CMR is the leading provider of funding and management support for small to medium-sized businesses and entrepreneurs 

Authored by Jordan Schachtel via American Greatness,

Anthropic's upcoming IPO is going to make its founders very, very rich. And unfortunately for freedom-loving Americans, it will dramatically expand the liquid resources of the Effective Altruism (EA)-linked network surrounding the company, putting extraordinary amounts of cash behind people and groups that are trying to manipulate society into bending to its ideals.

At a reported potential valuation of $1.5-$2 trillion, Anthropic's seven cofounders will hold approximately $150-$200 billion in combined equity. They have already pledged 80 percent of their personal Anthropic equity to philanthropic causes. Of course, we know how that game works in politics. "Philanthropy" quickly becomes a weaponized political agenda. See: Soros, Steyer, etc.

Dario Amodei and his cofounders will soon acquire the capacity to reshape an entire policy ecosystem in Washington, D.C., and it would behoove lawmakers and policymakers to get ready for the unprecedented infusion of EA-aligned capital and resources soon entering the system.

The money

Anthropic released its S-1 IPO filing earlier this week, and it provides a much firmer basis for estimating founder wealth. The disclosed holdings are evenly distributed, with each founder owning approximately 1.4 percent on an estimated fully diluted basis.

Using the reported founder share counts and approximately 16.94 billion fully diluted shares implied by the filing, I created a table that produces the following likely scenarios:

Anthropic's founders are already wealthy on paper, and access to public markets will soon make their fortunes much easier to deploy.

Anthropic has long had a close association with the broader Effective Altruism movement in the Bay Area.

In an interview with the EA-associated organization 80,000 Hours, Anthropic cofounder Chris Olah recalled that Amodei was giving substantial amounts from his graduate-student stipend to GiveWell, another EA-aligned charity, as early as 2012-2013. That giving helped bring him into contact with Holden Karnofsky, who cofounded GiveWell and Open Philanthropy, another EA-aligned nonprofit entity.

Karnofsky is married to Daniela Amodei (Dario's sister), who also cofounded Anthropic. Open Philanthropy, since renamed Coefficient Giving (in part to wash their hands of the FTX-Sam Bankman-Fried scandal), is a major institution in the EA funding ecosystem. It has already been reported that Dario Amodei and Jack Clark have both signed the Giving What We Can pledge, an EA-aligned campaign that calls on people to commit at least 10 percent of income to "effective" charities.

Benjamin Mann, another Anthropic cofounder who was not listed on the S-1 for reasons unknown, published an essay in 2019 titled "Why I now identify as an Effective Altruist."

We aren't just guessing when it comes to Anthropic's plan to donate heavily to Democrats and push them to pursue Effective Altruist priorities.

In May, Dario Amodei personally donated $1 million to Public First, a super PAC supporting candidates who favor AI doomer talking points and heavy-handed regulatory capture of AI. Its affiliated network spent heavily supporting Democratic congressional candidate Alex Bores. Separately, Daniela Amodei's donations include large sums to the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

Anthropic itself has contributed $40 million to Public First Action, the advocacy arm of Public First.

There is a documented overlap between enormous Anthropic-related wealth, EA-linked institutions, Democratic donors, and a relentless campaign in D.C. to pursue regulatory capture on behalf of the top AI frontier companies.

The Anthropic cofounders are deploying their wealth, but not their control over the company.

The governance arrangement, according to Anthropic's IPO prospectus, shows that a single Class F share held by Founder LLC will carry 50.1 percent of voting power on matters submitted to shareholders generally. This shields them from any public investor attempts to steer the company in a new direction, should anyone acquire a substantial position. The Anthropic co-founders designed a system so that they can give away most of their economic stakes without a corresponding reduction in their voting power.

Sure, not every dollar pledged will fund superintelligence doomerism. Some could be healthcare, scientific research, and the like.

But the concentration of power in one vehicle supported by like-minded ideologues deserves some serious scrutiny. Anthropic's IPO will undoubtedly turn an already robust network into an even far wealthier and more influential one.

The people building some of the world's most powerful technologies may soon try to push ideas upon Washington lawmakers that are entirely detached from the interests of their constituents. Now, more than ever, politicians and policymakers need to be aware of the storm coming shortly after the midterms.

