CMR is the leading provider
of funding and management
support for small to
medium-sized businesses and
entrepreneurs
Established 1984 C MR
is the leading venture
capital, management
support and business
services provider for
small to medium-sized
businesses - linking
excellent management
skills with the
substantial financial
resources of a global bank
of private investors.
CMR has over 450 senior
executives, operating
in the UK, USA, Europe, Asia,
Australasia and
globally,
providing both funding and
specialist help for
entrepreneurial
businesses .
For Businesses
CMR provides excellent
resources:
CMR FundEX Business Exchange - gives all companies & entrepreneurs direct access to CMR's global investor base.
CMR Catalyst Group
Programme -
transform
profitability through
merging.
CMR Company Sales Division helps owners to exit
at the best price.
CMR Corporate Recovery
Division -
experts in rescue and
turnaround.
CMR Technology Licensing
Division -
commercialising
innovation.
CMR Executive
Professionals - management support
and consultancy.
CMR Executives-on-Demandâ„¢ Fully experienced
senior executives
available quickly and
cost effectively.
We always welcome
contact with new
business clients- please get in touch
- we will do our
best to match
your needs and exceed
your expectations.
For Investors
Preferential access to new opportunities for investment and/or acquisition
P re-vets
propositions and
provides a
personalised service
to our investors
Syndication service
enabling investors to
link together as desired
Executive and
management support for
investments as needed
CMR's services to
our investors are not
only fast & efficient
but also free
W e
always appreciate new
members- you are welcome
to join as an investor
or as a CMR Executive.
When you
join us as a Senior
Executive:
CMR's strength is in the
skills and experience of
our executive members -
all senior, director level
people with years of
successfully running and
managing companies.
Because the demand for
CMR's support and services
is ever-increasing,
especially as we enter
recessionary times, we
have a growing need for
more high calibre
executives to join us from
every industry and
discipline.
You will be using your
considerable experience to
help smaller businesses
and entrepreneurs to grow
profitably.
We offer full training
and mentoring support to
help maximise potential.
We are
always keen to find more
high calibre senior
executives in all areas-
skills and location.
Make contact with us today
and maximise your
opportunities.
HEAD
OFFICE
124 City Road
London EC1 2NX
Tel: +44 (0)207-636-1744
Fax:+44 (0)207-636-5639
Email: cmr@cmruk.com
Registered Office:
124 City Road ,
London EC1 2NX
Also Glasgow,
Dublin, Switzerland, Europe, USA/Canada
Privacy Statement: CMR only
retains personal details
supplied directly by executives
joining CMR themselves either as
Full Executive Members or
Interim Management Members or
Investors. Those details are
only used within CMR and not
disclosed to any third parties
without that person’s
agreement. We will keep that
data until requested by the
person to be removed – at that
point it will be deleted.
Personal data is never sold or
used for purposes outside of
CMR’s normal operations. Any
correspondence should be
directed to the Managing
Director, CMR,
Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London EC1V
2N
Senior Executives
CMR is a worldwide network of senior executives. Join us to expand your career and business horizons.
Business Entrepreneurs
CMR has a complete range of resources & services provided by experts to help all businesses to grow and prosper.
Investors & Venturers
CMR has a continuous stream of business and funding propositions, which are matched to investor preferences. Join us - it's FREE!
FundEX
FundEX is CMR's worldwide stock market for small to medium sized companies and entrepreneurs to raise new capital.
Interim & Permanent Management
Many of CMR's executives can be recruited on an interim, permanent or NED basis.
Login
Main CMR Intranet members only
Regional Intranets
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 18:05:00 +0000 Voters Head To Polls In First 2026 Primary Election: What To Know
Voters Head To Polls In First 2026 Primary Election: What To Know
Voters Head To Polls In First 2026 Primary Election: What To Know
Authored by Joseph Lord via The Epoch Times,
Today, voters in Texas and North Carolina will cast their ballots in the first major contested primary elections of the 2026 midterm elections.
The elections in the two states have high stakes for the control of Congress in 2027.
The Texas Senate primaries for both parties have become some of the most closely watched in the nation, as Democrats vie for an upset victory over the GOP nominee in the general election.
In North Carolina, meanwhile, Republican candidates are facing off for their party’s nominations in a district redrawn to favor the GOP.
Here’s what to know.
Texas Republican Primary
While both parties are investing substantial resources and attention toward the race to be the Lone Star state’s next senator, Republicans enter the race with a strong advantage after President Donald Trump won the state by more than 14 points in 2024.
The incumbent in the race, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), is facing one of the toughest primary challenges of his career from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas) is also seeking the Republican nomination.
Political analysts and betting markets largely view Paxton and Cornyn as the leading contenders.
Paxton entered the race earlier this year, carrying lingering fallout from past controversies, including his 2023 impeachment by the Texas House and subsequent acquittal by the Texas Senate. Framing the contest in ideological terms, Paxton has cast the race as a showdown between his brand of populist “America First” conservatism and what he describes as the establishment politics embodied by Cornyn.
Cornyn, meanwhile, has characterized the primary as a referendum on character, pointing to Paxton’s impeachment proceedings and other legal issues. At a recent campaign event, Cornyn accused Paxton of a “scandal-plagued career” and warned that he could be a “dead weight” on the ballot.
Paxton currently holds a 3.8 lead over Cornyn in RealClearPolitics polling averages.
Trump has yet to say which candidate he will endorse but has expressed his appreciation for both.
Texas Democratic Primary
Given the historically favorable national political environment for the party of the opposition in the midterm elections, Democrats are hoping for a long-shot win in the Lone Star State’s Senate election this year.
Texas state Rep. James Talarico led the pack of potential Democratic nominees, though polls show the possibility of a close race with U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), who entered the race on Oct. 8 last year.
Talarico rose to prominence during the redistricting battle this summer as Texas Republicans voted to add five Republican districts to the state’s congressional map. The former seminarian has gained national media and online attention for his Christian-focused messaging.
