CMR is the leading provider
of funding and management
support for small to
medium-sized businesses and
entrepreneurs
Established 1984 C MR
is the leading venture
capital, management
support and business
services provider for
small to medium-sized
businesses - linking
excellent management
skills with the
substantial financial
resources of a global bank
of private investors.
CMR has over 450 senior
executives, operating
in the UK, USA, Europe, Asia,
Australasia and
globally,
providing both funding and
specialist help for
entrepreneurial
businesses .
For Businesses
CMR provides excellent
resources:
CMR FundEX Business Exchange - gives all companies & entrepreneurs direct access to CMR's global investor base.
CMR Catalyst Group
Programme -
transform
profitability through
merging.
CMR Company Sales Division helps owners to exit
at the best price.
CMR Corporate Recovery
Division -
experts in rescue and
turnaround.
CMR Technology Licensing
Division -
commercialising
innovation.
CMR Executive
Professionals - management support
and consultancy.
CMR Executives-on-Demandâ„¢ Fully experienced
senior executives
available quickly and
cost effectively.
We always welcome
contact with new
business clients- please get in touch
- we will do our
best to match
your needs and exceed
your expectations.
For Investors
Preferential access to new opportunities for investment and/or acquisition
P re-vets
propositions and
provides a
personalised service
to our investors
Syndication service
enabling investors to
link together as desired
Executive and
management support for
investments as needed
CMR's services to
our investors are not
only fast & efficient
but also free
W e
always appreciate new
members- you are welcome
to join as an investor
or as a CMR Executive.
When you
join us as a Senior
Executive:
CMR's strength is in the
skills and experience of
our executive members -
all senior, director level
people with years of
successfully running and
managing companies.
Because the demand for
CMR's support and services
is ever-increasing,
especially as we enter
recessionary times, we
have a growing need for
more high calibre
executives to join us from
every industry and
discipline.
You will be using your
considerable experience to
help smaller businesses
and entrepreneurs to grow
profitably.
We offer full training
and mentoring support to
help maximise potential.
We are
always keen to find more
high calibre senior
executives in all areas-
skills and location.
Make contact with us today
and maximise your
opportunities.
HEAD
OFFICE
124 City Road
London EC1 2NX
Tel: +44 (0)207-636-1744
Fax:+44 (0)207-636-5639
Email: cmr@cmruk.com
Registered Office:
124 City Road ,
London EC1 2NX
Also Glasgow,
Dublin, Switzerland, Europe, USA/Canada
Privacy Statement: CMR only
retains personal details
supplied directly by executives
joining CMR themselves either as
Full Executive Members or
Interim Management Members or
Investors. Those details are
only used within CMR and not
disclosed to any third parties
without that person’s
agreement. We will keep that
data until requested by the
person to be removed – at that
point it will be deleted.
Personal data is never sold or
used for purposes outside of
CMR’s normal operations. Any
correspondence should be
directed to the Managing
Director, CMR,
Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London EC1V
2N
Senior Executives
CMR is a worldwide network of senior executives. Join us to expand your career and business horizons.
Business Entrepreneurs
CMR has a complete range of resources & services provided by experts to help all businesses to grow and prosper.
Investors & Venturers
CMR has a continuous stream of business and funding propositions, which are matched to investor preferences. Join us - it's FREE!
FundEX
FundEX is CMR's worldwide stock market for small to medium sized companies and entrepreneurs to raise new capital.
Interim & Permanent Management
Many of CMR's executives can be recruited on an interim, permanent or NED basis.
Login
Main CMR Intranet members only
Regional Intranets
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 10:30:00 +0000 Boat Migrants Who Have Entered Britain Now Outnumber Its Soldiers
Boat Migrants Who Have Entered Britain Now Outnumber Its Soldiers
Boat Migrants Who Have Entered Britain Now Outnumber Its Soldiers
Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News ,
Britain now has more illegal Channel arrivals under the Labour government, which has been in power two years, than it has soldiers in the British Army.
Home Office figures put small-boat arrivals since Labour took office on 4 July 2024 at 83,279. The regular Army stands at 83,000.
On Wednesday alone, 781 people came ashore - the worst single day since Andy Burnham replaced Sir Keir Starmer as prime minister in July. The first three days of the week delivered 1,085 arrivals. Across 809 days of Labour government, that works out at roughly 103 people a day.
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the milestone speaks for itself. "Labour has let an entire army-sized population cross the Channel illegally," he said. "More people have arrived in small boats than we have soldiers defending Britain. That is completely bonkers. Labour has lost control of our borders and seems utterly incapable of getting it back. "
Former Royal Navy officer Chris Parry went further. Labour's intake, he said, amounts to six-and-a-half divisions of fighting-age men. "That's more divisions than were in the Allied assault wave on D-Day," he added, calling the crossings "amphibious operations against our coast."
The comparison is worse when the rest of the services are brought in. Labour's small-boat total already sits 15,429 ahead of the Royal Navy and RAF combined, which together field 67,850 full-time personnel. And this is only the post-election slice. Under the Conservatives, around 128,000 people arrived by dinghy. Since records began in December 2018 the running total has blown past 200,000 - higher than the combined strength of the Army, Navy and RAF.
Writing in the Mail after more than 1,200 people crossed from Monday, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said: "It is utterly insane. And if it wasn't clear before, the events of the past few days have proved beyond any reasonable doubt that both Border Force and the Home Office have completely lost control."
He added: "Years ago, I warned the small boats crisis would define this era of British politics. Predictably, the chin-stroking commentariat declared I was exaggerating. Well, look where we are now."
"Ordinary Britons rightly ask if successive governments cannot stop people from arriving illegally in broad daylight, let alone under cover of darkness without detection, then what exactly is the point of having a border?" Farage asked. His party wants the largest military operation in the Channel since the Second World War and a return of every illegal arrival to France.
Two boats this week reached British beaches without Border Force interception - one at Samphire Hoe between Dover and Folkestone, another near Folkestone the day before. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood ordered an "urgent review" and said even one uncontrolled landing is "one too many." Education Secretary Lucy Powell then told GB News that "you can't stop everything all of the time," while insisting Mahmood was taking "swift action to find out what's gone wrong here and make sure it doesn't happen again."