A Learjet 60 (N722BD), registered to LR60271 LLC, based in Wilmington, Delaware, crashed in a residential area of Palm Beach County, Florida, on Sunday afternoon while flying from Austin, Texas, to North Eleuthera Airport in the Bahamas.

Flightradar24 reports:

We're following reports of an aircraft crash near Palm Beach, Florida. Based on ADS-B data, it appears that the involved aircraft is N722BD, a Learjet 60. Last data from the aircraft was at altitude 8,750 ft. Max vertical speed was more than -32,000 fpm.

The Learjet departed Austin at 15:37 bound for the Bahamas, climbing to a cruising altitude of 41,000 feet. At 17:35 near Naples, FL, the aircraft began a descent down to 35,000 feet. At 17:48, the aircraft briefly climbed, before entering a steep, righthand descent.

The crash site is just four miles south of the West Palm Beach airport, which was renamed for President Donald Trump earlier this year. Trump had departed aboard Air Force One a little more than an hour before the crash.

CNN cites the Federal Aviation Administration, which said the private jet had nine people on board when it crashed.

Dramatic footage of the crash:

Footage of the aftermath:

*Developing

The hyperscaler and neocloud bubble has dominated the attention of traders and investors this fall as cracks emerge in the AI data center buildout craze. But a much smaller speculative bubble has emerged in Pokémon cards, echoing the Beanie Baby pump-and-dump craze of the late 1990s. 

"Facebook Marketplace is littered with people offloading under market. Sealed is going up 20-30% week over week of some generations. Card shows becoming much more frequent. Restocks happening consistently. Seems like market is just doing a crazy bull run, anyone worried about the drop off?" one Redditor recently wrote in the subreddit PokemonInvesting.

Pokémon card pricing and market analytics website CardTrack has created an index tracking the 100 most valuable cards, valued at $274,371 and up 161% since September 2021.

Much like the stock market's "Fear & Greed" indicator, CardTrack captures a snapshot of investor sentiment, which has entered "Extreme Greed" territory.

"The 100 most valuable Pokémon cards aren't a fund you can buy ... but if you could, here's how the same money would have done against Bitcoin, gold and the stock market Sep 2021 ? Nov 2026," the card-tracking website wrote on its site.

Here are the biggest movers in the index.

The index's top constituents.

InvestingLive analyst Justin Low commented on the Pokémon craze:

We are no longer just talking about people spending a few thousand dollars on nostalgia anymore. At these extravagant prices, collectibles are competing for the same pools of capital that could otherwise be sitting in stocks, crypto, watches, art or other alternative assets.

In the current landscape, there is somewhat of an investment infrastructure forming around the hobby. Grading companies provide the necessary authentication and condition benchmarks, major auction platforms are playing a role in terms of improving price discovery, while vaulting services and online marketplaces make it easier for expensive collectibles to change hands without owners physically carrying millions of dollars worth of cardboard around.

Low asks whether all this momentum in Pokémon card prices is a bubble.

I would say parts of it definitely does draw some parallels to one. Record prices attract attention, and the attention then attracts new buyers and new buyers push prices higher and higher. We've seen that script play out one too many a time in traditional markets before.

For context, baby boomers and young millennials remember the the Beanie Baby craze that inflated in the mid/late 1990s, peaked around 1998, and unraveled in 1999, just ahead of the Dot Com bust. That bubble turned $5 plush bears into perceived investments, while some consumers paid thousands of dollars for rare bears at the market's peak.

Is anyone surprised?

A federal judge on Sunday threw out the Justice Department's lawsuit seeking to stop Alaska from certifying its U.S. Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses. U.S. District Judge Sharon Gleason, an Obama nominee, ruled in a 20-page order that the government lacks standing, writing that it "failed to establish the redressability prerequisite for Article III standing," CBS News reported.

?? BREAKING: A Obama judge just TOSSED the DOJ's Alaska lawsuit over the FAKE Dan Sullivan, per AP

UNBELIEVABLE. They're even working on a SUNDAY to rig the election out here.