Crockett has become well-known for her heated questions during hearings on Capitol Hill.
Former Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas) had been running but ended his bid for the nomination after Crockett announced her candidacy.
According to recent polling averages from RealClearPolitics, Talarico is leading Crockett by 4.5 percent.
In hypothetical polling match-ups, surveys said Talarico would be advantaged in a race against Paxton, but is disfavored if Republicans select Cornyn as their nominee.
Meanwhile, polling currently has Crockett at a disadvantage against either of the major Republican candidates.
The primary race will be held on March 3, and any runoff races are scheduled for May 26.
North Carolina’s 1st District Republican Primary
In North Carolina’s First Congressional District, Rep. Don Davis (D-N.C.) is running for reelection in a district that was redrawn through redistricting.
Davis won a second term in 2024 by less than 2 percent, becoming one of 13 House Democrats to win elections in districts won by Trump. He’s criticized the new boundaries for his districts, which now favor Republicans.
He faces no opposition in the Democratic primary, while five Republicans are vying for their party’s nomination.
Among them is Army veteran and former Trump administration official Laurie Buckhout, who is seeking a rematch after narrowly losing to Davis in 2024.
State Sen. Bobby Hanig, former sheriff Asa Buck, and Lenoir County Commissioner Eric Rouse are other political notables in the district seeking the nomination.
Rounding out the GOP field is attorney and small-business owner Ashley-Nicole Russell.
North Carolina’s 11th District Democratic Primary
In North Carolina’s 11th Congressional District, five Democrats are competing in the primary for the opportunity to take on incumbent Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-N.C.).
Although Edwards won reelection comfortably in 2024, Democrats are hoping to win enough support to flip the seat in the upcoming election.
The Democratic field includes farmer Jamie Ager, educator and advocate Zelda Briarwood, physician Richard Hudspeth, cancer researcher and professor Paul Maddox, and civil engineer Lee Whipple.
Ager is centering his campaign on lowering everyday costs, expanding access to health care, advancing immigration reform, and strengthening public safety. An internal Democratic poll shared with Newsweek shows Ager leading Edwards by 1 percentage point.
Briarwood is advocating for increased investment in rural health care, expanding Medicaid, limiting private equity ownership of residential housing, and making community college tuition-free.
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 13:05 Close
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 17:45:05 +0000 'If Iran Had Nukes, They Would've Used It,' Trump Amid Regional War Spiral, Oil Disruptions
'If Iran Had Nukes, They Would've Used It,' Trump Amid Regional War Spiral, Oil Disruptions
Here are the most critical developments unfolding in the US-Iran conflict:
'If Iran Had Nukes, They Would've Used It,' Trump Amid Regional War Spiral, Oil Disruptions
Here are the most critical developments unfolding in the US-Iran conflict:
Trump tries to articular war justification : says if we have a little high oil prices, could be for a little while, but they will drop, and could even be below the levels before, but that he 'had to' act or else Iran would have 'used nukes'. Claims Israel didn't force America's hand. Admits leadership vacuum .
The Pentagon has released Operation Epic Fury's objectives ; 1- Demilitarization of Iran: destruction of its missile forces, production facilities, and naval fleet 2- Elimination of the terrorist regime 3- Protection of the United States from current and future threats 4- Ensuring that Iran does not possess nuclear weapons
UAE mulling joining US-Israel attack on Iran, and the Saudis too , to stop Iranian missile and drone strikes on their countries.
The American Embassy in Riyadh has been hit in another drone attack , with WSJ reporting it was struck twice Tuesday, resulting in damage to the roof. More embassies across region are shuttering, including the US Embassy in Beirut.
President Trump mulling arming anti-Tehran militias . But he hasn't decided yet while urging Iranians to rise up and be Washington's 'boots on the ground.'
The Israelis just struck the meeting of the Iranian Supreme Council where officials were gathering to choose a new Supreme Leader, a senior Israeli official told Fox News. "Israel struck while they were counting the votes for the appointment of the supreme leader."
US-Israel bombing is expanding inside Iran . Explosions heard in the northwestern cities of Tabriz and Urmia, as the capital no longer the only focus.
Iraq's crude oil output is being significantly curtailed . An update from Iraq specifies a shutdown of 460,000 bpd at West Qurna 2 and a cut of 700,000 bpd at Rumaila, while warning that more than 3 million bpd could be forced offline in the coming days if tanker access remains limited.
Export crude bottlenecks are developing across Iraq . Storage at southern export terminals is nearing critical capacity because tanker traffic in the Strait of Hormuz has been paralyzed. Iraq has also halted most Kurdistan-to-Turkey exports via Ceyhan, leaving only about 50,000 bpd for domestic use.
Iranian retaliation expanded on Tuesday, with Gulf states' energy infrastructure hit by multiple drones . This included a drone strike on Fujairah in the UAE, a key bunkering and crude-loading hub outside the Strait of Hormuz, as well as a drone strike at the Port of Salalah in Oman.
The U.S.-Israeli operation against Iran is intensifying . Strikes are said to be hitting major targets, including state media, military command sites, and leadership compounds, with the reported Iranian death toll rising to 787 since the start of Operation Epic Fury.
The war is spreading into a broader regional conflict . Israel has expanded attacks into Lebanon, including renewed strikes on Beirut and a ground move into the south, while regional actors such as Qatar and possibly Saudi Arabia are portrayed as being drawn more directly into the conflict.
* * *
Update(12:45ET) : To quote Rumsfeld there are many "unknowns" as the Iraq Iran war continues to go regional, but a Tuesday Oval Office press conference saw Trump try and articulate war justifications. A quick summary:
President Trump spoke at the White House alongside visiting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, declaring the military campaign against Iran a decisive success. “We’re doing very well,” Trump said.
