CMR is the leading provider of funding and management support for small to medium-sized businesses and entrepreneurs 

As the tempo of AI newsflow approached the frenzied rollercoaster pace of geopolitical headlines during the biggest oil shock in decades, it's becoming easy to get lost in all the latest developments and drama surrounding OpenAI, Anthropic, Nvidia, government blacklists, the AI circle jerk, sentinent killer robots, and so on...

To help readers keep on top of things, we are launching a brief AI news roundup, which should help you get up to speed in under 60 seconds. 

Here are the four main things you need to know: 

• And just like that, Anthropic goes from Pentagon supply chain risk to $13B anchor tenant of AWS: Amazon’s fresh $5B investment brings its total Anthropic commitment to $13B – with Anthropic pledging $100B+ in AWS cloud spend over 10 years in return, securing 5GW of compute capacity across Tranium2 through Tranium4. On the government track, NSA is reportedly deploying Anthropic’s Mythos model despite the DoD designation – a contradiction that speaks to how deeply embedded Claude has become in mission critical workflows. And perhaps the clearest signal of where employees think this is going: Anthropic’s recent tender offer fell short of the $5-6B investors had lined up – not because demand was weak, but employees choosing to hold, perhaps betting the public listing will price meaningfully higher.
   
• OpenAI, meanwhile, is cutting… not expanding. Kevin Weil and Bill Peebles both departed as OpenAI pivots away from compute heavy side quests towards enterprise monetization and a forthcoming superapp. The Codex revamp signals the same thesis: agentic workflow ownership over model novelty. Both companies are refining narrative and product surface, and capital structure simultaneously – the ARR accounting dispute where OpenAI internally accused Anthropic of overstating revenue metrics signals the positioning war is intensifying.
   
• But the most consequential bet of the week may not be in software at all. Jeff Bezos is close to finalizing a $10B funding round for Project Prometheus – his physical AI lab valued at $28B, with JPM and Blackrock among investors per the Financial Times. While Anthropic and OpenAI race to own the enterprise workflow layer, Bezos is making a different wager: that the next frontier of AI Value Creation is in the physical world – manufacturing, aerospace, robotics, logistics – where the training data isn’t scraped from the internet but locked inside the factory floor. Not to mention, this is the first time Bezos has held an operational role since leaving Amazon in 2021.
   
• And zooming out, the Private Capital machine isn’t slowing. Sequoia raised $7B under new co-stewards Alfred Lin and Pat Grady, nearly double its prior $3.4B comparable fund – for late stage AI expansion. Accel followed with $5B, deploying $4B into a Leaders Fund targeting at least 20 checks averaging $200M each, explicitly naming robotics and defense alongside AI software. Taken together: $12B+ of late stage conviction in a single week, with physical AI now sitting at the center of both mandates. With Capital is concentrating, Manger Selection now matters more than vintage year timing.

Source: UBS

Latest: 

• Warsh labeled the Fed’s 2021-2022 response a “fatal policy error” on inflation.
• He demands a new policy framework, tools, and major communications reform.
• Warsh rejects forward guidance and refuses to preview future rate moves.
• Price stability exists when no one talks about inflation, Warsh testified.
• Warsh disputes that tariffs caused the recent inflation overshoot.
• Inflation data used by the Fed is “quite imperfect,” per Warsh.
• He focuses most on the underlying inflation rate.
• Trump never asked Warsh to commit to specific interest-rate cuts.
• Sen. Tillis blocks Warsh’s nomination until the DOJ drops the Powell probe.

During his live Senate Banking Committee confirmation hearing on Tuesday, Federal Reserve chair nominee Kevin Warsh criticized past Fed mistakes, called for a “reform-oriented” central bank, pledged strict independence from President Trump, highlighted AI as “the most disruptive moment in modern economic history,” and faced Democratic scrutiny over his $131–209 million in assets (which he agreed to divest, including stakes tied to Stanley Druckenmiller’s Juggernaut Fund) while dodging a direct answer on whether Trump lost the 2020 election.

