & Venturers
CMR has a continuous stream of business and funding propositions, which are matched to investor preferences. Join us - it's FREE!
FundEX
FundEX is CMR's worldwide stock market for small to medium sized companies and entrepreneurs to raise new capital.
Interim & Permanent Management
Many of CMR's executives can be recruited on an interim, permanent or NED basis.
Login
Main CMR Intranet members only
Regional Intranets
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 18:00:00 +0000 Barclays Sees Two Key Drivers Behind A Potential Tesla Q3 Delivery Beat
Barclays Sees Two Key Drivers Behind A Potential Tesla Q3 Delivery Beat
Tesla is expected to report third-quarter earnings in late October.
Ahead of the release, Barclays autos analyst Dan Levy expects deliveries to
Read more.....
Barclays Sees Two Key Drivers Behind A Potential Tesla Q3 Delivery Beat
Tesla is expected to report third-quarter earnings in late October.
Ahead of the release, Barclays autos analyst Dan Levy expects deliveries to "beat" consensus , driven by two key factors: stronger Full Self-Driving adoption and rising exports from Shanghai.
FSD
First, FSD uptake is increasingly relevant - not only in serving as the "consumer AV" element of Tesla's AV push, but also in providing both a margin boost, and perhaps more importantly a volume boost to Tesla. Indeed, Tesla's 2Q delivery beat was in part driven by North America, and we assume that with FSD uptake of 55% in the quarter, buyers are increasingly choosing Tesla because of FSD.
Asia Demand
Tesla is increasingly benefiting from its China exports. In our visit to Giga Shanghai last week as part of our China Autos fieldtrip (see here and here), we were reminded of Tesla's significant cost advantage in Shanghai. We believe exports from Shanghai may be at least 20% of Tesla's global volume this year, and many rest-of-world markets which had previously been afterthoughts (i.e. Australia, Colombia, Asia ex-China) are now providing key volume boosts.
Levy estimates Tesla will deliver about 475,000 vehicles , above Wall Street consensus of roughly 466,000 and above his previous forecast of 450,000. However, that would represent a decline of about 4% from a year earlier and 1% from the second quarter.
Tesla is tracking toward 1.8 million deliveries for this year, up 10% from last year but back to its 2023 peak.
"We believe a solid 3Q deliveries result would be a further validation point that Tesla's vehicle growth has inflected positively, which became more evident after the significant 2Q delivery beat (480k vs cons 406k). Recall, at 2Q mgmt noted Tesla exited the quarter with its largest backlog since 2023, implying the potential for further growth ahead. We now turn to 3Q commentary for reads as to whether mgmt continues to see robust demand ahead ," Levy said.
Barclays regional TSLA deliveries forecast
Levy pointed out that a delivery beat would not translate into stronger margins . He expects automotive gross margin, excluding regulatory credits and including stock-based compensation, to remain flat or edge below the second quarter's 16.3%.
Tesla shares have slumped 18% year to date as of early Friday morning.
Wall Street analysts tracked by Bloomberg have assigned 29 "Buy" ratings, 24 "Hold" ratings and 8 "Sell" ratings, with an average 12-month price target of $391.
Looking ahead, there has been Tesla-SpaceX merger rumors this summer (read full report ).
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 14:00 Close
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 17:40:00 +0000 K-Shaped Economy: Reality Or Media-Driven Perception
K-Shaped Economy: Reality Or Media-Driven Perception
K-Shaped Economy: Reality Or Media-Driven Perception
Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,
“What the K-shaped economy gets right, what it exaggerates, and what believing the worst version is costing a generation.”
The bottom half of American households owns about 2.5% of the nation’s wealth. That number is real, and it ought to bother you. However, that number is also higher than it was in 2019 and 2015, and roughly six times higher than the 0.4% low it hit in 2011. You will not read that in many places because it doesn’t “fit the narrative.”
Unfortunately, the K-shaped economy headlines have settled into a single unvarying note, and after a while, people stop hearing anything else. I’ve spent the past several weeks working through the underlying data. While there is some truth to the coverage, most of the claims are exaggerated for “clicks and views.” But the psychological damage is clear.
So, before we get into our discussion, here are some numbers for you.
Where The K-Shaped Economy Headlines Are Right
Let me start where the “Persistent Purveyors of Doom” crowd bases its argument, as there is indeed a K-Shaped economy. However, what is critical to understand is that the K-shaped economy is not new . In every economy throughout history, there has always been a K-shaped divide between those at the bottom and those at the top.
Nonetheless, as the headlines suggest, the wage compression of 2020 through 2023 was extraordinary. Autor, Dube, and McGrew documented it in their paper “The Unexpected Compression.” The 90/10 wage ratio fell far enough to reverse roughly a third of forty years of divergence.1 Then it stopped, and worse, it began running the other way.
The Economic Policy Institute data for 2025 show that real wages at the 10th percentile fell by 0.3%, while the median rose by 0.8%.2 The lowest-paid workers in America went from the fastest-growing group in the distribution to the only one moving backward.
However, the Cleveland Fed adds a detail that should end many K-shaped economy arguments. Between 2020 and late 2025, real wages at the 10th percentile rose 9.7% against 4.5% at the 90th. In dollars, that’s $1.34 an hour against $3.09.3 Percentage compression off a small base is not catching up. And the 2015 to 2020 dollar gains were LARGER at every percentile in the bottom half than the celebrated pandemic-era gains were.
The price level is also crucial to discuss, and is where I think most commentary goes soft. Inflation falling from 9% to 3.4% is a change in the rate, not the level. Since December 2019, consumer prices have risen by roughly 29% and have stayed there. That is a permanent shift in the cost of living, and it is the part of the K-shaped economy argument that sticks, and it hits households with no assets the hardest.
As I’ve written before, “wage growth as a leading inflation indicator ” matters for policy. The level is where people actually live. McKinsey asked 30,119 Americans this April, and 60% named the cost of living as one of their top three barriers. That held even with those over $150,000 in income.
Furthermore, the hiring rate hit 3.1% in February 2026, the lowest reading outside the pandemic, while the share of unemployed workers for 27 weeks or more reached 27.5% in May. Separately, expiration of the enhanced ACA credits pushed average net marketplace premiums up 58% and average deductibles up 37% in a single year.4 That is a real, dated, 2026 hit to exactly the households everyone is arguing about.
The honest summary is that the ladder from the bottom of the K to the top got harder to climb, even as the rungs themselves stopped moving apart.
Where The K-Shaped Economy Headlines Are Exaggerated
The single most repeated statistic in this entire debate, the one anchoring roughly every set of K-shaped economy headlines you have scrolled past this year, is that the top 10% of earners account for about half of all consumer spending.
It comes from Moody’s Analytics. The number is shakier than it looks. Moody’s revised its own estimate down from 49.2% to 45.8% after a methodology change, and Mark Zandi told reporters plainly that he “wouldn’t die on the hill of the top 10% accounting for 45% of the spending.”5 Berkeley’s Antoine Levy points out the arithmetic problem: the top decile takes home 35% to 40% of disposable income and saves a fifth of it, so its spending share cannot be half. The BLS Consumer Expenditure Survey puts the figure at 22.9%.