“They have no navy; it’s been knocked out. They have no air force; it’s been knocked out. They have no air detection — that’s been knocked out,” he stated, adding that Iran’s radar systems and “just about everything’s been knocked out.”
Pressed in the Oval Office on why there was no evacuation plan for Americans in the Middle East before Saturday’s strikes, Trump said, “Well, because it happened all very quickly.”
“I thought we were going to have a situation where we were going to be attacked. They were getting ready to attack Israel,” he said.
When asked whether Israel had “forced” his hand, Trump replied, “No, actually, I might have forced their hand.”
Addressing speculation about Iran’s future leadership, Trump referenced Reza Pahlavi. “He seems like a very nice person. But it seems to me that someone from within might be better” to take over, he said.
Trump acknowledged the risks of regime change. “I guess the worst case would be, we do this, and then somebody takes over who’s as bad as the previous person, right?” he said. “That could happen. We don’t want that to happen.”
Defending the timing of the strike, Trump said, “You see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack. If we didn’t do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that .”
And finally: very GW Bush style ...
If we hadn't attacked Iran, it would have already started a nuclear war with many countries, because "they are pure evil and sick in the head" - Trump.
* * *
Update(11:15ET) : American or regional officials have confirmed that the US Embassy in Riyadh has come under drone attack twice on Tuesday resulting in the roof suffering a partial collapse.
Part of the building is engulfed in smoke, with staff said to be sheltering in place. An earlier State Dept statement said: "Embassy Riyadh has been struck by two UAVs that hit the roof and the perimeter of the chancery." The cable added: "Post is sheltering in place and reported no injuries." Initial reports say no casualties, according to a person familiar with the incident. Meanwhile...
Saudi Arabia condemns ‘flagrant’ Iranian drone attack on US Embassy in Riyadh - Al Arabiya English
Scenes from on the ground in Tehran:
* * *
Update(0920ET) : In a massive though not completely unexpected development, Iraq has shut down 460,000 barrels per day of production at the West Qurna 2 field, Iraqi oil officials told Reuters. Officials warned the country will be forced to cut more than 3 million barrels per day within days if oil tankers cannot move freely and access loading terminals, as confirmed in Bloomberg.
On Tuesday, Iraq reduced output at the Rumaila oil field by 700,000 barrels per day . Rumaila is the second-largest oil field in the world, and storage levels at southern export terminals have reached critical capacity due to disruptions and slowdowns in tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, according to local officials.
Importantly, Iraq also halted crude exports from its semi-autonomous Kurdistan region through the key pipeline to Turkey’s port of Ceyhan, according to sources cited by Bloomberg. Roughly 200,000 barrels per day have been shut in as producers cut output amid escalating regional conflict. Only about 50,000 barrels per day are now being produced for domestic use.
Energy infrastructure in northern Kurdistan has faced repeated attacks during prior unrest. And now with major fields throttling output and exports constrained, oil prices are surging .
Targeting Gulf production from across water in Iran....
* * *
Israeli and US forces pressed forward with their assault on Iran, striking targets across the country, including Iran's state broadcaster and central military command centers, as the official death toll has climbed to 787 Iranians killed since the start of the Trump-ordered Operation Epic Fury. The US has sustained at least six troop deaths and several more seriously wounded.
Fears that this could open to a broader multi-front war appear to be coming to reality, as at the same time Israel escalated operations on a second front, intensifying airstrikes on Lebanon and launching a new ground incursion into the south . Beirut is once again under Israeli bombs , after Israel accused Hezbollah of firing rockets on the north. What's more is that Kann News is citing a senior Israeli official as follows: We assess that Saudi Arabia will attack Iran soon after it was attacked yesterday . The war is expanding.
Beirut on fire, via AP
The conflict has continued to spread across the Gulf. Saudi authorities said two drones struck the US Embassy in Riyadh , igniting a small fire and causing minor damage. However, there's been surprisingly little information or video to come out of this major incident.
Qatar has formally joined the war on the US-Israeli side , having already said it took out a pair of Iranian jets. The tiny oil and gas rich GCC country Foreign Ministry stated that "the two Iranian planes shot down by Qatar yesterday were flying toward Doha and were warned before being shot down. Qatar is searching for the pilots ."
Iran has continued its retaliation by targeting energy infrastructure across the Gulf, driving global oil and gas prices sharply higher. As we reported previously, Qatar's state-owned petroleum company suspended all LNG production after two of its facilities were hit.
The status of the vital Strait of Hormuz remains a big unknown , with Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announcing that the vital oil transit chokepoint for roughly one-fifth of global oil consumption is now "closed". While the consensus is that after the US blew up all or most of the Iranian Navy's vessels , it doesn't have the maritime power to effect a blockage, the IRGC can certainly wreak havoc through its drone and missile arsenal .
Iran has also continued missile attacks on Israel, with the Israeli military reporting interceptions over West Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Eilat. At least 10 people have been killed in Israel since Saturday. Many dozens, possibly in the hundreds, have been injured and wounded. Fox live shots and correspondent on the ground Trey Yingst have been offering proof that Israel's anti-air defenses are routinely being overwhelmed and significant impacts have resulted.
Costly interceptors are also being expended at a high rate across the Gulf, and these countries are urgently appealing for more from Washington, but they will soon be in short supply at this rate. The Wall Street Journal warns as follows :
Persian Gulf nations targeted by Iran have, so far, managed to limit the damage by deploying sophisticated U.S.-made air defenses against the hundreds of drones and missiles that have rained on their cities.
With costly interceptors and radar, all integrated with the U.S. military, the oil-rich Gulf Arab states have fielded some of the most advanced air defenses in the world, despite their small populations and militaries.
A crucial variable in this war , however, is whether these monarchies start running out of interceptors before the Iranian regime runs out of projectiles. At current burn rates, it could be very soon .