Border Force union official Lucy Moreton was less diplomatic. Undetected landings are "absolutely, definitely happening, " she said, with abandoned vessels and reports "all the way down to Falmouth." "If we don't look for it, we don't know it's happening. We don't know it's happening, we don't have to deal with it."
Labour's first act in 2024 was to scrap the Rwanda deterrent. Shadow energy secretary Andrew Bowie said the latest numbers follow from that choice. "We've got a government that is oblivious to the scale of the problem we face in the Channel, " he said. "It's not a surprise, frankly, because the very first thing this Labour government did was get rid of any sort of deterrent to prevent illegal migrants coming into this country."
Former Home Office borders director Glyn Williams told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that "the consequences of a failing policy... are becoming more and more extreme," and that "more extreme measures" may now have to be considered.
The official line is that crossings are down 42 percent this year and that summer 2026 was the quietest since 2020. That is the defence ministers reach for while dinghies still beach in Kent and Britain discusses paying France another billion pounds for the next small-boats deal. GB News presenter Patrick Christys called the week "full-on illegal migrant carnage."
The people coming off those boats do not vanish. They are processed, housed and parked on the public. We have already covered what that looks like on the ground. In Piddington, Oxfordshire - 350 residents, 46 children, no shop, no pub - a Home Office paper for the old MoD depot discussed 3,510 "service users" against an official planning figure of 1,256 single adult males. Ten migrants for every local.
Similar dumps are lined up at Linton-on-Ouse, Barnham and Crowborough as hotels are emptied into former barracks.
The legal machine that then keeps them here is not a refugee system. It is a production line. A Home Office official who has handled thousands of cases put the genuine share at "at best 1 per cent." Package stories, recycled police letters, staged nightclub photos, modern-slavery claims that cannot be disproved. Grant rates still run in the tens of thousands. Removals do not.
Who helps keep the Channel route open is another story again. NGO networks on the French coast have spent years treating the crossing as a humanitarian project rather than a breach of an island nation's border.
VIDEO
Migration Watch chairman Alp Mehmet urged "Military-age men are pouring into Britain across the Channel. Illegal Channel crossings are now a major political crisis, and pose a real and present threat to our national security."
Almost 90 percent of those intercepted since 2018 have been male; two-thirds are aged 18 to 39. People-smuggling gangs have told reporters that Iran has used the route to move operatives in return for a "favour" once on British soil. In 2023, nineteen suspected terrorists linked to Islamic State and al-Shabaab were reported to have arrived the same way.
A country that cannot stop a dinghy in daylight does not have a border policy. It has a ferry service run by criminal gangs, underwritten by hotels, lawyers and a claims system that treats refusal as the hard option.
Labour inherited a failure and then dismantled the one deterrent it had. Burnham now inherits the same beaches, the same numbers, and an actual Army smaller than the cohort that has already washed up on his party's watch.
Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/28/2026 - 06:30 Close
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:45:00 +0000 US Teen Mental Health Is Finally Improving After COVID Crisis
US Teen Mental Health Is Finally Improving After COVID Crisis
US Teen Mental Health Is Finally Improving After COVID Crisis
Teenage mental health in the United States continues to show signs of improvement after having fallen to multi-decade lows during the Covid-19 pandemic.
According to new CDC data published this week, teenagers surveyed at high schools across the United States last year showed notable improvements in several key measures, including persistent and debilitating feelings of sadness and hopelessness as well as serious suicide thoughts.
You will find more infographics at Statista
As Statista's Felix Richter reports, it’s the second consecutive time that the biennial survey has shown improvements to teens’ mental health after the 2021 edition had painted a grim picture of a generation in crisis, widely attributed to the Covid-19 pandemic policy responses.
Back then, 42.3 percent of students had reported feeling sad or hopeless almost every day for at least two weeks at some point in the year leading up to the survey. That share has fallen 33.3 percent in the latest survey. Even more dramatically, though, 22.2 percent of students had admitted to having seriously considered suicide in the past 12 months in 2021 – an alarming rate, which has fallen to 14.5 percent in 2025.
The CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Survey has been conducted every two years since 1991.
As the chart shows, rates of mental health issues had gradually increased since 2009 before peaking in 2021 .
And while the latest trend is positive, there are still causes for concern in the CDC’s latest data.
Not only does the survey reveal that girls are struggling mentally at a much higher rate than boys , but it also highlights that mental health outcomes are dramatically worse for teenagers who do not identify as heterosexual.
59 percent of those who identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual reported feelings of sadness and hopelessness, compared with 28 percent of heterosexual teens. Moreover, 32 percent of gay, lesbian or bisexual students said they had seriously considered suicide, versus just 11 percent of heterosexual students.
The latter findings are particularly alarming at a time when the current administration has normalized anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, which could further ostracize and marginalize a group of young Americans that is already evidently struggling.
Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/28/2026 - 05:45 Close
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:00:00 +0000 Netherlands Pushes To Scrap EU Gas Storage Mandate After $1.14 Billion Bill
Netherlands Pushes To Scrap EU Gas Storage Mandate After $1.14 Billion Bill
Netherlands Pushes To Scrap EU Gas Storage Mandate After $1.14 Billion Bill
Authored by Tsvetana Paraskova via OilPrice.com ,
The Netherlands considers that the current EU system of gas storage targets ahead of winter is inadequate and burdens governments that have to pay for meeting the EU-wide obligations.
The Dutch government has already spent almost $1.14 billion (1 billion euros) this summer season alone on building up inventories, while this task should fall mostly on the gas market participants, Climate Minister Stientje van Veldhoven said in a letter to Parliament cited by Bloomberg .
The Netherlands is a relatively small EU gas consumer, but it is a major natural gas hub and home to the EU's benchmark gas trading futures market, the Dutch Title Transfer Facility (TTF).
The current EU rules on mandatory gas storage levels consider storage capacity rather than consumption, the Netherlands argues.
Moreover, this spring-summer filling season has been particularly difficult and very expensive for the EU member states as natural gas prices soared in the wake of the Iran war and the very few LNG cargoes that make it through the Strait of Hormuz.