While you may think that is just economists arguing amongst themselves, it isn’t. What is crucial to note is that when the number that anchors the entire narrative varies by a factor of two depending on who computes it, that is a problem. In other words, the narrative is doing work the data cannot support. Such is the nature of a story that has outrun its evidence.
Furthermore, the perception gap runs deeper than just one statistic. In that same McKinsey survey, 56% of consumers named food as the category with the largest price increase in 2024.6 Here is why that is important. During that same period, insurance, housing, and childcare all rose faster, meaning that people are not tracking the data.
In other words, people are tracking what they hear on television and read on social media, and the two have become detached.
Where The K-Shaped Economy Headlines Are Simply Wrong
Here is where it gets interesting.
Everyone “knows” wealth concentration is worse than ever. As I laid out in my earlier piece on the K-shaped economy and why the middle class moved up , the income story runs in the opposite direction from the coverage.
The wealth story is stranger still. Pull the Federal Reserve’s Distributional Financial Accounts and compute it yourself, and the top 10% share of household net worth peaked at 70.3% in the first quarter of 2019. It sits at 67.9% today. The bottom 50% share bottomed at 0.4% in late 2011, was 1.7% at the end of 2019, and is 2.5% now.
When looking at wealth concentrations, it is very easy to blame those at the top of the wealth pyramid. Yes, the top 10% of the population held a 31.8% share of economic wealth in the fourth quarter of 2025. Yet the bottom half gains since 2019 came almost entirely from the 90th to 99th percentiles, which fell from 39.7% to 36.3%. In plain English, the professional class lost relative ground, not the working class. Such is a detail that changes who you think is complaining.
Furthermore, the recovery that no one called K-shaped was far worse. Between 2007 and 2016, median wealth for the bottom 30% of families fell 31% while the top 10% fully recovered.7 Saez found the top 1% captured 91% of real income growth from 2009 to 2012. Nobody ran a K headline in 2013. The data was uglier then.
The last false claim is the one that worries me most, because young people believe it about themselves. That is the real damage the K-shaped economy headlines have done. Vanguard’s administrative records show 401(k) participation among young workers at 54%, against 28% for the same age group in 2004. Savings rates are higher, and average balances have roughly doubled.8 Vanguard’s own model puts 47% of Gen Z on track to sustain their standard of living in retirement, seven points ahead of the boomers. The problem is NOT that young people stopped saving
McKinsey found the same thing from the other direction. Adults aged 18 to 24 face the worst entry-level labor market in decades, and 34% name mental health as their top barrier, against 14% of older adults. Yet they were more likely than any other older group to say their finances will improve and that their lives have momentum.
“The generation everyone is writing eulogies for has not read them. “
Do The K-Shaped Economy Headlines Become Self-Fulfilling?
This is the question I actually wanted answered, so I went looking for the research. Does talking constantly about a K-shaped economy help create one? The answer splits cleanly in two, and almost nobody reports both halves.
At the level of the whole economy, no. The Chicago Fed published the number in June. The correlation between the Michigan sentiment index and annual real consumer spending growth ran 0.69 before 2020. Since 2020, it has been roughly zero.9 Their composite estimate says Michigan currently understates sentiment by 25 to 30 index points. About 10 of those points trace to the 2024 switch from telephone to online collection. Then there is the receipt test. A Fed study matched roughly 10,000 survey responses to verified purchase records. Some 43% said they were doing worse than in 2019. Most had actually bought more.
Secondly, Barsky and Sims settled the mechanism years ago: confidence is a leading indicator, not a cause.
In the economy, confidence carries information that people already have; in a survey, they respond to what they have read or seen, rather than to what they expect. This is also the structural reason why the doom loop can’t close at the macro level. Bank runs feed on themselves because if you withdraw your money, it makes my withdrawal smarter. However, in the economy, consumption lacks this property. Your neighbor skipping a vacation does nothing to make skipping yours a better idea. Such is why sentiment can collapse, and spending can increase.
At the level of one household, yes, and this is where it bites. The K-shaped economy doom loop is real. It just doesn’t run through GDP. It runs through the handful of large, irreversible decisions a person makes over a lifetime.
The clearest evidence comes from Bailey and co-authors. They matched 1.4 million Facebook users to 525,000 housing transactions, then used the house price experiences of geographically distant friends to isolate the belief channel. When distant friends saw 5 percentage points more price appreciation, a renter’s probability of buying rose 3.1 points off an 18% base.10 Beliefs picked up socially, from people nowhere near your housing market, changed whether you bought a house.
Now apply that to a young person marinating in K-shaped economy headlines. I’ve pushed back before on the lazy version of this story, the one painting a whole generation as financial nihilists . That framing is still wrong. The behavior at the margin has gotten worse anyway. Baker and colleagues at Northwestern, using transaction data on 230,000 households, found that every dollar wagered on sports betting reduces net household investment by about 99 cents. 11 Not lottery spending. Not other gambling. Savings.
The damage compounds from there. New York Fed researchers found credit card delinquency rates rising 1.02 percentage points among households under 40 in states that legalized. Furthermore, separate work by UCLA and USC estimates that roughly 30,000 additional bankruptcies a year are attributable to online betting. 12 The same restlessness shows up in the options tape. Zero-day contracts reached 65% of total SPX volume in May 2026. Citadel Securities reports that nearly half of all retail options volume on its platform now expires on the same day, up from 13% in 2021.
None of that is saving or investing, and it is the real culprit behind the “K-shaped economy” narrative. In other words, the narrative is driving behavior that is creating the outcome. As we documented in our work on why retail traders consistently underperform , the average retail equity investor earned 16.54% in 2024, compared with 25.02% for the index. The performance gap is due to behavior, not access.
While everyone agrees that the economy is hopeless for the young, the agreement itself is the tell.
What To Do About It
Are there problems in the economy? Yes. Let’s recap what we know.
But here is the real question to ask yourself, particularly if you “feel” like your future is hopeless.
“Do you have the ability to change your outcome?”
That answer is unequivocally – “yes.” You just have to be willing to do the work.
First, fix your benchmark. You are not competing with a stranger’s vacation photos or the top 1% of a country of 340 million people. The relevant comparison is your own plan, and whether this year moved you closer to it. Everything in thinking like an investor rather than a speculator starts there. McKinsey found Americans with strong community ties were nearly four times as likely to feel their lives have momentum. Only a third felt they were connected. Trade some screen time for the other thing.
Second, stop gambling and call it what it is. Nobody ever bet their way out of the K-shaped economy. Will a sports parlay occasionally pay off? Sure. Will it build wealth over 30 years? The data is very clear that it doesn’t. More notably, the ones betting are also the ones who can least afford it.
Third, set goals you can actually hit. The $1.46 million “magic number” that circulates every January is a survey artifact from a company that sells retirement products. It is not your number. The number you need to focus on comes from your spending, your timeline, and your obligations, which is a smaller and far more solvable problem than headlines imply.
Fourth, automate the boring parts. The reason that Gen Z is projected to retire better than the boomers is not superior discipline. It is auto-enrollment. Company 401 (k) plans that enroll workers by default have a 94% participation rate, compared with 64% for voluntary plans. Design beats willpower, every time.
On housing, I recently argued that home affordability is better than the headlines suggest , and that holds for the monthly payment burden. Harvard’s housing center set home prices near five times the median income, up from roughly three times in the 1990s. That is indeed a barrier to entry.