Alarmingly, initial White House talking points of a 'limited' campaign of mere days (and based on pre-war comments during the build-up) have now gone out the window as on Monday President Trump and Secretary Rubio indicated the operation could run for roughly four or five weeks . But they also admitted there's a basically open-ended timeline to "do whatever it takes" to eliminate Tehran’s missile and nuclear capabilities, and to destroy the country's missile arsenal.
But then here's what the Trump administration failed to take into account, or perhaps chose to completely ignore. Trita Parsi told The Economist :
"This is not a monarchy in which the shah is gone and you take out all of the male heirs." He explained: "This is a system—not a particularly popular system—but nevertheless one with a security establishment that is not dependent on a single person or a single family ."
Pentagon brass doesn't seem to know what the plan is, how long it will last, or why they're there: "The hours, days, and perhaps weeks ahead will challenge you. There will be noise and confusion ."
There are reports that in the instance of the Ayatollah's death under US-Israeli bombs, which is the first thing that happened Saturday as he was apparently not in hiding, Iran put a strict emergency protocol in place. This reportedly involved plans for the IRGC and various military units across the country to begin acting autonomously within their respective chains of command, so that a state decapitation strike won't disrupt the ongoing retaliation .
That retaliation has already killed at least six US service members stationed at Gulf bases :
The U.S. is facing increasing risks to its military forces and diplomatic presence in the Middle East as Iran is launching waves of missile and drone attacks across the region that are testing its ability to defend a swath of territory.
U.S. Central Command said that six servicemembers had been killed in the three-day-old campaign on Monday. The six died in a drone strike on a base in Kuwait, The Wall Street Journal reported. Separately, three American F-15 jets were downed by apparent friendly fire over Kuwait on Monday, in one of the most significant losses of equipment for the U.S. in the operation.
Bases that house U.S. forces have also come under attack in Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain .
In at least one instance troops were in a mobile trailer which served as a makeshift command center or office when an Iranian projectile hit.
The White House has meanwhile said it is not at all in diplomatic contact with the Iranians , who may want to impose a deeper cost before even starting a discussion for an offramp - and it's the same with the Gulf states - there doesn't seem to be any top-level contact.
Rubio and Hegseth have kept repeating that "this is not Iraq" and have insisted this is not another Neocon "endless war". They might be right in that what just opened up might prove far worse than the Iraq war . So far there's no US boots on the ground that we know of, but we're already at that admin talking point of 'we haven't ruled it out'. White House leadership has also been surprisingly open as to Israel's role in the US decision to attack Iran .
More latest headlines via Newsquawk:
Israeli defence forces announce that they did not deploy ground troops in Iran, Israeli source report.
The IDF announces that they have struck Iran's leadership compound in Tehran.
IAEA confirms recent damage to entrance buildings of Iran's underground Natanz fuel enrichment plan.
Israel's Home Front announce early warning after detection of rockets fired from Iran toward Israel, Al Jazeera reported.
Israeli Military Spokesperson said it is not likely that Israel will deploy ground forces to Iran as it is not practical.
IDF spokesperson said launches detected from Iran and alerts expected in the northern area from the Golan to northern Sharon.
Iran's military said it targeted the Al Udeid base with missiles.
Iran's IRCG said they targeted the aircraft carrier "Lincoln" with 4 cruise missiles; The aircraft carrier "Lincoln" headed towards the southeastern Indian Ocean , Al Arabiya reported.
Member of Iran’s Assembly of Experts said choosing a successor to Supreme Leader Khamenei “won’t take long”, according to ISNA.
Hezbollah said it targeted the Ramat David Air Base in northern Israel.
US VP Vance said President Trump wants to make sure Iran never had nuclear weapons, adds the US has a lot of capacity in Iran.
US President Trump held a call with Kurdish leaders in Iraq on Sunday to discuss the US-Israel war with Iran and what might come next, according to three sources with knowledge of the called cited by Axios.
US is said to prepare for a 'pickup' of attacks in Iran during the next 24 hours, according to CNN.
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 12:45 Close
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 17:45:00 +0000 Drone Strikes On Amazon Data Centers In Middle East Reveal Urgent Need To Defend AI
Drone Strikes On Amazon Data Centers In Middle East Reveal Urgent Need To Defend AI
For the first time in modern warfare , Iranian kamikaze drones struck commercial data centers in the Middle East Read more.....
Drone Strikes On Amazon Data Centers In Middle East Reveal Urgent Need To Defend AI
For the first time in modern warfare , Iranian kamikaze drones struck commercial data centers in the Middle East operated by Amazon . This marks a major escalation in the targeting of civilian digital infrastructure.
Amazon wrote on its website that three Middle East data centers were hit by Iranian drones , causing widespread outages at Amazon Web Services facilities tied to the "ongoing conflict in the Middle East."
"These strikes have caused structural damage , disrupted power delivery to our infrastructure, and in some cases required fire suppression activities that resulted in additional water damage," the company said in a post on Monday on AWS's health dashboard.
Operations in the Middle East remain "significantly impaired," AWS said, noting that "customers are experiencing elevated error rates and degraded availability for services."
The entire 'bomb the data center' incident led us to write a note on Monday morning titled, "Modern Warfare Sees First Drone Strike on a Commercial Data Center ." This marks a first in a world where Morgan Stanley's Vishwanath Tirupattur recently forecasted that $3 trillion in global data center spending will occur through 2028. Translation: there's a massive security gap in defending data centers from aerial threats.
We first outlined the theme in a late January note titled "Explosion in AI Data Center Buildouts Will Demand Next-Gen Counter-Drone Security."
Our view at the time was:
Wall Street analysts largely end their analysis at the financing and construction of next-generation data centers, with limited discussion regarding the modern security architecture required once these facilities are built and become instant high-value targets for non-state actors or foreign adversaries ; traditional perimeter measures such as metal chainlink fencing and standard surveillance systems are rendered useless in the world of emerging AI threats, including coordinated autonomous drone or swarm-based attacks enabled by advances in AI and low-cost unmanned systems.
