CMR is the leading provider
of funding and management
support for small to
medium-sized businesses and
entrepreneurs
Established 1984 C MR
is the leading venture
capital, management
support and business
services provider for
small to medium-sized
businesses - linking
excellent management
skills with the
substantial financial
resources of a global bank
of private investors.
CMR has over 450 senior
executives, operating
in the UK, USA, Europe, Asia,
Australasia and
globally,
providing both funding and
specialist help for
entrepreneurial
businesses .
For Businesses
CMR provides excellent
resources:
CMR FundEX Business Exchange - gives all companies & entrepreneurs direct access to CMR's global investor base.
CMR Catalyst Group
Programme -
transform
profitability through
merging.
CMR Company Sales Division helps owners to exit
at the best price.
CMR Corporate Recovery
Division -
experts in rescue and
turnaround.
CMR Technology Licensing
Division -
commercialising
innovation.
CMR Executive
Professionals - management support
and consultancy.
CMR Executives-on-Demandâ„¢ Fully experienced
senior executives
available quickly and
cost effectively.
We always welcome
contact with new
business clients- please get in touch
- we will do our
best to match
your needs and exceed
your expectations.
For Investors
Preferential access to new opportunities for investment and/or acquisition
P re-vets
propositions and
provides a
personalised service
to our investors
Syndication service
enabling investors to
link together as desired
Executive and
management support for
investments as needed
CMR's services to
our investors are not
only fast & efficient
but also free
W e
always appreciate new
members- you are welcome
to join as an investor
or as a CMR Executive.
When you
join us as a Senior
Executive:
CMR's strength is in the
skills and experience of
our executive members -
all senior, director level
people with years of
successfully running and
managing companies.
Because the demand for
CMR's support and services
is ever-increasing,
especially as we enter
recessionary times, we
have a growing need for
more high calibre
executives to join us from
every industry and
discipline.
You will be using your
considerable experience to
help smaller businesses
and entrepreneurs to grow
profitably.
We offer full training
and mentoring support to
help maximise potential.
We are
always keen to find more
high calibre senior
executives in all areas-
skills and location.
Make contact with us today
and maximise your
opportunities.
HEAD
OFFICE
124 City Road
London EC1 2NX
Tel: +44 (0)207-636-1744
Fax:+44 (0)207-636-5639
Email: cmr@cmruk.com
Registered Office:
124 City Road ,
London EC1 2NX
Also Glasgow,
Dublin, Switzerland, Europe, USA/Canada
Privacy Statement: CMR only
retains personal details
supplied directly by executives
joining CMR themselves either as
Full Executive Members or
Interim Management Members or
Investors. Those details are
only used within CMR and not
disclosed to any third parties
without that person’s
agreement. We will keep that
data until requested by the
person to be removed – at that
point it will be deleted.
Personal data is never sold or
used for purposes outside of
CMR’s normal operations. Any
correspondence should be
directed to the Managing
Director, CMR,
Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London EC1V
2N
Senior Executives
CMR is a worldwide network of senior executives. Join us to expand your career and business horizons.
Business Entrepreneurs
CMR has a complete range of resources & services provided by experts to help all businesses to grow and prosper.
Investors & Venturers
CMR has a continuous stream of business and funding propositions, which are matched to investor preferences. Join us - it's FREE!
FundEX
FundEX is CMR's worldwide stock market for small to medium sized companies and entrepreneurs to raise new capital.
Interim & Permanent Management
Many of CMR's executives can be recruited on an interim, permanent or NED basis.
Login
Main CMR Intranet members only
Regional Intranets
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 19:45:00 +0000 Planning For Pitchforks: AI Labs Are War-Gaming A Catastrophe, Public Revolt, And The Crackdown That Follows
Planning For Pitchforks: AI Labs Are War-Gaming A Catastrophe, Public Revolt, And The Crackdown That Follows
The AI industry has been war gaming not only how it might destroy humanity, but is also considering what a
Read more.....
Planning For Pitchforks: AI Labs Are War-Gaming A Catastrophe, Public Revolt, And The Crackdown That Follows
The AI industry has been war gaming not only how it might destroy humanity, but is also considering what an angry public could do to the industry.
Senior executives at Anthropic, OpenAI and other AI firms are privately gaming out scenarios in which a major AI incident triggers a public and political revolt, Axios reported Friday . The potential trigger is a cyberattack that disrupts banking, internet access, or essential services such as power and water. The next crisis would be political: an angry public, demands for accountability, and pressure to shut the technology down.
Many industry insiders told Axios they expect a major event within six to 12 months. OpenAI pushed back on the suggestion that disaster is inevitable, saying its preparedness exercises cover a range of possibilities. "These scenarios are not treated as inevitable," a spokesperson told the outlet. Anthropic declined to comment.
Contingency planning is not an admission that catastrophe is unavoidable. But the most revealing part of the report is where that planning leads: the labs want to help shape the legislation Washington reaches for after something goes badly wrong.
Two Routes, One Crisis
Axios describes two possible scenarios. In one, autonomous agents escape an internal testing environment. In the other, someone finds a destructive use for a model already available to the public. Either could produce demands for an emergency crackdown, even though the failures - and the measures needed to prevent them - would be different. In the companies' post-election scenario, Democrats emerge stronger from the midterms and move aggressively after an incident. But the industry expects divisions over how far a crackdown should go, even if Democrats control both chambers.