However, the down payment for homes today is 3% versus 20% in the 1990’s. So, yes, the payment is manageable once you’re in, but the hard part is saving up for the down payment. I get that, and here is the hard truth. If you can’t save up a 3% down payment, you have other financial problems (e.g., overspending) that you need to resolve first. The mortgage payment is one thing; the taxes, fees, maintenance, and everything else that goes with the joy of homeownership is quite another.
The K-shaped economy is real, and it is old. What changed isn’t the shape of the economy; it’s just that the media found a narrative that gets lots of clicks and views, and we let headlines do our thinking for us.
Believe the headlines, and you will make exactly the decisions that guarantee they come true for you.
* * *
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 13:40 Close
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 17:20:00 +0000 Auto Stocks Slide As VW Cuts Outlook, Industry Urges Trump To Keep BYD Cars Out
Auto Stocks Slide As VW Cuts Outlook, Industry Urges Trump To Keep BYD Cars Out
Earnings pressure and trade-policy uncertainty are weighing on auto stocks on Friday.
Volkswagen shares fell as much as 7.5% af
Read more.....
Auto Stocks Slide As VW Cuts Outlook, Industry Urges Trump To Keep BYD Cars Out
Earnings pressure and trade-policy uncertainty are weighing on auto stocks on Friday.
Volkswagen shares fell as much as 7.5% after the struggling European automaker lowered its operating-margin forecast, reflecting a write-down on its Porsche stake and weak Chinese demand.
Separately, US auto industry groups urged the Trump administration to maintain restrictions on Chinese vehicles, according to a Bloomberg report.
"Allowing them to open a domestic facility would provide a foothold in the US market at the expense of manufacturers operating here," the coalition wrote.
Signatories include the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, whose members include Ford, General Motors, Toyota and Volkswagen, alongside Autos Drive America, the American Automotive Policy Council and the National Automobile Dealers Association.
The letter to the White House, seen by Bloomberg, comes less than a week before President Trump meets with Chinese leader Xi Jinping next Thursday. It warns that a flood of Chinese BYD vehicles would undercut and upend domestic automakers and parts suppliers.
Europe's move to welcome BYD has been nothing but trouble for the continent, which is seeing its industrial base hollowed out further.
The S&P 500 Automobiles & Components Index remains in a descending channel.
In US markets, General Motors shares fell 5% this morning, their steepest intraday decline since June, as selling spread across the auto sector. Ford dropped 4%, while Stellantis' US-listed shares slid 5%.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 13:20 Close
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 17:01:00 +0000 Yen Jumps On Report Of BOJ "Rate Check" But It's "Too Little Too Late"
Yen Jumps On Report Of BOJ "Rate Check" But It's "Too Little Too Late"
Update: (12:40pm ET)
The Bank of Japan, not to mentioned Scott "the House" Bessent, have been most displeased with the
Read more.....
Yen Jumps On Report Of BOJ "Rate Check" But It's "Too Little Too Late"
Update: (12:40pm ET)
The Bank of Japan, not to mentioned Scott "the House" Bessent, have been most displeased with the yen plunge following today's BOJ rate hike, and so they once again do what they do pretty much every other week now: intervene in the market.
As we said earlier (see below) when we predicted that some sort of central bank intervention was inevitable, the yen pared declines on Friday after Japan's Nikkei newspaper reported that the Bank of Japan had conducted a rate check in the foreign-exchange market.
Just as it was intended, the report immediately reversed some of the yen’s huge losses triggered earlier in the session by disappointment among traders who had wanted clearer guidance from the central bank on its plans to raise borrowing costs further to stabilize inflation, following a widely expected rate increase on Friday. Instead, what they got were two dissenters appointed by the ultradovish Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, with two more members due to leave the board next year and likely also replaced by more dovish policymakers, thus kneecapping expectations for more rate hikes.
Such intervention is meant to squeeze speculative yen shorts and accelerate a move in thin markets, but its ability to produce a lasting reversal may depend on monetary policy. The Fed’s renewed tightening cycle threatens to keep the US-Japan rate differential wide even after Friday’s BOJ rate increase, preserving the incentive for investors to borrow in yen to fund higher-yielding positions elsewhere.
Speculative positioning is also lighter than before the previous intervention. Leveraged funds halved their bearish yen bets in the week through Sept. 8, according to CFTC data, leaving fewer short positions to squeeze if authorities step in again.
The Japanese currency was down 0.6% at 156.83 per dollar at about 12:30 p.m. ET after losing as much as 1.3% earlier in the session. The Nikkei reported that the BOJ inquired with market participants about exchange-rate levels, without saying where it got the information. Such a move has previously preceded official intervention.
“This is too little, too late,” said Win Thin, chief economist at Bank of Nassau 1982. “The BOJ had another chance to go big and they missed it, same as July. If they really wanted to boost the yen, they should have hiked more than expected and then intervene massively.”
As reported earlier, the yen had weakened to about 158 per dollar after BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda sent mixed signals on the path for future rate hikes following the bank’s widely expected increase. While he said the stage for policy setting has shifted, he also said it was difficult to determine the terminal rate for the current tightening cycle. Analysts saw his remarks as falling short of the market’s increasingly hawkish expectations.
Japan has entered a holiday period through next Wednesday, when thinner liquidity could amplify the impact of any official intervention. Authorities used a similar window around the Golden Week holiday period this year, first stepping in after the yen weakened beyond 160 just before the holidays and then apparently intervening again during the thinly traded period.
Of course, neither of the previous interventions worked, and this one will fail as well.
Japan and the US conducted a coordinated yen-buying operation this summer, the first since 1998, raising the stakes for traders betting against the yen. Japan spent a record ¥15.4 trillion on intervention in the month through Aug. 26, according to Finance Ministry data. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has since continued to signal support for a stronger yen.
Despite the coordinate global attempts to boost the yen, the fundamental pressures weighing on the yen remain in place, including Japan’s wide interest-rate gap with other major economies, concerns over the fiscal outlook under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s expansionary spending plans, and - of course - the biggest debt load in history, where every rate hike will lead to much more interest expense.
* * *
Earlier:
The yen sank to a two-week low against the dollar ?on Friday after two policy makers at the Bank of Japan dissented from a widely expected decision to raise ?interest rates, extinguishing expectations for back-to-back hikes. Governor Kazuo Ueda now needs, at a minimum, to preserve expectations for a December move to prevent markets from unwinding most if note all of the tightening path already priced into rates.
While Japanese policymakers pushed rates to their highest level in 31 years at 1.25%, the move failed to boost the currency as traders felt there was a lack of explicitly hawkish guidance .
As a result of the dovish split, the yen tumbled and the US dollar rose more than 1.2% against the Japanese currency, hitting a a ?two-week high of 158.07 yen after wavering during BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda's press conference. It was set for its biggest daily increase versus the ?yen since December and the largest weekly rally since September 2024.
Traders had already discounted the equivalent of another hike by year-end before today’s policy meeting, leaving a high bar for any hawkish surprise. The presence of two dissenters signals that support for another rate increase in October is weakening, with OIS assigning around a 20% probability to such an outcome. That leaves Ueda’s press conference carrying the burden of preserving expectations for a December hike and keeping the BOJ on a tightening path that at least matches the Fed’s recent pace.