The key takeaway is that Wall Street analysts and data center developers have just received a major wake-up call: trillions of dollars in planned data center buildouts will require next-generation security, including high-tech counter-drone detection, tracking, and kinetic interception systems. This follows the Ukraine war and other recent modern battlefields, which have sparked the hyper-development of cheap, dual-use, consumer-grade drones that can be mass-produced at a fraction of the cost of traditional air-delivered munitions. We said weeks ago, this proliferation of drones and AI kill chains has given readers a glimpse of the 2030s battlefield .
Our view is that Wall Street will now begin searching for "war unicorns " specializing in counter-threat systems, whether in detection, electronic warfare, or kinetic defenses, as the world appears increasingly unstable and the need to harden critical data center infrastructure against FPV and other drone threats becomes a national security threat.
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 12:45 Close
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 17:15:00 +0000 Zelensky Warns Iran War Could Starve Ukraine Of Critical US Arms
Zelensky Warns Iran War Could Starve Ukraine Of Critical US Arms
This isn't the first time the world's attention has shifted away from the Ukraine war, but it certainly marks the biggest other conflict to erupt throughout t
Read more.....
Zelensky Warns Iran War Could Starve Ukraine Of Critical US Arms
This isn't the first time the world's attention has shifted away from the Ukraine war, but it certainly marks the biggest other conflict to erupt throughout the four-year long war in Eastern Europe.
Every time there is a 'distraction' - President Zelensky takes pains to try and refocus attention on Kiev's plight, quite naturally. At a moment the depth of American arms supplies and ammo stockpiles are in question given the rate of expenditure in the new Iran war , the Ukrainians are rather nervous to say the least .
Zelensky has freshly warned that deeper US involvement in the conflict with Iran could disrupt the steady flow of American weapons that Ukraine depends on in its war against Russia. Of course, Ukraine was issuing desperate pleas for more arms and ammo even long before Trump's Operation Epic Fury kicked off.
via Reuters
On slowed arms flows, he said as quoted in WSJ :
“We understand that a long war–if it is long–and the intensity of the military actions will affect the amount of air defense we receive," Zelensky told reporters on Monday, according to audio of his remarks published by Ukrainian media.
Zelensky said he spoke to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz about the issue of weapons supplies to Ukraine, and was in contact with other allies. So far, he added, there are no signs of any delays.
“Everyone understands that, for us, this is a matter of life,” Zelensky said of the arms Ukraine receives through the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List, or PURL, a program European allies use to purchase weapons from the U.S. for Ukraine.
But then again America's Gulf allies, who are also desperate for anti-air replenishment, consider this moment a matter of life and death too.
WSJ notes further, "Ukraine has said it desperately needs PAC-3 interceptor missiles for the Patriot systems supplied by the U.S."
Further, "The U.S. has been using its own Patriot systems to protect U.S. military bases and the airspace of allied countries in the Middle East from Iranian retaliatory strikes."
So it seems like Zelensky's arms wish list will be further delayed - not for lack of money, but simply based on rate of slow replenishment, but mostly Washington's new conflict theatre priority: Iran and the Gulf . What's worse is that the war is already threatening expansion across the whole Mideast region, as the conflict spreads to Lebanon.
Still, Ukraine has come out in favor of Trump's strike on Iran, given especially that Russia uses Iranian suicide drones in the Ukraine conflict, and has from nearly the start.
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 12:15 Close
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:55:00 +0000 Oil Tumbles As Trump Considers Insurance Aid For Tankers
Oil Tumbles As Trump Considers Insurance Aid For Tankers
The price of crude instantly tumbled on Tuesday after the Trump administration is reportedly considering providing, or assisting in obtaining insurance for oil tankers
Read more.....
Oil Tumbles As Trump Considers Insurance Aid For Tankers
The price of crude instantly tumbled on Tuesday after the Trump administration is reportedly considering providing, or assisting in obtaining insurance for oil tankers crossing through the strait of Hormuz.
According to Reuters , "U.S. President Donald Trump will review policy options on Tuesday aimed at controlling energy prices following recent attacks linked to Iran, including a proposal to help oil tankers transiting conflict zones to obtain insurance , according to two sources familiar with the matter."
Ships have been frozen on either side of the strait after insurers instituted "war policies" that wouldn't pay out.
Supertanker costs in the Middle East have hit ?all-time highs, according to shipping data and industry sources on Tuesday, as the U.S.-Iran conflict intensifies with Tehran attacking ships passing through the ?Strait of Hormuz.
The immediate reaction was a plunge in crude prices...
And as we suggested earlier today...
The news comes after the commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards said that the strait of Hormuz is closed and that Iran would target any ship trying to pass through.
Carter Doctrine meets Trump Doctrine?
If President Trump were to provide U.S. Treasury-backed war-risk insurance or direct naval assistance to oil tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, it would amount to a modernized fusion of the Carter Doctrine with Trump-style economic statecraft. In 1980, Jimmy Carter declared the Persian Gulf a vital U.S. interest and pledged to use “any means necessary” - up to and including the use of military force - to prevent outside powers from controlling it. That doctrine institutionalized a permanent American security guarantee over Gulf energy flows , eventually embodied in the creation of United States Central Command and the U.S. naval presence that still patrols the region. Its core premise was simple: energy security is national security.
A Trump-era move to insure or financially backstop tanker traffic through Hormuz would preserve that core premise but update the mechanism . While the exact details of the insurance proposal are unknown - rather than relying solely on overt military escalation to reopen the strait, Washington could absorb shipping risk, stabilize insurance markets, and allow tankers to sail under U.S. guarantees - with naval force as a backstop rather than the opening move. In effect, it would convert a military red line into a market-stability red line. Iran’s leverage depends on panic: if oil spikes toward $100–$120 because traffic halts for weeks, global recession pressure mounts. But if the U.S. neutralizes that panic through financial guarantees and controlled deterrence, the chokepoint loses much of its coercive power.