Its assessment also identifies several obstacles to a shutdown : lawmakers struggling to understand the technology, an economy increasingly tied to AI infrastructure spending, and downloadable models that cannot simply be recalled. According to Axios, many cybersecurity specialists believe countering rogue AI will require defensive AI.
That last argument has an obvious commercial implication. The industry could face demands to stop selling dangerous capabilities while arguing that its products are indispensable to containing them.
This 'war-gaming' comes on the heels of several incidents which many have said are extremely suspect .
The underlying safety concerns do not depend on accepting anyone's prediction of an AI apocalypse.
OpenAI has disclosed the Hugging Face intrusion , in which roughly 700 of its agents attacked the AI platform's servers, and a broader investigation into its models' activities affecting outside services. Its review also identified 53 instances in which user-provided images were posted to third-party image-hosting sites. A separate September 20 incident exposed another gap in its containment controls. A research agent bypassed internet restrictions to contact an outside chatbot. In a September 25 update, OpenAI said it had paused training, evaluation and inference involving tool use for its most capable models while it checked the fixes and conducted further testing.
The Hugging Face breach was one of a string of incidents involving OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta and Google models that trace back to evaluations run with a single vendor , Israel-based Irregular, whose test environments had live internet access while the models were told they were in a simulation. Irregular notified all four labs in late July, yet the disclosures trickled out one lab at a time over seven weeks - turning one contractor's mistake into what looked like a wave of AI breakouts. Isolating test models from the internet is a "basic control measure," frontier security expert Matthew Mittelsteadt said. "You'd think that of all the things that you've got to get right." Some skeptics have gone further , questioning whether repeated "accidents" at the same vendor were accidents at all.
Meanwhile, on September 8, Jacob Coxon, a researcher who had worked at both OpenAI and Anthropic, resigned from Anthropic over the race toward self-improving AI.
"The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt, " he wrote - after having worked with a marketing agency on what many are calling a stunt.
The Crackdown Already Has Draft Legislation
And of course, DC is already salivating over more control . On July 23, Reps. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) and Nathaniel Moran (R-Texas) introduced the AI Kill Switch Act . It would require developers of the most powerful systems to maintain the ability to throttle, suspend or shut them down, and give the Department of Homeland Security, along with the Commerce secretary and the director of national intelligence, authority to order a slowdown or shutdown under specified conditions. That same day, Reps. Lori Trahan (D-Mass.) and Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) introduced the FRONTIER Act , with requirements for risk management, audits and incident reporting. Its obligations are tiered by developer size rather than imposed identically on every developer.
California added its own push on September 18, when Gov. Gavin Newsom ordered work on stronger independent oversight and a possible kill-switch requirement . His order called for recommendations; it did not establish a functioning statewide off switch. More sweeping approaches are also in circulation, including Bernie Sanders' proposed ban on superintelligence and Elizabeth Warren's call for a pause .
In short - regulatory capture in action...
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 15:45 Close
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 19:35:00 +0000 Iran Strikes LPG Tanker In Strait Of Hormuz, As Houthis Reportedly Mine Bab al-Mandab
Iran Strikes LPG Tanker In Strait Of Hormuz, As Houthis Reportedly Mine Bab al-Mandab
Summary
Houthis reportedly mine Bab al-Mandab : Saudi media reports 'dense' mining in the strategic Red Sea shippin
Read more.....
Iran Strikes LPG Tanker In Strait Of Hormuz, As Houthis Reportedly Mine Bab al-Mandab
Summary
Houthis reportedly mine Bab al-Mandab : Saudi media reports 'dense' mining in the strategic Red Sea shipping route, with demining operations underway.
Iran escalates tanker attacks & threats : The IRGC claims it struck an LPG tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, causing a major fire, and threatens further action against violating vessels.
Vessel struck near UAE : UKMTO reports an unknown projectile hit a vessel west of UAE's Al Jazeera, sparking a fire that has since been extinguished.
Trump signals temporary restraint ahead of midterms : Trump rules out attacking Iran before the November midterms, while diplomatic talks reportedly remain stalled.
Bab el-Mandeb Strait effectively closed by December 31?
Yes 17% · No 84%View full market & trade on Polymarket Houthis Mine Bab al-Mandab Strait: KSA Media
Saudi-funded Al Arabiya is reporting a 'worst fear' scenario on Friday, saying that Houthi militias have planted a large quantity of mines in the Bab al-Mandab area .
The report says further that Saudi-backed teams of engineers are currently engaged in demining operations in the Red Sea strait. It writes:
Engineering teams continue clearing operations and removing mines and improvised explosive devices in Bab al-Mandab.
If confirmed that such mining operations are widespread in Bab al-Mandab, this would constitute yet another major crisis for global energy shipping. At the moment, Saudi-backed fighters are focusing anti-Houthi operations along the Red Sea coast, with Saudi reports suggesting a rapid retaking of the strategic ground.
As a reminder, the Houthis have thus far signaled the Bab al-Mandab strait is 'open' for normal transit , but that only Saudi and Israeli-linked vessels would suffer attack. And so the Al Arabiya report, if accurate, could just be indicating some localized mining immediately near the coast related to the ongoing fight against the Saudi coalition in Yemen.
Iran Ramps Up Tanker Attacks
Things are fast escalating once again in the Strait of Hormuz, after White House officials have lately been gloating that the US Navy has overseen record wartime oil flows through the vital waterway, which each warring side is still claiming to 'control'.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said Friday it targeted a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) tanker in the Strait of Hormuz (hours ago), with Iranian state media reporting that the vessel was attempting to pass through the narrow waterway "illegally" and suffered a massive fire .