"They've just clearly underwhelmed versus expectations here ," ?said Ray Attrill, head of FX strategy at National Australia Bank in Sydney. "And I think that one of the more staggering aspects ?of it was that they couldn't even get the unanimous vote for that," he said. "That really raised eyebrows in the market."
"The statement offered little additional hawkish guidance to support ?bullish Japanese yen positions," said Frantisek Taborsky, currency strategist at ING. "The dissent from (Toichiro) Asada and (Ayano) Sato points to resistance against the fastest pace of rate ?increases in ?more than three decades and suggests they may increasingly act as a brake on further tightening."
According to Mizuho strategists, the dissenters raise concerns that further rate hikes become harder to deliver, potentially steepening the JGB yield curve. Senior strategist Masayuki Nakajima said that Friday’s two dissenters were appointed by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. Two more members are due to leave the board next year and could potentially be replaced by more dovish policymakers
“Should their successors come from the reflationist camp, four of the nine Board members would become dovish,” he says; “While that would still fall short of a majority, it could reinforce expectations that sustaining the tightening cycle may become more difficult in the future”
“If so, concerns that the BOJ is falling behind the curve could re-emerge, potentially leading to further curve steepening,” he added.
Commenting on the market reaction, Bloomberg's Ven Ram said that the decision was:
marred by dissent from two policymakers who voted against the hike;
there was none who called for a bigger margin of increase;
and the accompanying statement, while vowing to continue raising rates, failed to signal a sense of urgency by not saying when they will come.
Japan’s benchmark rate still trails the neutral rate by a considerable margin , and without back-to-back interest-rate hikes, the yen will stay weaker for longer. Only the franc carries a lower interest rate in the G-10 economies, with the Swiss central bank due to meet next week. Should that monetary authority reiterate its preference for keeping rates at zero, it will engender low volatility in two of the major exchange rates that represent the preferred funding currencies.
After a slew of central bank meetings and with Brent crude headed for the first weekly decline this month, global bonds that were deeply oversold are finding some respite. Longer-dated gilts received a boost from the Bank of England’s plan to pause bond sales and stop selling securities that mature in 2049 or later. Gilts with a maturity of 30 years stand to benefit considerably, so an immediate follow-through of Thursday’s rally is likely even though the looming autumn budget realities may check the pace of gains.
Here are some other reactions to the split BOJ decision from Wall Street traders:
NAKA MATSUZAWA, CHIEF MACRO STRATEGIST, NOMURA SECURITIES, TOKYO:
"It's (the yen's decline) a knee-jerk reaction to the two dissent votes. The bottom line is I think it's not too hard for the BOJ to keep the currency pricing for market expectations of rate hikes, basically every three months. And I do think that's what the BOJ wants to keep, not necessarily suggesting an October hike."
RAY ATTRILL, HEAD OF CURRENCY STRATEGY, NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK, SYDNEY:
"They've just clearly underwhelmed versus expectations here. And I think that one of the more staggering aspects of it ?was that they couldn't even get the unanimous vote for that. I think that really raised eyebrows in the market. (There was) nothing to put the market more firmly on the sense of another increase in Q4. It's clearly on Governor Ueda to put the market back more firmly on that stance. If he fails to do that, then I think dollar-yen is headed higher. It's hard ?to believe that just on the back of one quarter-point the (US) Treasury Secretary is going to be jumping for joy and as willing to replicate what they did in August (by intervening). The risk here is that we're heading back up to 160."
BART WAKABAYASHI, BRANCH MANAGER, STATE STREET, TOKYO:
"They raise rates and the currency loses 100 points - I think the market is looking at the BOJ versus the G3 and G10 central banks and the interest rate spread is what is in play. I think it's important that the six-month cycle has been broken, and that leaves the market to say, hey, these guys are willing to act if they have to."But there is a factor where they need to keep up (with other central banks)...if (Ueda) is not as hawkish as the Fed (at the news conference), dollar/yen could really take off higher."
DAVID CHAO, GLOBAL MARKET STRATEGIST FOR ASIA-PACIFIC, INVESCO, SINGAPORE:
"The BOJ has finally shed its long-term status as a monetary policy outlier and is joining the ranks of the other major central banks. The market fully anticipated this rate hike, but it has to be taken in context with what's going on with ?the rest of the world. The BOJ, Fed and ECB have all hiked rates in the same month."
MASAHIKO LOO, SENIOR FIXED INCOME STRATEGIST, STATE STREET INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, TOKYO:
"Markets should focus less on the statement and more on Ueda's press conference. Expect a neutral-to-slightly hawkish tone, emphasizing that every meeting remains 'live' from here given resilient growth, persistent inflation risks and a policy rate (real yield) that remains accommodative even at 1.25%.More broadly, Japan is ?increasingly participating in a synchronized global tightening cycle. The debate is no longer whether the BOJ hikes, but how far rates ultimately go as major central banks continue to grapple with sticky inflation, AI-driven investment demand and rising term premium. Combined with higher domestic yields and growing confidence in the BOJ's normalization path, more capital is likely to ?stay in Japan rather than flow abroad. The bigger story remains that Japan is gradually ceasing to be a marginal buyer of foreign assets, not because it is selling aggressively, but because domestic alternatives are becoming more attractive."
CAROL KONG, CURRENCY STRATEGIST, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, SYDNEY:
"The fact that two BOJ board members appointed by Takaichi opposed a hike today suggests the government still leans against BOJ rate hikes. This, together with the lack of guidance on the future pace of ?tightening in the statement, triggered a sell-off in the JPY. As usual, Governor Ueda’s post-meeting press conference will provide more insights into the rate outlook. The risk is Ueda fails to match markets’ hawkish expectations, fuelling further JPY weakness. We expect a follow-up hike in December."
YUGO TSUBOI, CHIEF STRATEGIST, DAIWA SECURITIES, TOKYO:
"Overall, the decision is likely to be seen as dovish. There had been some concern, albeit limited, about a 50-basis-point rate hike, but that did not happen. With two dissenting votes, markets likely ?took the view that it would be difficult to assume the pace of rate hikes will accelerate rapidly. U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent's negative comments on reflationary policy had also raised concerns about the potential economic damage from the BOJ becoming more hawkish than previously expected. Those concerns have receded, prompting a rise in stocks."
SHUN HONG LIU, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, HONG INVESTMENT ADVISORS, HONG KONG:
“Honestly, it is so hard to have a very strong view in this market, given things are so political everywhere else in the world. Just imagine Japan needing to get consent from the US for intervention—what can be done and what cannot be done will be coordinated by so many politicians . Last week, if you had asked me, I would have answered yes, it is the end of the yen carry trade (after the rate hike). But now I would answer no, as Takaichi confirms a 3.5% military spending target, while people suddenly believe that Warsh is an uber-hawk. So I just keep my eyes open and trade accordingly."