The result would be a hybrid doctrine: Carter’s hard-power commitment to freedom of navigation combined with Trump’s preference for leverage, economic tools, and time-bound pressure rather than open-ended intervention. It would signal that the United States will not allow the weaponization of energy chokepoints - not just through force, but through balance-sheet power.
Developing...
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 11:55 Close
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:30:00 +0000 "I'd Be Angry, Too": Jamie Dimon Says Trump Debanking Suit Has No Merit, Then Rails Debanking Practices
"I'd Be Angry, Too": Jamie Dimon Says Trump Debanking Suit Has No Merit, Then Rails Debanking Practices
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said Monday that Donald Trump’s $5 billion lawsuit over the closure of his accounts “has no merit
Read more.....
"I'd Be Angry, Too": Jamie Dimon Says Trump Debanking Suit Has No Merit, Then Rails Debanking Practices
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said Monday that Donald Trump’s $5 billion lawsuit over the closure of his accounts “has no merit,” but added, “They have the right to be angry. I’d be angry, too.”
Trump claims JPMorgan and other banks shut his accounts for political reasons, according to CNBC . Dimon said banks are often “forced” to debank clients due to legal and regulatory pressures tied to reputational risk. “We debank people because it causes legal, regulatory risk for us,” he said, noting it’s easier for banks to avoid that risk.
Trump sued JPMorgan and Dimon in January, part of a broader legal campaign that also includes claims against Capital One, media outlets, and the IRS. JPMorgan has acknowledged closing dozens of Trump-related accounts after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack.
“But I agree with them,” Dimon said during an interview in Miami. “Like, why is a bank allowed to do that?”
CNBC writes that though no single law mandates dropping clients over reputational concerns, regulations make serving certain customers risky. The case puts Dimon in a delicate spot as banks begin benefiting from deregulation under Trump appointees.
“There are a lot of misunderstandings here,” Dimon said. “Hopefully the law will change, and hopefully it’ll get sorted out.”
Recall, President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase and its CEO Jamie Dimon, claiming the banking giant debanked him for political reasons.
The lawsuit was filed in January in a Miami state court by his attorney, Alejandro Brito, on behalf of Trump and several of his hospitality companies.
The complaint cites JPMorgan's code of conduct, which reads: "We set high expectations and hold ourselves accountable. We do the right thing—not necessarily the easy or expedient thing. We abide by the letter and spirit of the laws and regulations everywhere we do business and have zero tolerance for unethical behavior."
According to Brito, "Despite claiming to hold these principles dear, JPMC violated them by unilaterally—and without warning or remedy—terminating several of Plaintiff’s bank accounts."
Trump and his companies have "transacted hundreds of millions of dollars" through the bank, the lawsuit reads, adding that Feb. 19, 2021 was the day that "forever altered the dynamic of the parties’ relationship," when the bank allegedly "without warning or provocation," notified Trump and his companies that several of their bank accounts or were beneficiaries of, "would be closed just two months later, on April 19, 2021."
"JPMC did not provide plaintiffs with any recourse, remedy, or alternative—its decision was final and unequivocal," reads the suit.
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 11:30 Close
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:10:00 +0000 More Bark Than Bite: Kaine's War Powers Resolution Is An 'Imminent' Failure
More Bark Than Bite: Kaine's War Powers Resolution Is An 'Imminent' Failure
More Bark Than Bite: Kaine's War Powers Resolution Is An 'Imminent' Failure
Authored by Jonathan Turley,
We now have a glimpse of the War Powers Resolution promised by Sen. Tim Kaine (D., Va.), which is reportedly scheduled for a vote in the Senate today or Wednesday. The resolution purportedly ends all combat operations against Iran … until you reach the very end where there is a hole that you could drive a combat task force through.
I respect members asserting their inherent constitutional authority. I have long criticized the lack of declarations of war as demanded by the Framers. We have not had a formal declaration of war since World War II. However, courts and Congress have long deferred to presidents in the conduct of such operations.
I represented congressional members challenging the Libyan war operation launched by President Barack Obama. Most Democratic members were entirely silent when Obama (and President Joe Biden) exercised such authority against different countries. Notably, the Libyan operation clearly sought regime change without an imminent threat to the United States. Some of those members are now the loudest condemning President Donald Trump in this operation.
This resolution shows how presidents can easily box in Congress once combat operations begin.
The resolution boldly declares “Congress hereby directs the President to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces for hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran or any part of its government or military.”
However, at the very end, the resolution has this line: “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the United States from defending itself from imminent attack.”
As I wrote this week , the problem with such resolutions is that they are effectively meaningless in the context of full combat operations against a nation: “Kaine and others insist that hostilities were not imminent when we attacked. Even if that were true, they are now.”
In these circumstances, it would be nearly impossible to limit the war powers of the President without putting American personnel or allies at risk. After decapitating the leadership in Iran, Iranian assets are clearly operating under prior orders in a decentralized structure. The United States is now seeking to neutralize any assets that it can find in preemptive attacks while trying further to degrade the command structure and military capacity of the Iranian government.
As I wrote earlier:
“The choice now for Democrats is either a senseless or suicidal resolution. It can either resolve to end hostilities as soon as practically possible (an objective already stated by the Administration) or it can actually seek to limit the Administration’s options amid full-fledged war.”
This is the senseless option. All threats from Iran are now “imminent,” and all attacks are arguably preemptive. So what does this actually do?
Here is the resolution: Iran War Powers Resolution
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 11:10 Close
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 15:50:00 +0000 OpenAI Rewrites 'Sloppy' Pentagon AI Deal After Backlash Over Surveillance Risks
OpenAI Rewrites 'Sloppy' Pentagon AI Deal After Backlash Over Surveillance Risks
OpenAI - which millions of users trust with everything from legal documents to tax returns - is revising its newly signed cont
Read more.....