Judge Gleason dismissed the suit, which tried to BLOCK certification of a Sen. Dan Sullivan loss if... pic.twitter.com/xdjzzbVrBY

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) November 1, 2026

The department sued on Oct. 22, after Trump said he had ordered the case. It asked the court to bar Alaska from certifying any result "that may be impacted by voter confusion" and to make the state "preserve and segregate" ballots marked for Daniel J. Sullivan, a Petersburg retiree who shares the senator's name, Alaska Public Media reported. The idea was to investigate whether those voters meant to pick the incumbent.

Gleason was sharpest on the segregation request, which the department pressed in a Friday filing. She wrote that "the United States provides no workable plan as to how it proposes to segregate ballots" cast for the second Sullivan. The state's lawyers had argued that ballots carry no voter names and are mixed in the box, so no such inquiry is possible, and that it would violate ballot secrecy.

She added that the order would likely cause voter "confusion and consequent incentive to remain away from the polls." "Such late-breaking changes to the election rules are strongly disfavored," Gleason wrote, and the requests "certainly involve the time, place, and manner of Alaska's election," which the Constitution leaves to the states, per the AP.

The department had amended its complaint on Oct. 29, adding a Supremacy Clause claim built on the National Voter Registration Act. Democracy Docket reported that Gleason also denied leave to amend again, finding another rewrite futile. A Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to CBS, and Alaska Public Media said an appeal is likely.

The dismissal does not end the federal criminal investigation into how Daniel J. Sullivan got on the ballot. The department has issued grand jury subpoenas, and no one has been charged, according to the AP. The probe follows a New York Times report, covered here, that Democratic operatives recruited Alaskans named Dan Sullivan; Mary Peltola's campaign denies any role. Gov. Mike Dunleavy has ordered a state investigation, and the feds have surged agents into Alaska, as we noted Friday.

Sullivan, appearing on CNN's "State of the Union," said "I'm sure I'm going to lose a lot of votes to that trickery." Peltola said she is "not interested in tricking voters," per CBS.

The suit was the Trump administration's pre-emptive bid to shape a count that was still two days away. Trump had vowed "powerful legal options" against the other Sullivan, who got 2.5% in the primary, and Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the case on CBS. Alaska's answer to the confusion argument was that voters in the ranked-choice race can rank both Sullivans, and election officials added identifiers to the ballot to tell them apart. 

Voting ends Tuesday... 

As Jonathan Turley wrote earlier, amid the constant chatter about 'saving democracy', Democratic party leaders appear to embrace these voter confusion tactics as harmless ("it's part of the process") or even humorous ("I think it's funny.")

In his work "Politics and the English Language," George Orwell explains that "In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible." If so, the news this week took a truly Orwellian turn as Democrats rationalized or even praised the effort in Alaska to put a decoy "Dan Sullivan" on the ballot to confuse Alaskans and cause mistaken votes. Other Democratic politicians are entirely silent on the allegation that the campaign of Democratic candidate Mary Peltola engineered this grossly unethical tactic. The very same people running on "saving Democracy" are, once again, defending ballot manipulation designed to negate the votes of citizens.

It is the ultimate expression of rage politics, excusing any act needed to achieve power.

On NewsNation Now, Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA) went beyond many of his colleagues in saying that the Alaskan scandal shows precisely where all states, including Virginia, should go. When asked about the scandal, Subramanyam insisted that it showed how all states should embrace the widely criticized ranked-choice voting system. (Alaskans may finally reject the system this year). While asked about the use of a decoy candidate, Subramanyam bizarrely spun the question as third-party candidates - a bizarre claim since the fake Dan Sullivan has not campaigned, has never run for office, and is obviously on the ballot solely to confuse voters.

Nevertheless, Subramanyam insisted, while he would not run a decoy, "I also don't have a ranked-choice voting system in Virginia. I wish I did, honestly. But, in Alaska, they have ranked-choice voting, and third-party candidates are very relevant. And so, if you recruited a third-party candidate who can take votes away from your opponent, that's part of the process, and that's just how it works in Alaska." Previously, Subramanyam also supported the most radical gerrymandering effort in the nation (which was later struck down as unlawful).