The price spike and the concern about near-term supply have deepened the backwardation structure of European gas prices, discouraging holding supply for later deliveries. Backwardation is the market structure in which prompt contracts trade higher than those further out in time, signaling concerns about immediate supply.
Weeks ago, the Dutch gas network operator said the Netherlands would miss its target to fill natural gas storage sites ahead of the winter, in one of the first evidence-based signs that Europe may be struggling to have sufficient supply for a harsh winter.
Germany, the EU's biggest economy, is considering expanding a key market incentive to encourage traders to raise gas storage levels ahead of the winter. The government is looking to use the existing market tool, the autumn tender for Long Term Options, or LTOs, on a larger scale.
Germany has the world's fourth-largest natural gas storage capacity, but this capacity was only 57% full as of September 24 , according to data by Gas Infrastructure Europe. That's a historically low level, and Germany risks gas shortages this winter if it turns out to be colder than previous years, the country's gas storage association, INES, warned earlier this month.
Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/28/2026 - 05:00 Close
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:15:00 +0000 Silver Is Backed Up For Months. Here's Why
Silver Is Backed Up For Months. Here's Why
Silver Is Backed Up For Months. Here's Why
Authored by VBL via GoldFix ,
Silver sold off during Josh Phair's September 23 interview, but the Scottsdale Mint CEO said the physical market's immediate constraint was at the refinery.
"Silver is backed up at the refineries... in many cases about 3-4 months," depending on the material, while finished refined metal remained amply available in the United States.
In his Mining.com Top of Mine interview, Phair said banks have been redirecting mined material toward refineries in countries friendly to the United States.
Those plants have been backed up for roughly a year. He was describing a delay in processing incoming material, alongside available stocks of finished metal.
VIDEO
Why silver moves between markets
Phair traced last year's large inflow of silver into the United States to tariff concerns. The inflow left the U.S. relatively well supplied compared with some overseas markets.
"Metal will go where it's treated best."
Banks and trading houses could then ship metal to a market offering a higher exchange-for-physical premium.
Even an extra 10 or 20 cents an ounce can justify the move when the trade is large enough.
He said that movement has continued, though it appears to have slowed as the U.S. market has become more balanced.
He did not give a current destination or tonnage for silver leaving the country.
Are governments buying silver?
Asked directly for evidence that governments are buying physical silver for reserves, Phair pointed to the former U.S. strategic silver stockpile, the government's designation of silver as a critical mineral, U.S. reliance on imports, and a stockpile program he called Project Vault.
He also argued that governments can work through banks to obtain materials without announcing every transaction.
Phair believes official silver buying may be occurring. He did not identify a current government silver purchase or give a reserve figure in the interview.
His stockpiling argument is an inference from policy and past practice.
The next constraint
Refining is the bottleneck Phair sees now.
Over a longer horizon, he expects mine supply to become harder to expand.
He cited years of limited investment in exploration and development, long permitting timelines, and the risks.
Gold math
Finally, Phair explains the 'gold math': take US foreign debt against stated gold holdings, solve for the gold price that balances them, and you get the 'Fair Sinclair' number.
"The Fair Sinclair ratio… is 35,000 on gold. So external debt, the status of gold holdings, and 35,000 is the balancing factor."
Phair treats it as a crisis-era valuation - not a next-month price target - adding that if he’s only partly right, holders still come out fine.
Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/28/2026 - 04:15 Close
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 07:30:00 +0000 A World Turned Upside Down
A World Turned Upside Down
A World Turned Upside Down
Authored by Alastair Crooke (former British diplomat, founder and director of the Beirut-based Conflicts Forum) via LewRockwell.com ,
Outline of a talk given at the Higher School of Economics, Moscow, 7 Sept 2026
Can civilizations pull together the fragments of older insights and knowing to give the context by which to make moral discourse intelligible again?
The global future is often framed as being that of a multi-polar or multi-nodal world, with the implicit assumption that states would get along better - and would resolve their differences more easily through discussion than through war.
This was a meme that was in wide circulation in the Pre-WW1 years. Books were written to suggest that war could not happen: The definitive text on this concept, originally published in 1910 as The Great Illusion , became an international bestseller.
Its author, Norman Angell, argued that because nations relied heavily on a highly intertwined global trading system, the economic cost of war would drastically outweigh any potential gains. He asserted that a victorious nation would suffer just as much economic ruin as the vanquished - making the traditional concept of military conquest obsolete. His argument was popularly interpreted as making war "impossible".
His argument proved fallacious; the Great War duly erupted.
Today, the idea of some multi-polarity interplay persists, but the threat of war remains and is heightened by the West's refusal to hear - or understand - what civilisational sovereign states are saying. This inability to listen with empathetic engagement lies at the root of the catastrophic western Intelligence misreadings of Iran and Russia. And the casting of China as so 'other' to make it a closed-book to western ears.
In his influential 1981 book, After Virtue , Alasdair MacIntyre argued that the Enlightenment project cut Western man off from his roots in tradition, but had failed to produce a binding morality based on Reason alone. Consequently, many of those who live in the West live a world of "moral chaos and fragmentation, in which 'chaotic', disintegrative forces have very nearly obliterated true moral inquiry from European culture".
What is important to understand is that MacIntyre's "moral chaos and fragmentation" is deliberately fostered to weaken national, community and religious attachment - precisely in order to target and weaken national cohesion and civilisational sovereignty.
MacIntyre's argument is that it is cultural tradition alone, and its moral tales, that provide context to terms such as good, justice and telos :
"In the absence of traditions, moral debate is out of joint and becomes a theatre of illusions in which simple indignation and mere protest occupy centre stage".
"Lines are drawn early, and participants rush to take sides. But in taking sides they appear to render themselves incapable of hearing the other ... Everyone feels the heat, but no one sees the light", MacIntyre underlines.
What we possess today, MacIntyre suggests, are nothing more than mere fragments of an older tradition (Heroic Society). These fragments simply are too sparse, since our moral discourse, which uses terms like good and justice and duty, has been robbed of the context that would make it intelligible. In other words, it places the virtue of the heroic, Homeric world beyond western reach.