OpenAI Rewrites 'Sloppy' Pentagon AI Deal After Backlash Over Surveillance Risks
OpenAI - which millions of users trust with everything from legal documents to tax returns - is revising its newly signed contract with the US Department of War , just days after it was announced that they would replace Anthropic for use in government systems because the rushed rollout "looked opportunistic and sloppy."
Hours after negotiations collapsed between the Pentagon and rival startup Anthropic on Friday, the San Francisco-based company agreed to supply its AI models for use in classified military operations. The breakdown followed talks with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over how the government could deploy advanced AI tools.
OpenAI initially described its agreement as containing "more guardrails than any previous agreement for classified AI deployments, including Anthropic’s." But on Monday, CEO Sam Altman said the company was working with the department to add explicit contractual language barring the intentional use of its systems for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons or nationals.
"The AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of US persons and nationals ," Altman said the revised terms would state, adding that intelligence agencies such as the National Security Agency would be excluded from the deal for now.
So - while OpenAI has likely bought some legal cover with these changes, there's always the possibility of unintentional use .
From a Monday update to OpenAI's statement on the deal:
Throughout our discussions, the Department made clear it shares our commitment to ensuring our tools will not be used for domestic surveillance. To make our principles as clear as possible, we worked together to add additional language to our agreement.
This language makes explicit that our tools will not be used to conduct domestic surveillance of U.S. persons , including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information. The Department also affirmed that our services will not be used by Department of War intelligence agencies like the NSA . Any services to those agencies would require a new agreement.
The new language reads:
Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals.
For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information.
The Department of War plans to convene a working group made up of leaders from the frontier AI labs, cloud providers, and the Department’s policy and operational communities. OpenAI will participate and expect this will be an important forum for ongoing dialogue on emerging AI capabilities, privacy, and national security challenges going forward.
These updates build on the framework we announced last week and we hope will help create a pathway for other labs to work with the Department going forward.
* * *
Guardrails, Technical Controls and Legal Debate
OpenAI says it can uphold its own red lines through a mix of contractual provisions and technical controls . The company says it will deploy models via cloud access rather than installing them directly onto military hardware and will keep its personnel involved in the loop. It has reiterated that its technology cannot be used to direct autonomous weapons systems.
Altman suggested the company was comfortable relying in part on existing law. “Anthropic seemed more focused on specific prohibitions in the contract, rather than citing applicable laws, which we felt comfortable with ,” he said Saturday.
But by Monday, he acknowledged concerns about how AI systems could enable large-scale data gathering.
“We shouldn’t have rushed to get this out on Friday . The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication,” Altman wrote in a message to employees reposted on X. “We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy.”
The updated language would “prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance or monitoring of US persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information,” according to the company.
Fallout From Anthropic’s Collapse
The Pentagon’s pivot to OpenAI came after Anthropic’s negotiations unraveled over two core red lines articulated by its CEO, Dario Amodei: no domestic mass surveillance and no use of AI in lethal autonomous weapons systems - and would require the Pentagon to seek approval to use it in the heat of battle.
According to the Financial Times , Hegseth sought language permitting the models for "all lawful use." Anthropic executives argued existing U.S. law could allow mass AI-enabled data collection and pressed for tighter contractual safeguards until new legislation was enacted. Discussions reportedly stalled over terms governing the mass collection of publicly available data.
The Pentagon had signaled openness to revising phrasing that Anthropic viewed as overly broad , and senior figures at the company believed a deal was close. But negotiations ultimately fell apart.
Since then, the Trump administration has moved aggressively against Anthropic. President Donald Trump has directed agencies to phase out the company’s tools. The Treasury Department, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and government-backed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac all announced they would end Anthropic contracts - with full dis-integration to occur within six months. The Pentagon also designated the company a supply chain risk.
Employee Dissent and Public Protest
The deal has triggered unrest inside OpenAI and across the broader tech sector. Employees have voiced concerns internally and on social media, according to people familiar with the matter. Nearly 900 workers at OpenAI and Google signed an open letter urging leadership to refuse government demands for domestic mass surveillance or autonomous killing capabilities.
Over the weekend, chalk graffiti appeared outside OpenAI’s San Francisco office reading “NO TO MASS SURVEILLANCE ” and urging staff to “Do the right thing!”
The controversy has also spilled into the consumer market. Anthropic’s chatbot, Claude, briefly climbed above ChatGPT in Apple’s App Store rankings, according to Sensor Tower data, amid calls online for users to delete ChatGPT.
Miles Brundage, OpenAI’s former head of policy research, publicly criticized the company’s handling of the negotiations, writing that employees’ “default assumption” should be that OpenAI “caved + framed it as not caving,” though he acknowledged the organization is complex and that some staff worked toward what they considered a fair outcome.
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 10:50 Close
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 15:30:00 +0000 Regime Change Will Not Be Easy: Tehran's Goal Is To Survive By Any Means Necessary
Regime Change Will Not Be Easy: Tehran's Goal Is To Survive By Any Means Necessary
By Molly Schwartz, cross-asset macro strategist at Rabobank
My Circus! My Monkeys!
Europe was hit wi
Read more.....
Regime Change Will Not Be Easy: Tehran's Goal Is To Survive By Any Means Necessary
By Molly Schwartz, cross-asset macro strategist at Rabobank
My Circus! My Monkeys!
Europe was hit with the first strike to its energy supply chain after the Russian invasion of Ukraine and had to start diversifying its inflows from elsewhere. Now that Middle Eastern LNG is losing reliability, Europe might have to get involved just to keep the lights on.
While the EU and UK would probably be more than happy to spectate from the proverbial “monitoring chair,” they may not have a choice. TTF prices reached highs of - €48.95/MWh yesterday—the highest since February of 2025- and are up more than 20% today.