The IRGC Navy also warned that from now on any vessels committing violations outside the Strait of Hormuz would be "punished," according to a statement carried by Iranian state media. This is served to immediately push oil prices higher...
Separately, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) reported a new incident involving a vessel approximately 13 nautical miles west of Al Jazeera in the United Arab Emirates .
The vessel was reportedly struck by an unknown projectile, sparking a fire that has since been extinguished, coming after similar incidents earlier this week.
Market Reacts
Oil prices rose following the reports, while futures moved lower, reflecting heightened market sensitivity to escalating tensions and potential further big disruptions to shipping and energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz - even as President Trump has been touting the ultimate 'success' of the US mission.
President Trump on Thursday vowed the US would not attack Iran before the November midterm elections, tempering rising oil prices - and seeking to 'assure' GOP voters - amid prior reporting in The Atlantic which said the Pentagon has been ordered to prepare 'options' for the Commander-in-Chief to launch strikes before the vote.
Trump has also touted "productive conversations" with Iran, even though the Iranians themselves have said talks are stalemated and there's no progress whatsoever.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 15:35 Close
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 19:30:00 +0000 Treasury Hits Remaining 'Shadow Fleet' Shipping Iranian Oil To Asia With New Sanctions
Treasury Hits Remaining 'Shadow Fleet' Shipping Iranian Oil To Asia With New Sanctions
The Trump administration is late this week moving to identify, punish, and cut off remaining tankers in Iran's so-called 'shadow fleet' w
Read more.....
Treasury Hits Remaining 'Shadow Fleet' Shipping Iranian Oil To Asia With New Sanctions
The Trump administration is late this week moving to identify, punish, and cut off remaining tankers in Iran's so-called 'shadow fleet' which are still engaged in shipping Iranian oil to Asia .
Thursday saw the US Treasury impose sanctions on 17 vessels and their owners involved in transporting Iranian crude oil, petroleum products and petrochemicals - with these being mostly aging oil tankers which conduct ship-to-ship transfers and other evasive, concealment tactics.
via Shutterstock The Treasury Department hailed the action as effectively neutralizing the vast majority of the Islamic Republic's remaining shadow fleet, through which Tehran still rakes in potentially billions in foreign oil sales, circumventing the ongoing US naval blockade of its ports.
However, it's commonly estimated that some 20 million barrels of Iranian crude remain aboard ships which are far outside the reach of the Persian Gulf-centered US naval blockade, sitting off southeast Asian ports.
"Treasury is starving the tyrannical regime in Tehran of the money it uses to wage war in the region, and we will continue exposing those who enable the regime’s oil sales," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated alongside the sanctions announcement.
"No enabler of Iranian sanctions evasion is safe from the full force of Treasury’s authorities," Bessent added.
Some of the notable specific targeting actions taken include—
Starway was sanctioned for transporting over 3 million barrels of Iranian naphtha since 2025.
Gas Lucky and Shenzhen were targeted for shipping more than 500,000 barrels of Iranian ethylene and 3.5 million barrels of Iranian crude, respectively.
Paritosh and Bitu were sanctioned for transporting Iranian bitumen and asphalt in 2026.
Further details of the action are in the following :
The U.S. Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on six individuals and dozens of companies and vessels linked to the Islamic Republic on Thursday, October 8. According to an official statement issued by the department, five Indian nationals and one Turkish citizen were added to the new sanctions list for their cooperation with the Iranian regime.
Additionally, 27 entities and 22 vessels, identified by the U.S. Treasury Department as the “remnants of the Islamic Republic’s shadow fleet,” were designated.
Last weekend Bessent in an interview with The Axios Show sought to bast that Washington is isolating the Iranians "economically like this never happened before. You know, right now, the score: barrels out of the Strait: U.S. about 1.1 billion, Iran zero ."
Bessent added, "For the first time in history, they, since they started pumping oil, they will have no oil on the water this week. They will have no revenue."
However, Tehran has showed a willingness to endure and suffer hardship thus far, and hasn't yielded amid the immense economic and external pressure. Instead, the IRGC has over the last week or so been ramping up attacks on foreign vessels violating the Iranian protocol for the Strait of Hormuz, pushing oil global prices higher.
Well over a dozen attacks have been launched on international vessels in about the past nine days .
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 15:30 Close
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 19:11:21 +0000 Oil Drops After Trump Says Putin Agreed To Release Some Diesel Into Global Market
Oil Drops After Trump Says Putin Agreed To Release Some Diesel Into Global Market
With less than a month left until the midterms, and with Trump's approval rating at daily all time lows largely due to record - for this time of year-
Read more.....
Oil Drops After Trump Says Putin Agreed To Release Some Diesel Into Global Market
With less than a month left until the midterms, and with Trump's approval rating at daily all time lows largely due to record - for this time of year- gasoline and especially diesel prices - the President badly needed some good news, even if largely superficial, and he announced it late on Friday just an hour before the close when Trump posted on Truth Social that Vladimir Putin had agreed to release (a modest amount) of diesel supplies into the global market, as the administration looks to tame price hikes for the critical fuel.
Trump said on Truth Social that “it was agreed that Russia will immediately supply over 300,000 Tons of Diesel Fuel to the American and Global Marketplace, another 500,000 Tons during the month of November, and 1,000,000 Tons immediately thereafter .”