KANAKO NAKAMURA, ECONOMIST, DAIWA INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH, TOKYO:
"The expected dissent by two members suggests political pressure ?on the BOJ has not entirely faded. The reappointment of Minister Kiuchi in the cabinet reshuffle also signals continued support for expansionary fiscal policy, raising concerns that fiscal stimulus could add to inflation pressures."While the BOJ's statement showed readiness to address upside inflation risks, Governor Ueda's press conference will be key for assessing the future pace of rate hikes.With producer prices remaining elevated, oil prices rising on Middle East tensions, and a weak yen adding to inflation risks, we do ?not believe this rate hike alone will be sufficient. We expect the BOJ to accelerate rate hikes to roughly once a quarter."
PRASHANT NEWNAHA, SENIOR RATES STRATEGIST, TD SECURITIES, SINGAPORE:
"No real surprises from the BOJ decision to hike the target rate 25bps to 1.25%, and neither was the 7-2 split, with recent Takaichi appointees Sato and Asada voting against the hike. The statement retains most of the hawkish tone from the July Statement noting 'accommodative financial conditions are expected to be maintained' even after the hike, and the ?Bank 'will continue to raise the policy ?interest rate'. The Bank reiterated its concerns that underlying inflation could deviate upwards from its 2% target, but we don’t see a smoking gun supporting a back to back hike in October. We stick with our call for rate hikes roughly every quarter with the next 25bps hike in December."
TOHRU SASAKI, CHIEF STRATEGIST, FUKUOKA FINANCIAL GROUP AND FORMER BOJ OFFICIAL, TOKYO:
"It's a little bit surprising to see that the yen weakened after the announcement. Maybe some market participants were expecting intervention like the last time before and after the BOJ's decision.Probably some were surprised because two members opposed the decision and maybe some were expecting some mention of a 50 basis point hike. It's a bit difficult to meet market expectations. Ueda-san has to be very hawkish to keep the yen from depreciating, but I think it's a bit difficult for him to be so hawkish. He has to say that the BOJ will probably hike the policy rate again within this year. But I think it's difficult for him to say, so the market will take it as a dovish press conference."
ANTHONY MALOUF, EBURY, SYDNEY:
"The seven-to-two vote is a touch wider than a clean hawkish consensus would suggest. Dissenters Asada Toichiro and Sato Ayano argued that inflation and growth have not accelerated enough to justify tightening now. The more telling split, though, sits elsewhere. Board members Takata Hajime and Tamura Naoki opposed the outlook language from the opposite direction, arguing underlying inflation has already reached a level consistent with ?the 2% target, which points to appetite for a faster pace rather than a slower one. The yen sold off ?after the decision. We interpret this as markets focusing on the two dissents, suggesting the board is ?less united behind a faster pace than the vote count alone implies, rather than doubting the hike itself. That fits our own view that the BOJ will deliver further hikes at a steady quarterly pace, with the next move in December and another in the first quarter of 2027, taking the policy rate to its neutral level near 1.75%."
KENTO MINAMI, SENIOR ECONOMIST AT DAIWA SECURITIES, TOKYO:
"The overall impression of the statement was dovish. BOJ’s new board members Ayano Sato and Toichiro Asada dissented from the decision. They were chosen by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, which suggests difficulties in raising rates in the future as the BOJ will have new board members going forward. "The statement indicated that the BOJ would raise rates at least ?once every six months, but this was in line with market expectations that the BOJ would raise rates every three months. These two dissenters were a dovish factor, which is why the yen started falling right after the decision."
MASATO KOIKE, SENIOR ECONOMIST, SOMPO INSTITUTE PLUS, TOKYO:
"I think the statement was hawkish, but markets had expected something ?even more hawkish, which is why the yen weakened after the announcement. "What ?struck me as hawkish was the explicit reference to accommodative financial conditions, and the wording that the BOJ will continue to adjust the degree of monetary easing. It also clearly mentioned upside risks. In addition, the BOJ cited a range of factors — not just crude oil, but price increases linked to AI-related demand, the weaker yen, and the mutually reinforcing mechanism between wages and prices. Those elements made the decision look hawkish overall. I don't think (Sato joining Asada in dissent) will have an impact when it comes to the pace of rate hikes being delayed. Sato's dissent was in line with expectations, but I see it as opposition to the timing or pace rather than a blanket objection to rate hikes. It did not come across as outright opposition, which I think is positive for the BOJ as it proceeds with further rate increases."
HIROFUMI SUZUKI, CHIEF FX STRATEGIST, SMBC, TOKYO:
"The rate hike itself was in line with market expectations, but the two dissenting votes came as a modest surprise, as only some market participants ?had anticipated them. The outcome has somewhat ?tempered expectations for further rate hikes and conveyed a dovish impression. The pace of future rate hikes is likely to depend primarily on the views of the BOJ's leadership. We therefore do not expect the pace to differ significantly from current market expectations.The yen initially weakened following the ?decision, but attention now turns to Governor Ueda's inflation outlook and policy stance at the press conference."
FRED NEUMANN, CHIEF ASIA ECONOMIST, HSBC, HONG KONG:
"The tone of the statement, along with two dissenters on the decision to raise rates, leaves lingering doubts that Japan’s central bank will be cautious in tightening monetary policy further. In addition, new inflation numbers out this morning for August showed that price pressures remained unchanged in August, rather than accelerate. All eyes are now on the press conference to be held by Governor Ueda, with the market looking for hawkish reassurances that the BOJ is prepared ?to raise rates again soon. While back-to-back hikes appear unlikely, investors will look for clues as to whether officials are prepared to raise interest rates again in December. Given that the Fed has tilted into a more hawkish direction, the pressure remains for the BOJ to follow suit: Governor Ueda will have to follow-up today's rate hike with by keeping the door open for another hike before the end of the year."
Sellside reactions aside, Governor Kazuo Ueda said that with the price trend very close to the bank’s 2% target, authorities now need to ensure inflation doesn’t overshoot.
“It has become important to stabilize the rate of price increases at a level of around 2%,” Ueda said in a post-decision briefing. “In that sense, I believe the phase of policy has shifted to a new stage.” The bank should act preemptively to avoid being forced into a situation where rapid hikes might become unavoidable, he added.
Traders also remained ?alert to the risk of intervention to prop up the currency after Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama said Tokyo won't hesitate to conduct further coordinated action, following a joint US-Japan move to boost the yen in late July.
The yen rallied sharply in early September to its highest since February as traders bet the BOJ ?would embark on multiple rate hikes, although those wagers came under question on Friday.
The dollar rally against the yen helped the DXY dollar index climb 0.25% to 100.48, as broader currency markets remained focused on energy prices and the U.S. Federal Reserve. The index, which tracks the ?currency against six major peers, was ?up 1.4% for the week to ?around a six-week high after the US Federal Reserve hiked interest rates on Wednesday and signaled more increases could be coming.
Traders now see a roughly 55% chance of a quarter-point hike at the Fed's next ?two-day meeting next month, up from 27% a week ago, according to the CME Group's FedWatch ?tool.
Finally, it's worth noting that the BOJ dissenters directly jeopardized the plan of Steve Bessent for a stronger yen (and thus less fears of TSY selling to prop up the yen through intervention). According to Bloomberg, Warsh should "seriously consider a little Friday afternoon intervention to ensure that this bounce in USD/JPY makes a lower high than the prior ascent to just over 160."