Sen. Chris Murphy (D., Conn.) seemed to snowball as he tried to rationalize the move. He first attempted to blame it on one woman who was a "disgruntled former employee." When CNN host Kaitlan Collins noted that The New York Times was relying on a large number of sources in the Peltola campaign, Murphy said it wouldn't bother him at all to have decoys on his ballot because no one would be confused when voting. Of course, the entire reason you put another Dan Sullivan on the ballot is to confuse voters and cause citizens to throw away their votes on the wrong man. In a close election, that can easily make the difference in the outcome of the election. Murphy also praised the Peltola campaign and said he "trusts" them, despite the New York Times saying they actively sought to cause such voting errors.

In 2025, Murphy appeared on any cable show that would have him to declare that "those of us who believe that the threat to democracy is urgent" need to "act like it."

Most Democratic leaders refused to say anything at all in the face of an open effort to nullify votes through candidate confusion.

Pundits and party officials have dismissed the scandal as brass-knuckles politics or even as humorous. The head of Alaska's Democratic Party, Eric Croft, insisted that the sole consideration is whether it is a crime, not whether it is unethical: "I reread all of Alaska's statutes. I'm kind of a recovering attorney up here. And there is nothing, there's no legal issue to it. On your, you know, sort of dirty tricks thing, I think Alaskans have a different take there too."

When pressed whether it is a good thing to try to confuse Alaskan voters and nullify their votes, Croft responded "No, I think it's funny."

That knee-slapper involves a politician and campaign that allegedly lied to the public about their involvement. It involves a decoy who is also accused of lying when he said he had no interaction with third parties and did not enter the race to confuse voters. (Notably, the decoy, when asked by the Division of Elections how his name should appear on the ballot, reportedly asked to use "S" as a middle initial (like the senator) as opposed to his own initial of "J." ).

One would think that this would be an easy question for candidates who insist that they are defenders of democracy. However, in 2024, Democrats moved to remove Trump and other Republicans from ballots while claiming to be protecting voters by denying them the choice of candidates. The fact that the voters gave Trump the popular vote and swept every swing state only magnified the hypocrisy of these Democratic leaders. Yet, some of the same figures are back at it again with efforts to manipulate balloting to confuse or nullify votes in the name of protecting democracy.

Some of the same figures, such as Marc Elias, have reappeared in yet another election scandal. The Elias Law Group was named by the New York Times as involved in the controversy. Elias was a central figure in the Russian hoax as the campaign lawyer for Hillary Clinton. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) fined the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign for violating election rules in hiding the funding for the infamous Steele dossier. Before the election, Clinton officials denied any such involvement.

In an age of rage, consistency, like decency, is a stranger to politics. 

We are left again in that moment with lawyer Joseph Welch in the Army-McCarthy hearings in 1954: "Have you no shame, sir, at long last? Have you no shame?" The answer today is clear: No, but I have the votes.

Europe appears to have been thrown into an accelerated timeline of crises colliding at once, whether far-left social unrest in France, which has spread to several other countries, the unfolding debt crisis in France, or the political crisis in Poland that erupted in the last 24 hours. The momentum is troubling and concerning.

For the third Saturday in a row, Paris looked like a city under lockdown. More than 40 metro and RER stations were closed, and shopkeepers along the route boarded up their windows with plywood or kept their shutters down.

France's seats of power, including the Élysée Palace, the prime minister's office, and the National Assembly, were heavily guarded, even though the authorized march took place several miles to the east. Overnight curfews also restricted access to Place de la République and Les Halles, two areas ransacked on Oct. 17.

Some 70,000 police and gendarmes were deployed nationwide, and Nuñez said 40,000 checks had been carried out on roads and in train stations, 15,000 of them in the Paris region, to intercept weapons. Face coverings, Halloween masks included, were banned around the demonstrations.

France

Tens of thousands of left-wing demonstrators marched along the eastern edge of Paris on Saturday, in a third straight weekend of nationwide protests marked by a Molotov cocktail attack on a gendarme, clashes in several major cities, and a call by far-left student unions for new blockades of high schools and universities from Tuesday.

As Etienne Fauchaire reported for The Epoch Times, the Interior Ministry counted 320,000 demonstrators across France, including 70,000 in Paris, down from 410,000 the previous Saturday and roughly 550,000 on Oct. 17, when rioters looted hundreds of shops. Organizers claimed nearly 500,000 participants, including 200,000 in the capital.

By 9 p.m., 565 people had been arrested nationwide.