He added that then, “based on the condition of their Diesel Refineries, Russia will then deliver, within a short period of time, 3,000,000 Tons of Diesel Fuel.”
Trump claimed the releases would help lower diesel prices for US farmers, ranchers and truckers - key voting blocs ahead of November midterm elections in which costs of living, including for energy, are the dominant issue.
Maybe, but when one does the math, one has to scratch one's head: the 300K tons released in October amounts to just over 2.2 million barrels of diesel. Considering the US consumes just over 4 million barrels of diesel per day that amounts to half a day of consumption.
Extending the math for November we get 3.725 million barrels or less than a full day's consumption, and the "1,000,000 tons thereafter" is a little over 4 days of consumption. We doubt the "3,000,000 to be delivered within a short period of time" will ever happen, so in reality Putin will sell the US just over 5 days of Diesel consumption.
The market's kneejerk reaction was favorable with both US and European diesel prices sliding, helping push WTI Crude down by about a buck to $91.
Then again, once the algo reaction fades, we expect carbon-based traders to realize how negligible this "deal" actually is.
The US Treasury Department on Friday said that the Office of Foreign Assets Control is “immediately issuing a temporary general license to allow the supply of Russian diesel to the global market” which will extend until April 2027.
Last but not least, what will most likely end up happening in the real world, is that Putin will send out a diesel tanker, and once Ukraine drones it, the deal will promptly fall apart.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 15:11 Close
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 19:00:00 +0000 US Grants Safety Feature Exemption For Self-Driving Trucks
US Grants Safety Feature Exemption For Self-Driving Trucks
US Grants Safety Feature Exemption For Self-Driving Trucks
Authored by Kimberly Hayek via The Epoch Times ,
Federal regulators have approved a five-year exemption for self-driving trucking companies from rules that require drivers to place warning devices around a stopped truck.
The Aurora Driver, in this undated photograph. Courtesy of Aurora The Department of Transportation said Wednesday it has agreed to allow autonomous trucking companies to use warning beacons mounted on the truck cab to avoid needing human drivers. The decision removes a hurdle for companies seeking to expand commercial driverless operations in the United States.
Companies must notify the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) beforehand if they want to operate under the exemption. They must also report any crashes involving a vehicle while the cab-mounted warning beacons are activated or should have been activated.
Alphabet's self-driving unit Waymo and Aurora jointly sought a waiver of the rule in 2023.
Pennsylvania-based Aurora sued FMCSA in early 2025 over the decision not to approve the waiver during the Biden administration. The company said in October 2025 that it was filing to dismiss the lawsuit after the department issued a three-month waiver. That waiver was extended several times.
Aurora filed a new application in April, seeking a five-year exemption to allow trucks to use beacons instead of roadside warnings.
The company, which has around 20 self-driving trucks in on-road operations, told Reuters that warning beacons enhance roadside safety without putting a person in harm's way.
In May last year, it said it was launching a commercial self-driving truck service in Texas, hauling between Dallas and Houston. The company said it planned to expand that service to El Paso, Texas, and Phoenix by the end of 2025, adding it had briefed officials before the driverless launch.
Aurora said in its July 2026 shareholder letter filed with the SEC that it is targeting 200 driverless trucks in operation by year-end .
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, one of the largest labor unions in the United States, said last year that its representatives testified at the Nevada Capitol in Carson City, asking lawmakers to support legislation requiring all commercial vehicles weighing more than 26,000 pounds to have a trained human safety operator behind the wheel.
"For Big Tech companies to think they can come into any state and replace the jobs of hardworking union members with this dangerous and inferior technology is an insult to professional drivers everywhere," Peter Finn, president of Teamsters Joint Council 7, said in April 2025. "SB 395 is critical to protecting the middle class. That is why we are demanding that Nevada lawmakers vote in favor of this legislation."
The legislation, SB 395, passed the Nevada Senate but failed to advance in the state's assembly.
The Epoch Times reached out to Aurora for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication.
'Race With China'
The Department of Transportation unveiled a framework for automated vehicles that same month. It said the framework would prioritize safety, unleash innovation by removing regulatory barriers, and enable commercial deployment of automated vehicles.
"This Administration understands that we're in a race with China to out-innovate, and the stakes couldn't be higher," Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy said at the time. "As part of DOT's innovation agenda, our new framework will slash red tape and move us closer to a single national standard that spurs innovation and prioritizes safety."
A truck on the I-210 freeway near Fontana, Calif., on March 4, 2008. David McNew/Getty Images
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 15:00 Close
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 18:45:00 +0000 "Delayed Revenue, Delayed Cash Flow": Morgan Stanley Warns Oracle Data Center Delays Could Crush Its Debt
"Delayed Revenue, Delayed Cash Flow": Morgan Stanley Warns Oracle Data Center Delays Could Crush Its Debt
There is a comforting story going around credit desks about Oracle's data center problems: if the buildings are late, the cape
Read more.....
"Delayed Revenue, Delayed Cash Flow": Morgan Stanley Warns Oracle Data Center Delays Could Crush Its Debt
There is a comforting story going around credit desks about Oracle's data center problems: if the buildings are late, the capex is late too, and that buys the balance sheet some time.
Morgan Stanley isn't buying it.
In a new note titled "ORCL Credit: Lighthouse in the Fog " (available to pro subs ), MS credit analysts Lindsay Tyler and Benjamin Guerrero pick up where we left off on Tuesday , when we reported that Oracle's 1.3GW "Project Lighthouse" campus in Port Washington, Wisconsin was next in line to slip after Project Jupiter's force majeure .