Of course, the problem with constant meddling in market prices is the risk that the market tests you, forcing ever-more frequent action to keep things in line. At the very least anyone who stayed with the short-dollar trade has received a painful kick in the shin, which arguably will dissuade some punters from staying in the position the next time that the authorities step in.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 13:01 Close
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:40:00 +0000 Chinese DRAM Giant Enters Booming Flash Memory Market To Take On Samsung, SanDisk
Chinese DRAM Giant Enters Booming Flash Memory Market To Take On Samsung, SanDisk
Chinese chipmaking giant, CXMT, and the biggest IPO of the decade in the mainland market, is preparing to enter the booming flash memory ?chip
Read more.....
Chinese DRAM Giant Enters Booming Flash Memory Market To Take On Samsung, SanDisk
Chinese chipmaking giant, CXMT, and the biggest IPO of the decade in the mainland market, is preparing to enter the booming flash memory ?chip market dominated by Samsung Electronics and other foreign rivals, Reuters reported citing sources, a move that would broaden ?its customer base amid a global memory shortage.
The move would also pit the dynamic random access memory (DRAM) chip specialist against domestic rival YMTC, taking it into one of the semiconductor industry's fastest-growing segments.
The relentless, debt-fueled demand from AI servers (where ROI remains deeply negative) has created a global memory shortage that industry executives believe will persist through at least 2027. SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-jung said in July that 2027 ?could be the industry's worst year from a supply perspective, while TrendForce expects NAND supply tightness to ease only in the second half of next ?year, unless of course the bond market cracks first at which point all the hyperscalers will simply run out of money to buy massively overpriced DRAM and flash memory... which it will now that global yields are at decade highs.
Manufacturers have also prioritized capital spending on DRAM and high-bandwidth memory, or HBM, limiting additions to NAND flash capacity, according to ?TrendForce, worsening shortages in this segment. DRAM provides the working memory used by processors, while NAND stores data in phones, computers and data centres. Both have seen costs explode in recent months, making memory the biggest cost driver of electronics purchases, with Goldman forecasting that memory prices will singlehandedly raise core PCE by 0.5% .
CXMT, also known as ChangXin ?Memory Technologies, plans to establish a research-and-development production line for NAND flash memory at its new plant in Beijing, according to the report; the company has ?also set up a research institute in the Chinese capital and projects there include NAND development, one source said.
CXMT has discussed its NAND plans with customers, including a newly established startup that intends to buy its NAND chips for storage products used in AI systems and supercomputers.
Samsung was the world's biggest NAND supplier ?by revenue ?in the second quarter with a 28% share, according to research firm Counterpoint. SK Hynix ranked second, followed by Micron. China's YMHT recently surpassed Sandisk, and is now tied with Japan's Kioxia for 4th spot in NAND marketshare. It will likely overtake Micron next quarter.
CXMT and YMTC, known in China as the "twin stars" of the country's memory-chip industry, have largely operated in separate markets. CXMT dominates Chinese production of DRAM, while YMTC is the country's leading NAND manufacturer.
However, thanks to the biggest memory bubble in history, those lines have begun to blur. In April, Reuters reported that YMTC had sent low-power DRAM samples to customers as it weighed entry into CXMT's core market.
And now CXMT is entering the NAND market.
While ?the two firms lag behind larger international ?rivals and are more exposed to ?lower-priced products, they are growing at a blistering pace as tight supplies have strengthened their pricing power with some Chinese customers. In some cases, they have charged more than their foreign competitors, Reuters reported in July.
Both companies have emerged as key pillars of Beijing's drive to build a self-sufficient chip industry ?and close the gap in strategic technologies like AI. They grew with backing from China's national semiconductor fund and local ?governments. CXMT expanded with ?backing from Hefei, the provincial capital of Anhui province, in eastern China, while YMTC was built in Wuhan, the provincial capital of central Hubei province, reflecting competition among Chinese local governments to attract strategic industries through investment and incentives.
CXMT, which raised 57.92 billion yuan ($8.6 billion) in July in Asia's biggest initial public offering this year, plans a second memory-chip plant ?in Beijing and ?was in funding talks with a tech manufacturing hub backed by the local government, Reuters reported last ?month. YMTC's parent, CCSH, is also planning a Shanghai listing that aims to raise 33 billion yuan.
Washington's export restrictions have added urgency to China's drive to develop domestic memory suppliers. Washington placed YMTC on its Entity List ?in 2022 and later tightened China's access to HBM chips that are used alongside AI processors.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 12:40 Close
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:20:00 +0000 "Good Manners" Have Never Been An Effective Strategy For Retaining Sovereignty
"Good Manners" Have Never Been An Effective Strategy For Retaining Sovereignty
By Molly Schwartz, cross-asset macro strategist at Rabobank
10-year Treasury yields slid lower over yesterday’s session, retracing more
Read more.....
"Good Manners" Have Never Been An Effective Strategy For Retaining Sovereignty
By Molly Schwartz, cross-asset macro strategist at Rabobank
10-year Treasury yields slid lower over yesterday’s session, retracing more than 9bps from Wednesday’s post-FOMC high of 5.02, with much of the move seemingly driven by falling oil prices, as Brent crude oil sank $3.5 to intraday lows below $102/bbl before retracing to $104/bbl. The UST yield curve has continued flattening, albeit in a bull-flattening fashion, as 2-year yields were dragged lower by almost 7bp. Given recent US economic data suggestive of a stronger-than-previously-thought labor market and hotter-than-preferred inflation, we maintain that the risk to our FOMC view of continued holds through year-end is skewed in favor of one hike this year, but believe that market-implied pricing of between one and two additional hikes in 2027 is unlikely (Read more about our FOMC view from Rabobank’s Fed whisperer, Philip Marey, here ).
Politico reported yesterday that a trade deal is on the horizon between the US and Mexico, as some pointed to a recent call between Trump and Sheinbaum. An unnamed official said that “US-Mexico talks are active and continue to move in a positive direction…any notion that the call didn’t go well is wrong,” though “another person familiar with the call” referred to it as “so-so” and said that it “created a bit of noise.”
To those who have been following the trade negotiations between the US and Canada, this may feel uncomfortably similar to the days before the US-Canada trade relationship deteriorated completely in late August. However, Mexico already seems far better positioned to emerge with a favorable trade deal, simply by avoiding the headlines. While USD/MXN has recently been trading above the 17 level, we believe that trade progress remains constructive for the MXN and see continued resilience.
But the relationship between the US and Canada is only eroding further. Trump recently signed a Presidential Memorandum to “identify and take steps in response to Canada’s measures that have denied US firms access to Canada’s federal and provincial procurement markets.” This comes as Carney spoke to the EU Parliament in Strasbourg yesterday , further clarifying his position on where he sees middle powers fitting in an increasingly bifurcated world. He said that he is “not proposing a third bloc in order to become a great power rival, only with better manners …we are pursuing resilience so that no one, no one, can control our open markets, impair our sovereignty, threaten our territorial integrity, or undermine our freedoms .”
It should be noted that good manners have never been proven to be an effective strategy for retaining sovereignty . Carney also clarified that Canada is not seeking to become a “full member” of the European Union, while Canada’s EU ambassador-designate, Jonathan Wilkinson, asserted that Canada wants to “get as close as [it] possibly can to the EU without giving up significant chunks of sovereignty.”