Lines are drawn. There is a rush to take sides. The 'chaotic', disintegrative forces of today have very nearly obliterated moral inquiry from European culture. The more striking feature of moral debates is their tendency never to reach resolution.
When all moral judgments - stripped of context - become little more than expressions of preference, of attitude or feeling - emotivism, in other words - debate is out of joint; it is transformed into a theatre of narratives in which indignation and polarity take centre stage.
But, in taking such emotive partisan sides, actors render themselves incapable of hearing The Other . 'Others', then, whether Russia, Iran or China, simply become invisible by the norms of this approach - as their ways of orienting human attention to the world are quite distinct.
Thus, we can (and are) being led to war by narrative messaging specifically intended to compel humans to spatialise the world in a certain way, without our being aware of it. We are being led to an Enlightenment-driven 'one world' in which all 'Otherness' - whether Russian, Iranian or Chinese - becomes invisible by the norms, the mode of presence, by which we approach 'things '.
In this 'war', the world is turned 'upside down'. Most people are not actively spatialising the world around them, but seemingly have become content to have it spatialised for them . Narratives are kneaded and rolled out before our eyes. This is how the machine works. Most people in the West believe themselves to have a firm handle on reality - facts, evidence, and conclusions. But effectively, we face a structure that purposefully turns that imagined grasp on reality inside out .
In the machine, the 'spatialisation' is backwards: First, they receive the messaging, then they knead and roll out a narrative of 'reality' like dough, until it fits the design. And if required, they put the Media machine into reverse and knead that same reality in the opposite direction.
So how can sovereign civilisations escape the 'MacIntyre trap'? Can civilisations pull together the fragments of older insights and knowing to give the context by which to make moral discourse intelligible again?
To climb out of the Fustian space of mechanistic thinking and manipulated narrative is not easy or simple. Quite the contrary.
But notice what it requires - a change in our mode of presence; how we dispose our attention toward the world.
How you dispose of consciousness towards the world, neurologist Iain McGilchrist tells us, is crucial: For, the way that you do it, alters and determines what you will find and understand . And as we spatialise the world around us differently, perception widens and the (until then hidden) spaciousness of what lies beyond comes into view.
A recovery of older ways of thinking - the 'all-at-once, all together' way of thinking (thinking through image) and other sources of cognition - can open a path to mediation between the seemingly oppositional polarities of the subjective and the objective which mechanical rationality so often leaves hardened into unresolvable impedimenta. The apophatic approach too can blunt the sharp edges of conceptual thought by introducing 'betweenness' finding its space between sharp angular argument. These modes of thought possess logic of their own that stands apart from the Enlightenment rigidities.
This is the lesson that Iran and its re-discovery of ancient thought is providing to the world today.
Albert Einstein once noted that "the rational mind is a servant; but the intuitive mind is a precious gift. Our world, however, honours the servant - but forgets [ignores] the gift".
We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of ZeroHedge.
Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/28/2026 - 03:30 Close
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:45:00 +0000 These Are The Countries Importing The Most Military Drones
These Are The Countries Importing The Most Military Drones
Two countries at war with each other account for more than nine in ten of the military drones that crossed borders over the past four years.
<
Read more.....
These Are The Countries Importing The Most Military Drones
Two countries at war with each other account for more than nine in ten of the military drones that crossed borders over the past four years.
Ukraine took delivery of 8,664 foreign-supplied military drones from 2022 through 2025, most of them American, while Russia received 6,720, mostly Iranian Shahed-136s, according to SIPRI data compiled by Visual Capitalist. Taiwan, a distant third, received 291.
SIPRI's count leaves out most of what is actually flying. It tracks only large drones and long-range one-way attack models, so the cheap first-person-view drones fighting much of the war at the front don't register, and neither do drones a country builds at home.
As Visual Capitalist explains further,
Drones have become one of the defining weapons of modern warfare, and international trade in them now revolves around a single conflict.
This graphic ranks countries by the number of military drones they received from foreign suppliers from 2022 to 2025 , using data from the SIPRI Arms Transfers Database . The figures include drones sent as aid and those built in the recipient country under a foreign license.
SIPRI tracks major weapons only: drone aircraft with a loaded weight of at least 150 kg , plus one-way attack drones and loitering munitions, which it classifies as missiles. Small first-person-view (FPV) and commercial drones fall largely outside its scope.
Ukraine and Russia Dominate Military Drone Imports
The ranking drops off sharply after the top two countries. No other country received even 300 military drones during the period.
Ukraine's supply was heavily concentrated among U.S. systems, which accounted for 83% of its recorded total. Russia's recorded imports, meanwhile, were attributed to Iran.
The table below shows the number of military drones each country received in 2022-2025 and its share of the global total.
Rank
Country
Military Drone Imports (2022-2025)
Share of Global Total
1
???? Ukraine
8,664
51.5%
2
???? Russia
6,720
39.9%
3
???? Taiwan
291
1.7%
4
???? South Korea
190
1.1%
5
???? Azerbaijan
154
0.9%
6
???? India
119
0.7%
7
???? Georgia
100
0.6%
8
???? Albania
56
0.3%
9
???? Hungary
50
0.3%
9
???? Lithuania
50
0.3%
11
???? Pakistan
33
0.2%
12
???? DR Congo
29
0.2%
13
???? Poland
26
0.2%
14
???? UAE
22
0.1%
15
???? Belarus
20
0.1%
16
???? Kuwait
18
0.1%
16
???? Romania
18
0.1%
16
???? UK
18
0.1%
19
???? Sudan
17
0.1%
20
???? Mali
15
0.1%
21
???? Burkina Faso
10
0.1%
21
???? Morocco
10
0.1%
21
???? Serbia
10
0.1%
24
???? Bangladesh
9
0.1%
25
???? Kyrgyzstan
8
<0.1%
26
???? Niger
7
<0.1%
26
???? Nigeria
7
<0.1%
26
???? Thailand
7
<0.1%
29
???? Algeria
6
<0.1%
29
???? Croatia
6
<0.1%
29
???? Kenya
6
<0.1%
29
???? Switzerland
6
<0.1%
29
???? Tajikistan
6
<0.1%
34
???? Kosovo
5
<0.1%
34
???? Saudi Arabia
5
<0.1%
--
Other
104
0.6%
--
Global Total
16,822
100.0%
Most of Russia's drone imports were Shahed-136s, which Russia first imported from Iran and now produces in its own versions as the Geran-2. SIPRI says there is little indication that continued Iranian input is still needed.