At an evening press conference, Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez said every march had contained groups of rioters and looters, "many of them driven by the ultra-left and the radical far left," who attacked police with the goal of reaching the city centers "with unheard-of violence."

He listed Paris, Montpellier, Toulouse, Rennes, Marseille, Nantes, Angers, and Tours as cities where groups of several hundred people had tried to break through police lines with mortar fireworks, paving stones, and other projectiles, and said firefighters had to put out numerous fires.

The most serious incident took place at the end of the Paris march near Porte de Charenton, where a Molotov cocktail landed on the shield of a mobile gendarmerie unit and set a gendarme alight before his colleagues put out the flames. He ended up being slightly injured, Nuñez said.

"When you throw a Molotov cocktail at a police line, I call that attempted murder," the minister said, stating that everything would be done to identify the perpetrators.

Similar left-wing rallies took place in some 30 German cities on Saturday.

Germany

Beyond the political crisis in Poland and the US warning earlier today of a potential "mass casualty" incident in Moscow, another crisis appears to be unfolding in Germany on Halloween night: looting and chaos.

An initiative called "Gen Z regelt" ("Gen Z's got this") organized these protests "for education, health, climate protection and an affordable life" and opposing the return of military conscription.

Some protests in Germany also turned violent on Saturday night.

"The looting of stores has started in Frankfurt, Germany. Young first and second-generation migrants are attacking stores in the city," Poland-based digital news outlet Visegrád 24 wrote on X.

A lot more footage of the looting has surfaced on X in the last few hours:

"German police were attacked with a Molotov cocktail in the city of Frankfurt on Halloween night. Youths participated in looting and clashes with police, with much of the footage livestreamed on TikTok," Budapest-based news outlet Remix News & Views wrote on X.

Rest of Europe

In Portugal, thousands of demonstrators gathered in Lisbon once again to protest the housing crisis. The movement has faced criticism from the Portuguese right, which accuses left-wing and far-left groups of driving the protests.

In The Hague, Netherlands, protests broke out after calls to demonstrate circulated online. According to Dutch police, 34 people were arrested, and one officer was taken to hospital with suspected hearing damage after fireworks were thrown at police. As in Paris, many shops across the city had boarded up their windows amid fears of rioting.

On Oct. 30, large crowds took to the streets across Italy following a call to demonstrate by the Italian trade union USB. The union estimated that more than 1 million people participated in protests across 70 cities, while the Interior Ministry put the figure at 255,000. Violent clashes between demonstrators and police broke out in Rome, Turin, Mestre, Vicenza, and other cities, according to Corriere della Sera.

Europe's mounting crises point to a troubling deterioration in stability. 

***

About one week ago, we wrote about China's version of the Plunge Protection Team going into overdrive as Beijing moved to stabilize equities amid an imploding AI trade. Bank of America's Michael Hartnett, BNP Paribas, and Goldman Sachs all pointed to signs of renewed state-backed market support.

Fast forward to Sunday: Bloomberg cites local news outlets saying China's central bank, securities regulators, and some securities firms and funds will meet Monday to review ways to boost a relending program that finances share buybacks and stake increases.

The combination of China's PPT and Beijing's search for creative tools to boost stock prices follows the CSI 300 Index's October plunge into a bear market, which fell 8.5% and dropped for a record 12 straight weeks. Last month's decline was the steepest since early 2016.

Beijing's pain point has certaintly emerged. Hartnett's latest Flow Show, "Enter the Dragon" edition, pointed out that a $17 billion inflow into Chinese equities had just occurred, while China's state-owned investment funds intervened in the stock market, according to Nikkei Asia.

Goldman's Asia desk recently noted that "state-backed 'national team' ETF buying supported the recovery, with turnover across nine favored ETFs reaching RMB84bn ($12.6bn), after the market entered bear-market territory on Thursday."

BNP Paribas' Asia Pacific equity derivatives strategist Scarlett Liu was quoted by Nikkei as saying that elevated ETF inflows point to a "reacceleration in dip-buying by the national team."

Beijing's move to rescue the CSI 300 from a bear market comes as China's official manufacturing and non-manufacturing purchasing managers' indexes slumped back into a contraction in October.  

As we noted, "What makes this PPT round especially different is what Beijing is propping up. The AI Trade."