Speaking of non-EU members, the Bank of England announced its decision to hold Bank Rate unchanged at 3.75% in a 6-3 vote. Rabobank’s BoE whisperer, Stefan Koopman, highlights in a Bank of England Comment that there is a case for the Bank to tighten borrowing conditions further, suggesting that November is a live meeting. Rabobank is forecasting a 25bp hike at the November meeting, assuming that the Autumn Budget is well absorbed. (Read more here ).
* * *
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 12:20 Close
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:00:00 +0000 Ukrainian Drone Hits Russian Nuclear Plant Days After Trump Energy Truce Plea
Ukrainian Drone Hits Russian Nuclear Plant Days After Trump Energy Truce Plea
Ukrainian Drone Hits Russian Nuclear Plant Days After Trump Energy Truce Plea
President Trump raised eyebrows when on Monday he declared that Russia and Ukraine had agreed to stop attacking each other's oil and energy infrastructure, amid global crude and diesel supply problems related mostly to the Hormuz Strait crisis.
But then within days later it became clear that the default reality on the ground has persisted, as energy sites continue to get pummeled . And it's not only refineries and ports which have continued getting hit, but as of Thursday morning a Russian nuclear plant was apparently targeted in a Ukrainian drone attack .
Kursk Nuclear Power Plant, file image
A drone hit the cooling tower of a reactor unit at Russia's Kursk Nuclear Power Plant , the International Atomic Energy Agency has announced Friday.
The unit was operating at the time , but its operating mode was unchanged and no fire broke out.
The UN agency's director Rafael Grossi declared in a statement that "all attacks on nuclear facilities are unacceptable as they could endanger nuclear safety and security, irrespective of where they occur."
He urged "maximum military restraint to prevent the risk of a nuclear accident " - which remains a top dangerous reality of the battlefield in the context of the Ukraine war.
In early July the same site had suffered a prior drone attack from Ukraine. One industry source reviews :
The Kursk Nuclear Power Plant (Kursk NPP) has been the target of several military actions and drone strikes. The most notable incident occurred in August 2025 when a drone detonated and damaged an auxiliary transformer, sparking a structural fire that had to be contained by emergency teams. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) monitored the event and confirmed that radiation levels remained normal.
The Kremlin going back to 2024 has accused Ukrainian forces of seeking a 'provocation' at the Kursk nuclear plant.
The Kursk Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) lies about 25 miles west of the city of Kursk, which is the administrative center of the oblast by the same name.
The plant continues to be a major electricity producer for Russia . Kremlin officials have long voiced alarm that Ukraine may seek to use some major provocation to draw its backers in NATO deeper into the conflict.
Apparently on Ukraine's target bank going back years...
As a reminder, Trump began the week by declaring on Truth Social, "Ukraine has agreed not to hit Russian Energy targets. Russia has agreed to do , likewise! The World’s Diesel price rise is mostly caused by the Russia/ Ukraine War, not Iran." ...So much for that.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 12:00 Close
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:40:00 +0000 Researchers Used Claude To Hack OpenAI Employee Accounts
Researchers Used Claude To Hack OpenAI Employee Accounts
Three security researchers used Anthropic's Claude to breach OpenAI employee accounts and gain access to private company software in a July attack th
Read more.....
Researchers Used Claude To Hack OpenAI Employee Accounts
Three security researchers used Anthropic's Claude to breach OpenAI employee accounts and gain access to private company software in a July attack that began with an image upload to the company's public help forum.
The researchers, Harsh Jaiswal, Mohan Pedhapati and Rahul Maini of Hacktron AI , described the July 25 breach in a report published September 13. They said the work took less than 72 hours from the initial discovery to demonstrating access to an internal OpenAI software repository. OpenAI subsequently paid them a $6,500 bounty.
The disclosure follows a separate incident earlier in July in which OpenAI's own AI agents escaped a testing environment and attacked Hugging Face, a platform used to host AI models and datasets. In that case, OpenAI says the agents took dangerous actions that weren't directed by a human - the incident being used to spook everyone into letting far-left technocommies run AI oversight .
Hacktron's team directed its own operation , reported the vulnerabilities to OpenAI and stopped after demonstrating access.
How A Forum Upload Reached Internal Software
The entry point was OpenAI's public discussion forum, which runs on software supplied by Discourse (3rd party software that manages discussion boards). A flaw in an image-processing component called libheif allowed a specially crafted image upload to make the server execute the researchers' instructions. Discourse's security advisory confirms the vulnerability required no interaction from a victim.
Hacktron said the faulty code had been changed in 2025, but the change was not identified as a security fix. The forum was still running a vulnerable version.
Illustration via Hacktron
That gave the researchers access to the forum, but a second flaw turned the intrusion into something more serious.
OpenAI's shared sign-in system allowed people to use their OpenAI identity on the forum. The researchers found that the forum's sign-in tokens, digital credentials that keep users authenticated, carried permissions extending beyond the discussion site. A compromised forum session could therefore become a route into that person's ChatGPT and Codex accounts.
One employee's Codex account was already connected to OpenAI's private GitHub software repositories. The researchers used that account to have Codex submit a harmless proposed documentation change, known as a pull request, to an internal repository. A pull request proposes an edit for review; it does not, by itself, install a change in live company systems.
The researchers said they deliberately avoided inspecting sensitive code and halted testing after submitting the demonstration.
AI Accelerated The Exploit
Hacktron said an earlier Claude model produced a partially working exploit but struggled to make it function with the target's normal security protections in place. After Anthropic released Opus 5, the newer model produced a working version within hours. The company had access to Anthropic's program for authorized cybersecurity researchers, which relaxes some restrictions, its chief executive told Business Insider .
According to the company, skilled human guidance remained important - while AI reduced the time needed to turn a software flaw into an actual, reliable attack. According to Hacktron's timeline, OpenAI confirmed its sign-in fix roughly 14 hours after the initial report. Discourse separately patched the vulnerable image-processing component and added stronger isolation around image processing.
"We narrowed the permissions on Community sign-in tokens and revoked affected tokens and sessions," OpenAI said .
OpenAI also clarified that the $6,500 reward covered the flaw on its side of the sign-in system. Testing against the Discourse-hosted forum was explicitly excluded from its bounty program.
The Separate Attack By OpenAI's Own Agents
The Hugging Face intrusion arose from OpenAI's internal cybersecurity testing earlier in July . OpenAI was evaluating agents that could write code, use software tools and take multiple steps toward a goal, rather than simply answer a user's questions.
To measure their hacking capabilities, OpenAI deliberately reduced certain safeguards that normally restrict dangerous cyber activity. The agents were nevertheless supposed to remain inside isolated testing environments, without open internet access. The models involved included GPT-5.6 Sol and an internal research prototype that was not intended for public release.
According to OpenAI , the agents exploited a previously unknown vulnerability in a service used to download software packages. That provided a route to the internet. They also repurposed the shared service as an unauthorized message board, allowing agents that were supposed to work separately to exchange discoveries and coordinate. An independent investigation by METR (oh... ) and Redwood Research found that roughly 1,200 agents used the message board, exchanging more than 70,000 messages and files. About 700 participated in the attack on Hugging Face.
The agents were trying to cheat a cybersecurity test called ExploitGym. METR's investigation concluded that the Hugging Face attack appeared primarily motivated by understanding how the test's automated scoring system worked, rather than simply stealing an answer key. That information could help the agents fool the evaluator instead of completing the assigned challenges as intended.