Small Military Drone Trade Is Far Bigger
Outside Russia and Ukraine, Taiwan is the largest importer of military drones, with 291 U.S.-made loitering munitions delivered in 2025.
Its drone push has been influenced by Ukraine , and government plans call for up to 200,000 drones over the coming decade , more than 10 times the entire global total recorded from 2022 to 2025.
This gap exists because SIPRI's database, the same one behind our ranking of the biggest arms importers , tracks major weapons: large drones plus long-range one-way attack drones, with the latter making up 97% of the transfers shown here. The small, inexpensive first-person-view (FPV) drones that now do much of the fighting at the front mostly fall outside its scope.
Those drones move in far larger numbers. The UK alone delivered more than 85,000 smaller military drones to Ukraine in six months of 2025 , about five times SIPRI's recorded global total for the entire four-year period.
Drones built domestically are also excluded, since SIPRI only counts weapons that cross borders or are produced under a foreign license. Ukraine's defense industry can now produce more than 8 million FPV drones a year , while Ukrainian intelligence estimates that Russia builds about 2,800 Geran-2 drones per month , far above the 2,000 a year SIPRI records under the Iranian license.
Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/28/2026 - 02:45 Close
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 06:00:00 +0000 Italian Energy Giant Eni Caps Fuel Prices As Refining Crunch Drives Costs Higher
Italian Energy Giant Eni Caps Fuel Prices As Refining Crunch Drives Costs Higher
Italian Energy Giant Eni Caps Fuel Prices As Refining Crunch Drives Costs Higher
Authored by Charles Kennedy via OilPrice.com ,
Italian energy major Eni will cap fuel prices at its Enilive service stations beginning September 28 as tighter refined-product supplies and reduced European refining capacity continue to put upward pressure on pump prices.
The company said diesel sold through Enilive will be capped at €2.19 per liter, while petrol will be limited to €1.99 per liter. Eni said the caps are roughly €0.17 per liter below current average price levels.
The measure will initially remain in place for 30 days and could be extended through the end of 2026 depending on fuel-market conditions and supply trends.
Eni said the initiative is linked to excise-tax relief currently in force in Italy and is intended to reduce the impact of elevated fuel prices on households and businesses.
European fuel markets have faced renewed pressure from geopolitical disruptions, constrained refined-product availability and a long-term decline in regional refining capacity. Eni said nearly 30 European refineries have closed over the past 15 years , leaving the market more exposed when supplies tighten or imports are disrupted.
The Italian major said it has already been absorbing part of the increase in international fuel prices since March rather than fully passing higher wholesale costs through to recommended pump prices.
The latest intervention comes as European countries continue to grapple with the consequences of shrinking conventional refining capacity while attempting to transition toward lower-carbon fuels.
Eni is maintaining refining-related investments in Italy through its Enilive business, including its biorefineries in Venice and Gela. The company is also transforming its Livorno industrial site and other domestic facilities as part of a strategy focused increasingly on biofuels and lower-carbon products.
Those projects allow Eni to retain domestic processing capacity while shifting part of its downstream portfolio away from traditional petroleum refining.
[ZH: Last week saw US diesel prices decouple (lower) from EU prices amid chatter of a US export ban...]
The price cap also illustrates the increasing pressure on European refiners and fuel retailers to balance volatile international product prices with government efforts to limit the impact of energy costs on consumers.
Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/28/2026 - 02:00 Close
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 03:30:00 +0000 Never Trust Uncle Sam On Drugs
Never Trust Uncle Sam On Drugs
Never Trust Uncle Sam On Drugs
Authored by James Bovard via JimBovard.com ,
As the Covid-19 pandemic struck this nation, many Americans were stunned to see top federal health officials brazenly lie to buttress their own power. Bureaucrats and politicians unleashed themselves by shrouding how the feds bankrolled the creation of the pathogen, sanctifying a pseudo-miracle cure vaccine that was concocted almost overnight, and denying the vast collateral damage from effectively placing hundreds of millions of citizens under house arrest.
But there were precedents for all those crimes and follies in the federal war on drugs that began more than a century ago. That crusade established the right of federal officials to define reality and to scourge anyone who tried to reveal that federal Drug Czars were dangerous hucksters.
Federal contortions on marijuana are Exhibit A for why Americans should never trust Uncle Sam on drugs. For more than 50 years, the federal government shamelessly pretended that marijuana had no recognized medical use.
Last December 18, President Trump signed an executive order entitled, "Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research." Trump ordered the Attorney General and the Drug Enforcement Administration to speed up rule-making to finally enable far more medical research on the benefits of marijuana. On April 23, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that henceforth all "FDA-approved marijuana-derived products" and "State-licensed medical marijuana products" are shifted from Schedule 1 to Schedule 3 , a far less restrictive federal regulatory regime.
But the long history of federal persecution of marijuana users, researchers, and growers vivified the folly of trusting federal intervention to protect Americans' health.
Historical Context
During the 1920s, the US Department of Agriculture encouraged farmers to grow cannabis to boost their sagging incomes (hemp was used for such things as paper and rope). Marijuana also grew in popularity during the 1920s as a result of Prohibition, which inflated the price of alcohol by curtailing its availability.
During the Great Depression, Mexican immigrants surged into the United States searching for work and brought marijuana with them. Hostility toward the immigrants led to the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 , which effectively criminalized the possession of marijuana and, according to Yale professor David Musto, "mostly put a lot of jazz bands in jail."
Harvard Professor of Psychiatry Lester Grinspoon notes, "Between 1839 and 1900, more than a hundred articles on the therapeutic uses of marijuana appeared in scientific journals. As late as 1937, extract of cannabis was still a legitimate medicine marketed by drug companies." The American Medical Association testified at hearings that year urging that marijuana not be effectively banned. Unfortunately, Congress - bowing to the exhortations of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics - proclaimed in 1937 that marijuana had no medical value. Congress effectively prohibited any use of marijuana for ailing Americans. But simply because a majority of Congressmen say something doesn't make it true.