This past Thursday, our technicians at The Market Ear gave readers a broader understanding of why China's PPT is coming to the rescue, first asking: "Is this capitulation, or just another leg lower?"

Update (1335ET): Democrats are having a meltdown after Rep. Haley Stevens flipped and endorsed Republican Mike Rogers for a coveted Michigan Senate seat - appearing with him on Sunday at a black church in Detroit ahead of midterms, just two days away. 

According to RawStory, Haley's congressional staff began resigning 'almost immediately,' and "observers online suggested she "sold her soul" for power."

Stevens appeared with Rogers, a former GOP congressman endorsed by President Donald Trump, at a Sunday morning service at Perfecting Church in Detroit, according to Bridge Michigan. Shortly afterward, Detroit News Washington correspondent Melissa Nann Burke reported that “Haley Steven’s official staff including her longtime chief are resigning from her office this morning, per spox.”

HuffPost senior politics reporter Igor Bobic posted an automatic email reply from Stevens’ communications director: “Hello, as of November 1st I am no longer with the Office of Congresswoman Haley Stevens.” -RawStory

Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called it a "despicable beytrayal from Rep. Stevens."

Except, Schumer's hands aren't exactly clean this election cycle (are they ever?)...

***

After losing her party's Senate primary to Abdul El-Sayed in August, Rep. Haley Stevens has officially endorsed his Republican opponent Mike Rogers, attending Sunday church services with him in Detroit. 

The two were seen separately entering Perfecting Church, a prominent Black church in the city - an extremely unusual move for a sitting Democrat in the closing days of a race her party is fighting to hold. Election Day is Tuesday.

Stevens and El-Sayed had been scheduled to campaign together Sunday at a get-out-the-vote event at another Detroit church with Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), which would have been their first joint public appearance in months, according to MS NOW. Stevens endorsed El-Sayed days after the primary, and they appeared together at a unity breakfast that month, but have not campaigned together since.

The plan went south after Stevens issued a statement calling on El-Sayed to condemn an anti-Israel ad from Rebellion PAC, an outside group not affiliated with his campaign, posted by Cenk Uygur - which blames high grocery prices on U.S. aid to Israel. 

In response: 

Stevens wrote that the ad "did not invent its argument" and reflected El-Sayed's own rhetoric, and that he could begin his effort to remove money from politics "by getting Israel out of his explanation for everything Michigan cannot afford," MS NOW reported.

On the eve of the eve of the eve of our BIG and important election, a unifying moment has arrived, our democratic nominee for U.S Senate disavows the Rebellion PAC ad made by Hasan Piker's uncle that claims Jews are responsible for America's economic woes. We have learned from... pic.twitter.com/y8BRiV9odX

— Haley Stevens (@HaleyforMI) October 30, 2026

El-Sayed responded, writing that Stevens "seems intent on relitigating a primary that ended three months ago." His campaign then asked Stevens to stay away from its events for the rest of the race, a Democratic source told MS NOW on condition of anonymity.

pic.twitter.com/NEd1uijz11

— Dr. Abdul El-Sayed (@AbdulElSayed) October 30, 2026

After a Saturday rally in Sterling Heights, El-Sayed told MS NOW, "You guys love to play the 'condemn' game," adding that the ad "was not made by me, and I do not agree with the contents of that ad." Stevens answered in a statement that did not name him: "I was glad to see our senate nominee say he does not agree with the content of the vile Rebellion PAC ad which claimed Israel and Jews were to blame for the high costs of groceries."

According to Newsweek, the ad repackages a spot from Uygur's failed 2024 presidential run. In response, El-Sayed campaign spokesperson Roxie Richner said it is "not affiliated in any way with the Abdul for Senate campaign" and that "no one speaks for Abdul but himself and his campaign." DNC chair Jaime Harrison said the ad "doesn't help him," and Uygur wrote on X that anyone who thinks it is antisemitic is "in a cult."

This is a close, key race. According to a WDIV/Detroit News poll by the Glengariff Group, taken Oct. 19 to 22 among 600 likely voters, El-Sayed is sitting at at 51.4%, with a margin of error of 4 points. The Democrat's campaign has been under pressure on other fronts, as we reported when undercover video and when AIPAC pulled back.