The investigators also found agents that recognized the attack was outside their assigned task and unethical, but participated anyway.
Hugging Face reconstructed roughly 17,600 attacker actions between July 9 and July 13, including many unsuccessful attempts. It said the volume and persistence of the activity complicated detection: successful attacks were mixed into thousands of failed attempts across different systems.
OpenAI's report dates the compromise of Hugging Face's production infrastructure to July 11-13. OpenAI detected suspicious activity in its own environment on July 19 and publicly disclosed its responsibility on July 21, four days before Hacktron demonstrated its separate breach.
* * *
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 11:40 Close
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:20:00 +0000 South Korean President Announces No Military Support To US Hormuz Mission
South Korean President Announces No Military Support To US Hormuz Mission
South Korea has belatedly made a big decision after starting months ago it found itself among key Washington allies directly called upon by President Trump to
Read more.....
South Korean President Announces No Military Support To US Hormuz Mission
South Korea has belatedly made a big decision after starting months ago it found itself among key Washington allies directly called upon by President Trump to provide urgent security help for Strait of Hormuz energy transit, amid the war with Iran.
President Lee Jae Myung has on Friday announced he will ?not deploy the military to the ?Middle East , though his statement also suggested troops could play a role on the peripheries of the conflict.
August 2025: President Trump meets with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung at the Oval Office, Reuters.
Resisting direct calls from Trump to support the campaign against Iran, Lee made clear to a news conference: "There won’t be deployment that would involve or enter war. I can tell you that very clearly . We won’t deploy military assets in any form to that end ."
"It is also clear that we must do the minimum as other countries do to ?protect our commercial shipping and crude shipments, and also the safety of ?our people," he said. At the moment, the South Korean Navy only conducts patrols off the coast of Somali as part of international anti-piracy efforts .
Lee's words did seem to leave open a potential greater future role in terms of South Korea safeguarding global shipping in the region, but it would obviously be significantly away from the potential reach of any Iranian missile or drones, or that of their proxies.
This is a long-awaited decision. While Europe and basically the whole rest of the world has rejected Trump calls to send military assets to assist in opening the Strait of Hormuz, South Korea is in a tougher spot given the many decades-long, large American troop presence on the peninsula, safeguarding the south from possible attack from North Korea. The country is also effectively under America's nuclear protection umbrella.
Last week, Lee's press secretary stated the government had not yet finalized its policy but was "cautiously assessing it".
But then it got a warning from Tehran . Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baqaei warned on X on Sept.7. "The military presence or operational participation of other nations in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz would inevitably be viewed as direct support for the party committing acts of aggression , and would lead to serious consequences ."
And so Seoul has found itself diplomatically between a rock and a hard place :
Trump has criticized Seoul for what he called insufficient support for the Iran war and scaled back major joint military drills by the two countries’ armed forces this summer, a move that unsettled the U.S. ally .
Committing South Korean troops to the Gulf region has also seemed unpopular among the Korean populace. Rare anti-war protests have been going strong this month in front of the US Embassy in Seoul.
Locals have at times carried signs that read "Do Not Join a War of Aggression" and "No Military Deployment to Hormuz," while protesters have chanted, "We cannot send our young people into a sea of death," according to prior descriptions by the AFP.
Not going to appease Washington: "the minimum necessary activities"...
"Sending our troops to an illegal war waged by the United States is unacceptable," Choi Young-ok, a member of Korean Peace Solidarity for Sovereignty and Reunification, a group that is highly critical of the US military presence in South Korea, told AFP .
"There is no reason for us to send troops when no other country has done so or said it would ," added Choi, who also warned that sending South Korean troops would "inevitably lead to casualties." Now, Seoul is nervously awaiting Trump's reaction and coming wrath.
* * *
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 11:20 Close
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:45:00 +0000 AfD Preps Talks With Moscow To Reopen Cheap Gas Flows To Germany
AfD Preps Talks With Moscow To Reopen Cheap Gas Flows To Germany
It didn't take long for the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party - fresh off its historic taking of 43.8% of the vote in the eastern German state of Saxony-Anhalt election earlier this month which left Chancellor Friedrich Merz and his Christian Democratic Union (CDU) shaken - to embark on ties which are a serious shot across the bow and slap in the face to both Berlin and Brussels .
Reuters is on Friday reporting that AfD leadership is preparing for possible talks with President Putin and his economic envoy and top negotiator Kirill Dmitriev focused on restoring Russian gas supplies to Germany .
via Reuters
The meeting could take place next year, as early as March 2027 , and would be spearheaded by AfD co-leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla.
This is precisely what German voters supported in the regional election, and the AfD made no secret of its plans to seek turning the Russian energy tap back on. Weidel made clear in a June interview , "Cheap energy from Russia was the secret of the success of 'Made in Germany'. We need it back ."
"The loss of this energy has set us back years. Hundreds of thousands of jobs have been lost," the AfD co-leader said at the time. "It has made us dependent on ?the United States, which sells us energy at far higher prices ."
Russia had prior to the start of the Ukraine war supplied over half of Germany's natural gas, alongside more than a third of the country's crude oil imports.
Russian natgas to Germany was halted in stages, in tandem with the major Nord Stream bombings and investigation, as Berlin eventually found alternative suppliers like Norway, the Netherlands and increased its reliance on LNG imports.
Many Germans have been sick and tired of seeing daily living prices go up while resources and untold billions are siphoned off for the Zelensky government in the Ukraine war.
Getty Images
While nothing has yet to be officially announced or confirmed by the Russian side or through any AfD official statement, Reuters points to a key caveat based on its sources: "The meeting would only happen if a peace framework was agreed first between Russia and Ukraine, ?and the organisers hoped it would bring together the AfD, Russia and the United States, the person said. Possible locations for the summit included ?Israel, the United Arab Emirates or India, they added," the report says.
Earlier, we featured commentary by Andrew Korybko which seeks to summarize the mood in both Moscow and among the 'hard-rightward' turning German streets :
Finally, the economic errors concern the EU's sanctions on Russian energy, which led to the bloc replacing inexpensive long-term gas contracts with Russia with expensive market-priced imports from elsewhere. Prices are now nearly ten times higher than before and "may well rise even further." Putin also criticized the EU's gas storage policies for being "unconcerned with the technical condition of these storage facilities and the physical volumes involved." All of this adversely affects the EU's economy.
All in all, Putin is arguing that the AfD's rise is an electoral revolt against these policies, all of which center on Russia. This doesn't mean that the party or its supporters are "pro-Russian", let alone "Russian puppets", just that they understand the importance of pragmatic ties with Russia for their country's political interests, security, and economic development. Obsessive anti-Russian fearmongering, risking World War III over Ukraine, and dumping inexpensive Russian energy haven't helped Germany at all.
" Bests interests for Germany" being prioritized, where energy supplies "are cheapest, namely from Russia"...
As a reminder, there were already some deeply provocative diplomatic AfD moves back in June, with AfD foreign-policy spokesman Markus Frohnmaier having traveled to St. Petersburg to meet with Dmitriev and Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller, urging the reopening of the Nord Stream pipeline .
* * *
Tyler Durden
Fri, 09/18/2026 - 10:45 Close