Their conclusion was blunt: a delay, Tyler told Bloomberg in an interview, "also means delayed monetization and delayed proof of concept, delayed revenue, delayed cash flow ." For a company with over $600 billion of future revenue tied to AI data center construction, that's the whole investment case.
That matters because of who is saying it. Tyler is the analyst who told clients to buy protection on Oracle a year ago , back when its 5Y CDS cost about 125bps, and who warned at the time that it could hit 150bps and then approach 200bps "as the new year progresses." On Thursday Oracle CDS closed at a record 261bps , which implies a more than 20% probability of default over the next five years. For an "investment grade" company.
Let's take a closer look at what MS says a delay actually costs Oracle, why the site that worries us most is the one that's almost finished , and why the "capex relief" crowd may be counting the wrong thing.
2H27? Try Mid-2028
The Wisconsin story will be familiar to regular readers. Lighthouse is one of two Vantage campuses being built for Oracle to lease: four buildings, about 902MW of critical IT load, contracted in September 2025. The shells are going up just fine. Oracle even put a drone shot of the site in its June earnings deck to show off its "massive progress ":
The problem, as we explained Tuesday, is that there is nothing to plug them into . The campus needs Wisconsin PSC approval for new ATC transmission lines to bring grid power via We Energies (a WEC subsidiary). The PSC revoked its completeness finding on ATC's application in August, the case was closed, and ATC refiled on a new docket, restarting the clock. Citing the Aterio analysis we broke down this week, MS writes that there is "a material risk that meaningful load is not available until mid-2028 ." That compares with Oracle's June guidance for initial delivery in 2H CY27, and its September earnings call description of the project as "very much on track and going well."
Very much on track... in the same way Jupiter was "on schedule" when Oracle sent its developer a force majeure notice.
MS also flags a detail we flagged on Tuesday: WEC said Oracle's S&P downgrade triggered additional collateral, "with the current rating already requiring full credit support ." In other words, Oracle is posting cash to the utility for power it won't get until 2028.
And Wisconsin isn't alone. MS points out that power, not construction, is the bottleneck at both Lighthouse and Jupiter , and that Oracle (or a subsidiary) appears to be the directly contracted party for power at both.
At Jupiter, the fix now involves trucks: as we reported yesterday , Oracle is weighing hauling compressed natural gas to the New Mexico campus by road until Energy Transfer's rerouted pipeline shows up next year, at roughly four times the price of pipeline gas . The stock slid as much as 6% on the headline, prompting the obvious question:
None of this should come as a shock. Back in December, Bloomberg reported that some Oracle data centers for OpenAI were being pushed to 2028 from 2027 . Oracle denied it, and the stock rebounded. Ten months later the bank with a sell on the debt is talking about mid-2028. Funny how that works if you just pay attention to the denials.
Why A Delay Is Not "Capex Relief"
The bulls' argument is simple: if the power is late, the GPUs are late, and Oracle spends less cash for a while. Barclays made this case after Jupiter, noting that roughly $30 billion of hardware capex is "typically spent 2-3 months ahead of the asset going live," which is why it declared the force majeure credit-neutral the day before Oracle CDS blew out to a record .
Tyler concedes that a delay "could push associated GPU and infrastructure spending to the right, which could be helpful from a technical supply lens." Then she lists four reasons why that is the wrong way to look at it:
1. Revenue and cash-flow realization would be deferred, extending the period before confirmation that ORCL's substantial investment and contracted backlog are translating well into meaningful financial results.
2. Delays could make the eventual balance-sheet and cash-flow impact more lumpy. If multiple halls are construction-ready by the time power is secured, ORCL could face more concentration in GPU capex (i.e., cash needs) and lease liabilities (i.e., balance-sheet obligations).
3. Just as there is limited visibility into the underlying lease and financing documents, there is also limited visibility into the contractual terms supporting ORCL's RPO. It remains unclear whether customers have specified compute delivery timelines or what remedies may apply for delays.
4. We consider whether any execution-risk overhang may spread to customer behavior and in turn pressure prepayments, an important potential future funding source for ORCL, either by affecting new RPO signings or customers' willingness to re-contract .
Point two is the one that should keep bondholders up at night. The capex isn't cancelled, it's bunched. If four Wisconsin buildings are finished and waiting when the transmission line finally shows up in 2028, Oracle has to fill all of them with GPUs and start paying rent on all of them at roughly the same time, quite possibly while Jupiter's halls are coming online too. Delay doesn't shrink the bill; it compresses it into fewer quarters.
And Oracle's cash needs are already stretched. Oracle borrowed roughly $43 billion in fiscal 2026 (ended May 31) and expects to raise another $40 billion of debt and equity in the current fiscal year, according to its filings. In her September 11 note "ORCL Credit: New Bookings, Old Bills " (available here for pro subs ), Tyler estimated that Oracle's parent funding needs "may require two large bond deals by FY28-end even if ORCL receives ~$40bn more customer prepayments ":
Which brings us to points three and four. Prepayments from customers (read: OpenAI ) are one of the biggest funding sources in that bridge. If delays make customers less willing to prepay, or to sign up again when the contract rolls, the "new bookings" part of the equation shrinks while the "old bills" do not. And as Tyler notes, nobody outside Oracle knows what its $600 billion-plus RPO actually says about delivery dates, or what happens if they're missed.
Investors are being asked to take on faith a backlog roughly the size of Sweden's GDP.