Federal Judges Need Not Apply
In 1972, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) petitioned the federal Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs to reclassify marijuana and recognize its medical uses. The director of the agency refused to consider the petition. NORML took the case to a federal appeals court, which issued a ruling that admonished the agency for rejecting the petition without "a reflective consideration and analysis."
In 1975, NORML sued the Drug Enforcement Administration (the successor agency to the Bureau) to force the agency to evaluate the evidence on whether Americans should have access to marijuana strictly for medicinal purposes. The DEA held a hearing, and a DEA administrative law judge found some merit in some of NORML's positions. But the chief of the DEA overturned those aspects of the judge's decision.
In 1977, a federal court of appeals criticized the DEA's final order and ordered the agency to reconsider the evidence for the medical benefits of marijuana.
In 1982, NORML petitioned the federal appeals court to force the DEA to follow the court's previous orders. That same year, the National Academy of Science's Institute of Medicine concluded: "Cannabis and its derivatives have shown promise in the treatment of a variety of disorders, [including] glaucoma, asthma, ... and in the nausea and vomiting of cancer chemotherapy."
In 1986, a DEA administrative law judge launched an extensive evaluation of the evidence for marijuana. DEA judge Francis Young spent two years conducting hearings and listening to scores of expert witnesses. Young ruled in 1988: "The marijuana plant is anything but a new drug....Uncontroverted evidence in this record indicates that marijuana was being used therapeutically by mankind 2,000 years before the birth of Christ. The evidence in this record clearly shows that marijuana has been accepted as capable of relieving the distress of great numbers of very ill people and doing so with safety under medical supervision. It would be unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious for a DEA to continue to stand between those sufferers and the benefits of this substance in the light of the evidence of this record."
How did the DEA respond to the evidence? DEA administrator John Lawn denounced the judge's finding as a "cruel and dangerous hoax" and refused to accept the judge's ruling. Lawn announced that the agency would only allow medical use of marijuana if it had already "currently accepted medical use." And since the DEA forbade any doctors from prescribing marijuana for medical use, that somehow meant that the agency must continue to ban its use in the future.
NORML sued again, appealing to a federal court to force the DEA to accept the recommendations of its own administrative law judge, and the court again compelled the DEA to reexamine the issue.
In March 1992, the DEA "reconsidered" and announced that it was right all along and that it would continue to ban any medical use of marijuana. DEA chief Robert Bonner decreed: "Lay testimonials, impressions of physicians, isolated case studies, random clinical experience, reports so lacking in details they cannot be scientifically evaluated and all other forms of anecdotal proof are entirely irrelevant."
Bonner got warmed up and showed some of the fervor that is the pride of DEA: "Beyond doubt, the claims that marijuana is medicine are false, dangerous and cruel. Sick men, women and children can be fooled by these claims and experiment with the drug. Instead of being helped, they risk serious side effects." Bonner acknowledged that he based his findings on the same testimony and documents that led DEA Administrative Law Judge Young to an opposite conclusion four years earlier. (Bonner denounced me for writing a Washington Times article exposing the DEA's chemical warfare on hapless Guatemalan farmers.)
As Harvard psychiatry professors Lester Grinspoon and James Bakalar noted at that time, "The Government's real concern is not that marijuana is ineffective as a medicine, but that it is too effective. The Government cannot acknowledge any of this because it has vastly exaggerated the dangers of marijuana for more than 50 years and is still committed to its war against the drug."
Pseudo-Science Trumps Democracy
Clinton's drug czar General Barry McCaffrey effectively claimed to be a wiser scientist than all the experts who researched marijuana's effects. On August 15, 1996, while campaigning in California against Proposition 215, which would have legalized the medical use of marijuana, McCaffrey declared: "There is not a shred of scientific evidence that shows that smoked marijuana is useful or needed. This is not science. This is not medicine. This is a cruel hoax." On December 30, 1996, when asked by a CNN reporter "is there any evidence...that marijuana is useful in a medical situation?" McCaffrey responded: "No, none at all. There are hundreds of studies that indicate that it isn't." McCaffrey ridiculed claims of marijuana's benefit as "Cheech 'n' Chong medicine."
After voters passed the proposition, the drug czar's office put out a press release warning: "The passage of [Proposition 215] creates a significant threat to the drug control system that protects our children....The decision to bring appropriate criminal or administrative enforcement action will be, as always, decided on a case-by-case basis." McCaffrey's warning sparked a vision of a DEA agent lurking underneath the desk of every doctor.
Federal judge Fern Smith issued a preliminary injunction on April 30, 1997, prohibiting the feds from punishing doctors: "The government's fear that frank dialogue between physicians and patients about medical marijuana might foster drug use...does not justify infringing the First Amendment...[T]his case is about the ability of doctors, on an individualized basis, to give advice and recommendations to bona fide patients suffering from serious, debilitating illnesses regarding the possible benefits of personal, medical use of small quantities of marijuana."
Clinton administration officials sneered at marijuana referendum results. Attorney General Janet Reno declared: "I don't think that the determination as to whether there is a medical, a scientific medical use of marijuana, should be made at the ballot box. I think it should be made in an informed way after appropriate scientific evaluation." And if government officials chose to ignore all the scientific evidence, then that was merely political science.
The Specter of Emaciated Chemo Patients
The federal government in 1978 began a program providing marijuana directly to a small number of people with illnesses that undeniably benefited from consuming marijuana, such as glaucoma and epilepsy. But the George H.W. Bush administration closed the program to any new entrants in 1992 after only eight people were certified - even though hundreds of thousands of people suffered from the same illnesses. The Clinton administration refused to reopen the program to new sufferers.
The Justice Department, in a 1999 brief, declared: "It became clear that the potential widespread use of marijuana for 'medical' purposes under the program...was bad public policy." According to the Justice Department, the first requisite of good public policy is to pretend that individual citizens do not exist.