QatarEnergy announced that it has ceased production of LNG and associated products due to the recent escalation. Our Energy Strategists, Florence Schmit and Joe DeLaura, note that we could see prices return to 2022 levels should Qatar be taken out of the LNG equation entirely (easily back to €100/MWh). Read more here .
This puts the entire European energy complex at risk and might be just the incentive needed for Europe to get out of the monitoring chair and into the ring.
France24 reports that “France, Germany, UK ready to take ‘defensive action’ against Iran .” As the EU touts commitments to increase defense spending and build up its military capabilities, Rabobank Global Strategist Michael Every has mused, “why have all these war planes sitting on the tarmac not doing anything?”
A little farther south, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is considering its own involvement. Omani foreign minister Badr Albusaidi said on X that “neither the interests of the United States nor the cause of global peace are well served by this. I urge the United States not to get sucked in further. This is not your war.” But the GCC has made it clear that they don’t want it to be their war either. Threats to the economies of the Gulf are not just about energy—this also impacts their budding tourism and hospitality industries as few want to vacation in an active warzone. The UAE and Qatar have reportedly been lobbying allies to end this war as soon as possible.
Meanwhile, in a statement , the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs affirmed “its full solidarity with and unwavering support for the brotherly countries, and its readiness to place all its capabilities at their disposal in support of any measures they may undertake. It also warns of the grave consequence resulting from the continued violation of states’ sovereignty and the principles of international law.” As much as the GCC may want to stay out of it (or, at least as far out of it as they can when their territory is being striked by Iranian drones), the Saudis, at least, are prepared to escalate further.
Trump and Hegseth have not shown any signs of backing down just yet. Early yesterday morning, Hegseth affirmed that “Iran is not a regime change war, but the regime did change,” and that the war will be finished “on America-first conditions.” What those conditions are is still TBD. And the ambiguity of those conditions still leaves us with the question of what constitutes a win.
Hegseth and Rubio would tell you that the aim is the same as last time—to set back Iran’s nuclear proliferation program. But as we saw recently, it doesn’t take Iran very long before they can start to rebuild capacity. The best way to cut off nuclear proliferation is to cut off the head, and that necessitates regime change.
However, as noted in yesterday’s installment, regime change will not be easy. The goal of Tehran is to survive by any means necessary . Even if the regime is rendered a shell of what it once was, but manages to hang on by a thread, then the US has failed. While Trump has announced that this military operation could take weeks and Hegseth rejected the idea that this would be another endless war to echo Iraq and Afghanistan, this may still be a much longer ride than expected.
Yesterday’s stellar performance of USD also exemplified how calls of “Sell America” in recent months were shortsighted. While USD has not been behaving as a safe-haven traditionally would, given the dramatic USD sell-off in H1 2025, we have long argued that this was more about positioning—a repricing of EUR/USD in the aftermath of European announcement of defense spending, and rising USD hedge ratios from foreign investors—than it was a loss of USD’s safe haven status. Indeed, recent price action makes it clear that when the going gets rough, investors still flee to the warm embrace of greenback liquidity.
Still, other US assets have not felt the love. The inflationary risks posed by an extensive war with Iran are at front of mind for investors, especially as analysts keep a watchful eye on the strait of Hormuz. Even though the Fed prefers to look at core inflation, which strips out direct energy costs, energy is an input into everything, including core goods and services. While inflation is already above the 2% target, and the lagged effects of tariffs are starting to put pressure on core goods, the additional price increases posed by turning the major oil exporter of the world into a warzone may put the Fed in a tricky position. US 2 year and 10 year Treasury yields moved in parallel, closing the day up 11bp, which is the greatest single day move since the US-Iranian skirmish last June.
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 10:30 Close
Tue, 03 Mar 2026 15:10:01 +0000 China Panics, Urges Ceasefire To Reopen Strait Of Hormuz As Beijing Is Addicted To Cheap Iranian Crude
China Panics, Urges Ceasefire To Reopen Strait Of Hormuz As Beijing Is Addicted To Cheap Iranian Crude
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said at Tuesday's regular press briefing in Beijing that all parties in the Iran co
Read more.....
China Panics, Urges Ceasefire To Reopen Strait Of Hormuz As Beijing Is Addicted To Cheap Iranian Crude
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said at Tuesday's regular press briefing in Beijing that all parties in the Iran conflict must ensure the safe transit of commercial shipping through the critical maritime energy chokepoint of the Strait of Hormuz.
"China urges all parties to immediately cease military operations, avoid escalating tensions, and safeguard the safety of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz ," spokeswoman Ning said.
We've briefed readers that China is heavily exposed to cheap Iranian crude exports. About 80% of Iran's oil exports - about 1.6 million barrels per day - go to China.
This means Beijing will do everything in its power to preserve this lifeline and remove any blockage in Hormuz.
And this.
Chinese officials have reportedly been pressing Iran not to disrupt tanker traffic, damage Qatari gas exports, or hit major export hubs, according to Bloomberg .
The latest AIS shipping tracking data via Bloomberg shows the Strait of Hormuz remains paralyzed, with Iran's Revolutionary Guards commander threatening fire and destruction to any ship that transits the narrow waterway.
Our latest reporting shows that a day after a reported Iranian drone strike forced Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery offline, there are numerous reports of drone strikes on critical Gulf energy infrastructure on Tuesday morning (read report ).
We highly recommend that readers review a report titled "The Iran Question Is All About China " to better understand that this conflict extends well beyond Iran.
Looking ahead, top U.S. and Chinese trade negotiators are expected to meet in mid-March, according to Bloomberg, ahead of a planned Trump-Xi summit later this month. Trump's moves against Venezuela and now Iran can be viewed as an effort to tighten pressure on two of Beijing's cheap crude supplies before those talks (that's if those talks don't get canceled).
Tyler Durden
Tue, 03/03/2026 - 10:10 Close