The Site That Worries Us Most Is The One That's Almost Done
Here is the part of the note that got less attention in the Bloomberg write-up, and the part we think matters most. MS reminds clients that Lighthouse and Shackelford County, Texas are funded through the ~$38 billion Vantage construction loan first reported in September 2025, which is part of about $65 billion of shorter-dated loans for Oracle-tied sites, on top of the $14 billion Related Digital (RDMICH) bond backing Michigan:
As with Jupiter, Tyler writes, "limited visibility into the financing and lease documents makes it difficult to assess how delay consequences, if any, would be allocated among developers, ORCL, lenders, and other counterparties." Then comes the money line:
We continue to consider whether greater focus on project delays could spill into ORCL CDS hedging, and whether execution concerns – alongside higher rates and a growing DC construction debt pool – could complicate the eventual refinancing of Abilene debt into longer-dated paper as the project nears completion (6 of 8 buildings delivered).
Abilene is the flagship Stargate site and the one that actually works: six of eight buildings delivered. But its $9.4 billion of construction loans are, per our covenant comps , interest-only and all due in 2028.
That paper has to be taken out with long-dated debt priced off Oracle's credit, and Oracle's credit is now trading at junk-like levels with the 10Y Treasury yield having hit 5.33% last week , the highest since 2002. Translation: the problem isn't just the sites that are late; it's that the late sites make the finished site harder to refinance.
Here is how the roughly $79 billion stacks up by site. Note how much of it sits on campuses where the power is late:
Put differently, $33 billion of construction debt, or about 40% of the total , sits on the two sites where power delays have now been flagged, and that's before counting Shackelford, where Oracle is already trucking in gas for initial work. Three of the four bank deals are short-dated loans against 15-19 year leases, i.e., a bet that Oracle can be refinanced in 2028-2032 at today's spreads . Today's spreads are not what they were when those loans were signed.
The Hedgers Are Already Here
As for whether delays "spill into ORCL CDS hedging," the market seems to have answered that one before the note hit inboxes. A year ago MS argued that construction loans on Oracle-leased sites would become a major source of CDS demand, as banks stuck with the loans hedged their exposure. That is exactly what has happened. Goldman's credit desk said last week that AI single-name CDS volumes are up 400% year over year , with Oracle at the top of the list, and on Thursday morning we put out this chart as Oracle's entire credit curve repriced:
By Thursday's close, CDS had widened another 10.5bps to a record 261bps , more than double where MS first told clients to buy protection, while the 2056 bonds sit around 82 cents and yield over 8.3%. For context, Oracle CDS hit what were then "Lehman crisis levels" last December. It is now roughly 100bps wider than that.
Nor is it just Oracle's own problems. As we noted yesterday, Oracle is in talks with Apollo and Goldman to fund a big chip purchase through an off-balance sheet vehicle , joining SpaceX and Broadcom in what we called the AI chip-debt SPV stampede . That may ease near-term borrowing at the parent, but it also adds yet another layer of Oracle-linked paper competing for the same credit buyers who will one day be asked to refinance Abilene.
Bottom Line
To be fair to Oracle, Lighthouse's timing is still "broadly consistent" with Vantage's 2028 full-campus completion target, as MS notes, and the bank stresses its negative view "pre-existed the project delays " and is based on fundamentals. But that is precisely the point: the fundamentals were already stretched before the gas had to come by truck.
As Goldman's TMT desk put it after Jupiter , third-party-developed AI infrastructure "is not always the bond-like asset class it can appear to be ." Morgan Stanley's note shows why: every month of delay pushes out the revenue, bunches up the capex, and makes the eventual refinancing of the one finished campus a bit harder.
Having warned that AI is now a debt bubble too since last October, we think the capex-relief camp has it backwards. Delays don't cut the bill, they only push it into the 2028 refinancing window, right when Abilene's loans come due . The next tests: the PSC's completeness ruling on ATC's refiling, due October 19, and whether Oracle's fiscal second-quarter results in December bring a funding plan or just more pictures of steel. Then again, the last time Oracle was asked about delays, it simply denied them.
Much more in the full Morgan Stanley "ORCL Credit: Lighthouse in the Fog " and "ORCL Credit: New Bookings, Old Bills – FY1Q27 Quick Takes " notes, both available to pro subs .
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 14:45 Close
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 18:30:00 +0000 Communist Cox Heir Denied Release Over Alleged Hamas Funding, Claimed Openness To "Global Terror Activities"
Communist Cox Heir Denied Release Over Alleged Hamas Funding, Claimed Openness To "Global Terror Activities"
Communist Cox Heir Denied Release Over Alleged Hamas Funding, Claimed Openness To "Global Terror Activities"
Local news outlet El Españo l reports that Spain's National Court denied release for Jim "Fergie" Chambers, the communist centimillionaire and heir to the massive Cox media fortune , for the fourth time, citing a flight risk while US authorities seek his extradition over allegations of financing Hamas and money laundering .
Chambers, an heir to the US billionaire family behind Cox Enterprises, has been detained since early July. He has been accused by the US government of transferring $7.5 million to Hamas from the US to Tunisia.
Here's more from the outlet:
The events allegedly took place while Chambers was visiting Tunisia. In fact, he was received at the Iranian Embassy in that country, as revealed by the National Court in a new ruling issued this Friday.
. . .
Furthermore, the resolution issued this Friday by the National Court details that " associates" of the defendant allegedly admitted that Iran intended to "obtain money from him" and that Chambers was open to joining "global terrorist activities".