In 1997, the CBS situation comedy Murphy Brown featured star Candice Bergen suffering from the aftereffects of chemotherapy. A friend provided her with some marijuana. DEA chief Thomas Constantine denounced CBS for "doing a great disservice" by "trivializing drug abuse" and "pandering to the libertarian supporters of an 'open society' and to the myths of legalization."
Constantine barked: "I am extremely troubled that at a time when teenage drug abuse is doubling...a television show of the caliber of Murphy Brown would portray marijuana as medicine. It is not medicine." Constantine promised to investigate "if any laws were broken" by broadcasting that show.
Clinton's drug policy was haunted by the specter of emaciated chemotherapy patients desperately needing something to stop their vomiting and fire their appetites. And nothing works better for this than smoking marijuana. The feds approved pills with THC, the active ingredient in marijuana; however, pills are scant help to someone heaving their guts.
Bluster from Washington political hacks failed to stop the cascade of new scientific evidence on the medicinal benefits of marijuana:
A 1997 study performed on animals at the University of California at San Francisco found that cannabinoids (the active ingredient in marijuana) can be an effective reliever of pain without the adverse side effects of opiates.
The American Journal of Psychiatry reported in 1999 that German researchers successfully used the major psychoactive ingredient in marijuana to treat Tourette's Syndrome (a complex neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by sudden spasms).
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reported in 1998 that marijuana may protect brain cells during a stroke.
British researchers revealed in 2000 that a marijuana compound was very effective in helping control the muscle spasms that afflict people with multiple sclerosis.
Clinton administration officials suppressed research results of United Nations affiliates that embarrassed the US drug war. The World Health Organization (WHO) completed a major study of marijuana's effects in 1997. The draft of the final report included a comparison of the adverse effects of cannabis with alcohol and tobacco. However, the WHO, bowing to pressure from the US government and other drug warriors, suppressed that chapter.
New Scientist , a British magazine, acquired a copy of the study and reported that in five out of seven categories of long-term health damage, alcohol was judged more harmful than marijuana. The report also observed that "in developed societies, cannabis appears to play little role in injuries caused by violence, as does alcohol."
Obama's Great Betrayal
In 2008, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama appeared to pledge an end to the persecution of medical marijuana users and providers: "What I'm not going to be doing is using Justice Department resources to try to circumvent state laws on this issue." Regardless, the Obama administration brought almost twice as many prosecutions against medical marijuana providers and users as did the George W. Bush administration.
Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project, complained in 2012 that "Obama has become more hostile to medical marijuana patients than any president in US history." A 2012 Time Magazine analysis noted that the DEA "has made it clear that medical marijuana is not medicine, and even called it a 'mortal danger.'"
Obama's repression of medical marijuana coincided with an explosion in abuse of prescription painkillers. A 2016 federal report estimated that 38 percent of adults had used prescription painkillers in the previous year, resulting in 19,000 deaths (more than the national homicide total). Medical marijuana is a proven painkiller, but the Obama administration (supported by pharmaceutical companies' campaign contributions and lobbying) scorned it. The National Institute on Drug Abuse torpedoed a 2011 research project testing whether "marijuana helps combat veterans with their post-traumatic stress disorder."
Generations of politicians and bureaucrats scorned the scientific evidence on marijuana to score "tough on crime" points. Anyone with an illness or malady that marijuana could help became merely collateral damage in the war on drugs. More than ten million Americans were arrested for marijuana to help prop up Washington's campaign to demonize weed and anyone who touched it.
Marijuana policy vivifies how federal policymakers were perpetually more interested in controlling and punishing Americans than in permitting citizens to find relief for all that ailed them. "When you mix politics and science, you get politics," observed John Barry in The Great Influenza , his history of the 1918 Spanish flu outbreak. Unfortunately, hard facts can rarely compete with massive national campaigns to demonize anyone who refuses to submit to the latest commands.
An earlier version of this piece was published by the Future of Freedom Foundation.
Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/27/2026 - 23:30 Close
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 03:05:00 +0000 The Strange Case Of NAC: The Supplement The FDA Says Isn't One
The Strange Case Of NAC: The Supplement The FDA Says Isn't One
N-acetyl cysteine, or NAC, is one of the most popular amino acid supplements in America . People take it for liver support afte
Read more.....
The Strange Case Of NAC: The Supplement The FDA Says Isn't One
N-acetyl cysteine, or NAC, is one of the most popular amino acid supplements in America . People take it for liver support after a long night, for their lungs and, lately, as a longevity staple . One brand among dozens, NOW, said in 2021 that it alone had sold "millions, perhaps billions" of NAC pills with no adverse event reports. NAC is also the latest supplement to land under the Eye of Sauron, otherwise known as the FDA.
The FDA's weapon is a clause in federal law: an ingredient approved as a drug, or authorized for serious study as one, before it was sold as a supplement can't be a supplement . The FDA has used the clause against red yeast rice , whose active compound is the same molecule as Merck's cholesterol drug lovastatin; against a form of vitamin B6 in 2009; against CBD after the seizure drug Epidiolex was approved; and against NMN in 2022, a ban it reversed in September 2025 after an industry lawsuit.
NAC's case is simpler on paper. It was approved as a drug in 1963, before it was sold as a supplement, the FDA says. What the agency has done with that fact since is anything but simple.
The latest turn: the FDA's own regulatory calendar set July 2026 as the target for a proposed rule on whether NAC can be sold as a supplement. July came and went with nothing published. When the White House released its 2026 regulatory agenda on July 30, the proposal was still listed with a July 2026 target , a date that had already passed.
The law firm Covington says the rule appears to cover NAC . If so, it would be the rulemaking the FDA said in 2022 it was "considering." Until it arrives, NAC sits where it has since 2020: officially not a supplement, sold as one because the FDA has chosen not to enforce.
It started with hangover pills. In July 2020, the FDA sent a warning letter to a company selling them, and buried in it was a new argument about NAC . According to the FDA , NAC "was approved as a new drug" on September 14, 1963, which meant products containing it were "excluded from the dietary supplement definition."
Attack On NAC!
Due to the looming threat of enforcement , in May 2021 Amazon said it was "removing the products in question from our store." The Council for Responsible Nutrition, a supplement trade group, petitioned the FDA in June 2021. The Natural Products Association followed in August, and in December it sued , calling the move "a regulatory sneak attack by the FDA."