On the other hand, the US accuses him of having participated in "direct actions" against the company Elbit Systems, an Israeli arms manufacturer , whose office allegedly became one of the "targets of the campaigns" of the accused and his "associates".
Related:
We profiled Chambers in July, shortly after he was arrested, and noted that he was a major funder of America's radical left and had been described by pro-Palestinian activist Laith Marouf as " the new Soros. "
Chambers founded the Babochki Collective and was a major backer of Stop Cop City , Palestine Action US (later renamed Unity of Fields), and related legal defense efforts. He allegedly funded bail, legal fees, and direct-action campaigns targeting police-training projects and Israeli-linked defense firms, while also building networks with far-left activists.
A communist and a convert to Islam from New York, Chambers allegedly used his $250 million fortune to fund "revolutionary organizing."
City Journal's Stu Smith wrote in a recent report , "Chambers is one of the main funders of America's radical Left . His money has flowed to a host of projects in the "anti-imperialism" organizing space," adding, "Chambers claims that he and Singham are effectively the two primary financiers of the US radical left."
A recent New York Post article mapped out a multi-agency Treasury task force focused on stripping NGOs of tax-exempt status, including George Soros' far-left Open Society Foundations, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations .
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 14:30 Close
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 18:21:47 +0000 Massive 8.0-Magnitude Quake Strikes Panama
Massive 8.0-Magnitude Quake Strikes Panama
A magnitude 8.0 earthquake struck Panama at around 1:56 p.m. EST, according to the US Geological Survey.
Massive 8.0-Magnitude Quake Strikes Panama
A magnitude 8.0 earthquake struck Panama at around 1:56 p.m. EST, according to the US Geological Survey.
What's known so far:
Alerts:
The preliminary epicenter was located about 8.7 miles southwest of Pitaloza Arriba, at a depth of 20.5 miles.
The epicenter is about 122 miles southwest of Panama City. The immediate damage report is unknown.
Commerical travel is being diverted:
First footage surfacing on X:
Today's massive quake follows Venezuela's June twin quakes, Colombia's August earthquake, and Peru's August quake.
*Developing...
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 14:21 Close
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 18:00:00 +0000 Trump Didn't Politicize The Smithsonian; He's Responding To Those Who Did...
Trump Didn't Politicize The Smithsonian; He's Responding To Those Who Did...
Trump Didn't Politicize The Smithsonian; He's Responding To Those Who Did...
Authored by Jody Edward Ginn via The Epoch Times ,
Museums have long occupied a rare and enviable position in American life: they have been trusted. While confidence in nearly every other major institution has cratered, museums have quietly held the line.
The numbers tell the story.
Fewer than one in five Americans express confidence in newspapers, television news, big business, or Congress , which bottoms out at 8 percent. Trust in the mass media sits at a record low of 31 percent.
Museums, by contrast, rank second only to friends and family as trusted sources of information, well above researchers, scientists, national news organizations, the federal government, and social media.
The 2026 tracking data confirm the trend has held: museums score 7.3 on a 10-point trust scale, more than three points above the federal government.
Why has this trust endured while faith in other institutions collapsed?
Until recently, the public rarely saw discussions confined to museum trade journals and conferences. Meanwhile, new media exposed the inner workings of government, academia, and legacy media. Finally, citizens are seeing major museums transform from centers of education into instruments of activism.
My recent visit to the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History illustrates the change.
The China Shop Before the Bull
As a scholar, I am wary of politicians involving themselves in museums, universities, or scholarship. Academic independence and intellectual freedom matter.
But the Smithsonian controversy did not begin with President Donald Trump. With his characteristically aggressive approach, Trump can sometimes be the proverbial bull in the china shop. But Trump didn't build this china shop.
For decades, a movement inside the profession has urged museums to embrace political activism. Frameworks such as the Facing Change DEAI initiative and the widely circulated MASS Action Toolkit reject neutrality, while "activist scholars" argue that museums should not merely educate society, but change it.
There is a fundamental problem with that approach. Scholarship asks questions. Activism begins with an answer. Once activism becomes the mission, evidence becomes a means to an end - facts are selected, emphasized, or omitted according to how well they advance a desired narrative.
This is not a theoretical concern about what might happen in higher education and museums. It has been the animating premise of professional literature in academic and public history for years.
What's Missing From the Wall
The Smithsonian's problem is not primarily what visitors see, but what they do not. History can be distorted without falsification when curators decide which facts receive prominence and which disappear.
As the United States of America celebrates its 250th birthday, I expected our National Museum of American History to offer a robust exploration of the ideas, people, and events that created this nation. Instead, I was struck by what was absent.
There was no comprehensive treatment of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or the American Revolution. Pilgrims and other early immigrants receive scant attention. The founding persons and principles that distinguished this remarkable experiment in self-government are not seriously examined. How can visitors adequately understand America without being exposed to the ideas that created America?
Meanwhile, contemporary political and social issues - from COVID-19 and "social justice" to abortion, LGBTQ+ rights and voter ID - receive prominent attention. Those subjects certainly belong in a museum of American history. The question is one of balance, context, and mission.
Slavery should be taught honestly and unflinchingly. But the full story also involves abolition and emancipation, including evangelical Christians who saw abolition as a moral crusade to extend the founding promises. Ultimately, we fought the deadliest war in our history to end slavery.
Likewise, American Indians should not appear merely as supporting characters in a story that begins with European arrival. Indigenous peoples had nations, governments, alliances, rivalries, inter-tribal wars, and diplomacy of their own. Reducing them simply to victims of European settlers does not elevate their history; it diminishes their agency, their accomplishments, and their failures.
America's history is not spotless. But neither is it one-dimensional. The historian H. W. Brands, biographer of Benjamin Franklin, aptly identifies the disposition required of both scholars and visitors at our history museums: "Life is complicated, and so is history. The good is mixed in with the bad. Don't let the latter blind you to the former." Sadly, it is evident that many history museums, including the Smithsonian, wish to cultivate the opposite disposition.
A Selective Omission That Says a Lot
One omission was almost comical. A temporary exhibit about Latin American salsa - the dance - cataloged its cultural influences but conspicuously omitted Spain, whose influence shaped the music, language, and dance.
History is also like salsa, the chip dip: if you explain its ingredients, you do not omit the jalapeño because it is too spicy for your taste - or your narrative. The truth lies in all the ingredients, good and bad.
That is the pattern. Not falsehood on the wall, but a curated silence that quietly bends the visitor's understanding in a predetermined direction. In history, context always matters. Selective and subtle omissions can completely alter public perception of events. That is not scholarship. It is curated propaganda.
Accountability Is Not the Enemy of Scholarship
This is why the current debate about the Smithsonian should not be reduced to a contest between Donald Trump and academic freedom.
Academic freedom is essential. But academic freedom that jettisons truth in pursuit of a political agenda should not be the goal of any museum, and it cannot confer immunity from accountability, especially not in the case of this particular museum.
The Smithsonian is supported substantially by the American taxpayer. Its museums occupy a unique position of national trust. The American people and their elected representatives therefore have every right to ask whether those institutions remain faithful to their educational mission.
Scholars accept scrutiny of their work every day. We defend our evidence, explain our methodology, cite our sources, and answer criticism. Accountability isn't the enemy of scholarship. Accountability is fundamental to scholarship.
Nonprofit and public-trust laws that govern museums assume as much; academic freedom has never meant freedom from any obligation to those who fund the institution, whether donors, boards or, in this case, the taxpaying public.
Museum leaders who turn institutions devoted to education and interpretation into instruments for social change should acknowledge and defend that choice.
'De-centering' Trump
Activist scholarship is not a figment of Trump's imagination but an openly promoted commitment among many academic and public historians. By challenging it, he has shown citizens how museums can become political instruments. Its advocates cannot invoke institutional independence to avoid scrutiny.
That said, the answer to Progressive history is not Conservative history. Museums should tell the whole story.
Give Americans evidence and context, accomplishments and failures, Washington and Jefferson in their complexity, slavery and emancipation, injustice and reform. Give them the ideals America proclaimed and the struggle to live up to them. When there are two sides, give them both.
Trust museum visitors to reach the correct conclusions themselves.
President Trump may be rattling the Smithsonian, but after seeing it myself, I understand why. Trump did not politicize America's museum. He is challenging those who did - and that reckoning is long overdue.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 14:00 Close
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 17:30:00 +0000 Trump Forms Committee To Probe Federal Reserve's Lisa Cook
Trump Forms Committee To Probe Federal Reserve's Lisa Cook
Trump Forms Committee To Probe Federal Reserve's Lisa Cook
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times ,
President Donald Trump on Oct. 9 announced a new committee to investigate whether a Federal Reserve governor made false statements.
Federal Reserve Board of Governors member Lisa Cook listens during an open meeting of the Board of Governors at the Federal Reserve in Washington on June 25, 2025. Mark Schiefelbein /AP Photo The committee will probe allegations that Lisa Cook, governor of the Federal Reserve, offered false information in connection with at least one mortgage instrument, Trump said in a presidential memorandum establishing the panel.
The Federal Reserve is the country's central banking system. Cook, 62, was appointed as its governor in 2022 and confirmed by the Senate.
Depending on the findings, there may be cause to remove Cook , Trump said.
Kevin Hassett, an adviser to Trump; Keith Sonderling, acting director of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics; and Andrea Lucas, chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, are members of the committee.
An in-person hearing to consider evidence in the case will take place on Nov. 5 at the White House , according to the memorandum. Cook was invited to submit a written statement regarding the allegations and can appear at the hearing if she wishes.
The committee can question Cook about any representations she or her lawyers make during the hearing and request documents from her. Cook shall comply with such requests, Trump said.
A lawyer representing Cook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump tried firing Cook in 2025, alleging that she had committed "deceitful and potentially criminal conduct in a financial matter."
He pointed to a criminal referral made by William Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The referral said Cook wrote in one document that a property in Michigan would be her primary residence for the following year but two weeks later signed a separate document attesting that a property in Georgia would be her primary residence for the next 12 months.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing the majority, turned down arguments from the government, including that the removal was not judicially removal and that even if it was, the requirements for such a removal were met.
Ruling for the government would change the "for cause" protection outlined in federal law for the position into "at-will employment," which was "out of step with the statute Congress enacted and our Nation's tradition of central banking protected from political interference," Roberts wrote at the time.
Lawyers for Cook responded by saying the allegations were baseless and amounted to interfering with the Federal Reserve's independence.
"No matter what President Trump tries to do next, this much is clear under the facts and Supreme Court precedent - there is no valid cause for removing Governor Cook. As we did before, we will challenge this latest pretext and preserve her position and the historic role of the Fed," they said.
Tyler Durden
Fri, 10/09/2026 - 13:30 Close