In March 2022, the FDA denied the petitions' core request and repeated that "NAC is excluded from the definition of a dietary supplement." Then it blinked. Final guidance that August said the agency would "exercise enforcement discretion" for certain NAC products , since "our initial review has not revealed safety concerns," and that it was "considering initiating rulemaking." NAC was back on Amazon by late August, and the NPA dropped its suit that November.
Recall:
The FDA said in 2020 that NAC isn't a supplement because it was approved as a drug in 1963.
Amazon pulled NAC in 2021, then relisted it in 2022 after the FDA said it would hold off.
The FDA's July 2026 target for a rule came and went, so NAC remains in legal limbo.
What NAC Actually Does
NAC is a building block for glutathione, the body's main internal antioxidan t. That's why hospitals reach for it after an acetaminophen overdose. The IV version, Acetadote , works by restoring glutathione, which the liver burns through trying to neutralize the overdose.
In a 2018 trial , 1,200 mg of NAC a day for 30 days restored glutathione levels for people with deficiencies , and their endurance improved with it. NAC supports glutathione when you're short on it; it isn't a booster for everyone.*
It's also very safe. A review of 41 studies in patients with chronic lung disease, at 600 to 3,000 mg a day, found the "safety profile was similar at both the high and standard doses."
Meanwhile, many have been turning to NAC for potential longevity benefits . At Baylor College of Medicine, Dr. Rajagopal Sekhar's team gave 12 older adults a mix of glycine and NAC, which they call GlyNAC, for 16 weeks against 12 on placebo. They reported faster walking, a stronger grip and red blood cell glutathione up 225% . Granted - the doses were big, about 7 grams each of glycine and NAC a day for a 70 kg adult.
And now, where to get some
Neuro Ignite is a caffeine-free daily energy mix offered by IQ Biologix, built around 1,000 mg of NAC per dose - right inside the 600 to 3,000 mg a day range covered by the safety review above. Each two-scoop serving adds 1,000 mg each of vitamin C, taurine and glycine, plus magnesium and creatine - and beet root. So instead of stimulating your nervous system, it gives your brain the raw materials it runs on - eight ingredients covering antioxidant defense, cellular energy and neurotransmitter production
The 450 mg of creatine contributes to 3 to 5 grams a day that sports nutrition researchers recommend (grab that here ).
Right now it's buy one, get one free : add two jars to your cart and the second is free. That's 60 servings for $44.95. The deal ends Sunday, October 11, or sooner if we sell out.
Support yourself & support the site: get yours here .
*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/27/2026 - 23:05 Close
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 02:15:00 +0000 Nicki Minaj Blasts Democrats For Treating The Black Vote Like It's Theirs
Nicki Minaj Blasts Democrats For Treating The Black Vote Like It's Theirs
Rapper Nicki Minaj urged young Americans to vote Republican in the upcoming midterm elections during an appearance on Fox's My View with
Read more.....
Nicki Minaj Blasts Democrats For Treating The Black Vote Like It's Theirs
Rapper Nicki Minaj urged young Americans to vote Republican in the upcoming midterm elections during an appearance on Fox's My View with Lara Trump , according to comments Fox News reported Sunday. Minaj, a supporter of President Donald Trump, also accused the Democratic Party of discouraging black voters from breaking with the party.
Nicki Minaj - July 9, 2023 in Los Angeles, California. Christopher Polk for WWD She kicked things off with a blunt call to "vote red."
"You know how much you want a say in what happens and realize that the only way to have that is by voting, not just voting for the president, but just voting and, you know, all of the local elections. Right? " she said. "But I want you guys to do your research, see what candidates are in your area, you know, and just give it a couple, you know, a few minutes or an hour. Research them and then make a decision. You guys are so blessed to be able to vote. And you have to, more than ever now, you have to take advantage of that ability that you guys have to be able to vote, please. And vote red."
Then Lara Trump asked whether she thought that "there are more people out there who vote for Democrats not because they like their policies and the politics themselves, but because they feel like they're supposed to vote for Democrats?"
"I think it's changing now, but obviously, for a very long time, black people specifically feel that they should just vote blue, " Minaj said. "I would say the entire country, there's been a major shift where people are starting to wake up and see what's going on and choose differently. "
The Grammy-nominee first came out in support of Trump in November 2025, after Trump spoke out about violence against Christians in Nigeria. She publicly thanked Trump for taking the issue seriously, marking a sharp change from her earlier criticism of his immigration policies. By December, she was openly praising Trump and JD Vance at Turning Point USA's AmericaFest, calling them "role models" and saying she had "utmost respect and admiration" for Trump.
"Black people are not allowed, according to the Democrats, for the most part, to make a different decision," she told Lara Trump. "We're not allowed to think, we're not allowed to voice concerns, to make an argument as to why we don't like a particular candidate."
Plenty of evidence backs this up. Joe Biden infamously told radio host Charlamagne tha God in 2020 that "you ain't black" if he had trouble picking between him and Trump.
In 2021, "Uncle Tim" trended on Twitter after Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) delivered the Republican response to Joe Biden's 2021 joint address to Congress. Justice Clarence Thomas has received similar attacks for decades.
Minaj noted that black voters who aren't in line with the Democrats face "smear campaigns and just outright nasty behavior from these adults."
"It just doesn't look good," she added. "And so the Democrats kind of have been just digging their own grave in that way and they're not understanding that people can see them ."
And, according to Minaj, black voters are catching on. "And now they feel, 'Oh, okay. So you only love me and respect me when I do as you say and don't ask any questions,'" she said. "And no one wants to be treated that way."
Asked by Lara Trump what she saw in Democrats that "led you to believe that perhaps they did not have the best interest of the country or for you in mind," Minaj accused the party of becoming "way too caught up in pop culture," arguing it has let its romance with the entertainment industry spiral out of control. "I think that they've allowed their relationships with artists to cause them to act like children and to be so petty and childish. But that's what I think they do. They allow people in the music industry to influence them. And these people clearly don't have their best interests at heart. These people have their egos at heart."
Tyler Durden
Sun, 09/27/2026 - 22:15 Close