Warsh demanded a new policy framework, new tools, and major communications reform, including scrapping problematic forward guidance and the dot plot - stating he won’t preview future rate decisions.

VAN HOLLEN: If the central bank were to cut rates, that would typically push prices up, right?

WARSH: Unlike many of my colleagues, I don't believe I should be previewing what a future decision might be

VAN HOLLEN: I'm not asking you that. Most economists would agree that would… pic.twitter.com/IBE2G4yjsQ

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 21, 2026

He defined price stability as inflation so tame “that no one is talking about it” across boardrooms or kitchen tables.

WARSH: My preferred definition of stable prices is a little different than most academics. I believe price stability should be a change in prices such that no one’s talking about it. The sooner we can reform the institution, if confirmed, the sooner we can ensure price stability. pic.twitter.com/Bk8RQCxcZG

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 21, 2026

Warsh disputes that tariffs caused the recent inflation overshoot.

*WARSH: DON'T AGREE THAT INFLATION OVERSHOOT IS DUE TO TARIFFS

*WARSH: DATA BEING USED TO JUDGE INFLATION IS QUITE IMPERFECT

*WARSH: I'M MOST INTERESTED IN UNDERLYING INFLATION RATE

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) April 21, 2026

He called the data being used to judge inflation “quite imperfect," and that he is most interested in the underlying inflation rate.

Warsh confirmed President Trump “never once asked me to commit to any particular interest rate decision.”

Sen. Kennedy: "Have you agreed with the president that you're going to lower interest rates?"

Warsh: "The president never asked me to predetermine, commit, fix, decide on any interest rate decision in any of our discussions, nor would I ever agree to do so." pic.twitter.com/FYxVkJiGdk

— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) April 21, 2026

Meanwhile, - as he's threatened to do for months, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) announced he will block Warsh’s nomination until the DOJ drops its investigation into Chair Powell, tying the committee vote.

Thom Tillis, Republican Senator from North Carolina, reiterated that he will block the nomination of Kevin Warsh to be chair of the Federal Reserve until the "bogus investigation" into the Fed and Chair Powell is completed. Speaking at Warsh’s nomination hearing before the Senate Banking Committee, Tillis said he was going to talk about “what’s preventing me from being in a position to vote for you until” the probe is wrapped up rather than ask questions, as he believes Warsh has “extraordinary” and “impeccable” credentials for the job. There are 13 Republicans on the committee and 11 Democrats, so Tillis’ refusal to approve ties the committee 12-12 and the nomination cannot move to the Senate approval for confirmation. Given President Trump's comments earlier about the need to pursue the investigation, this standoff is going nowhere. "Let's get rid of this investigation so I can support your confirmation", Tillis said. -Bloomberg

Thom Tillis still refuses to blame Trump for anything: "The problem I have is that some US attorney or assistant US attorney with a dream thought it would be cute to bring Chair Powell under an investigation ... the boss said he didn't know anything about it" pic.twitter.com/WhBawG82bZ

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 21, 2026

Lookin' like a June confirmation...

* * *

President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Federal Reserve, Kevin Warsh, is scheduled to appear before the Senate Banking Committee today at 10:00 a.m. ET for his confirmation hearing - his first public test in the high-stakes process to become the next chair of the central bank.

The hearing, set to take place in the Dirksen Senate Office Building Room 538 in a hybrid open session, comes less than a month before current Chair Jerome Powell’s term expires on May 15. Warsh, a former Fed governor who served from 2006 to 2011, was nominated by Trump on March 4 to serve as both a Board member and chairman.

Watch Live:

Warsh, a former Fed governor who has spent years criticizing the institution as directionless and in need of “regime change," now has the chance to outline his vision for remaking the world’s most powerful central bank. But he faces a delicate balancing act: signaling loyalty to Trump’s push for lower interest rates while reassuring markets, lawmakers, and global observers that he will safeguard the Fed’s independence and keep inflation in check.

In prepared opening remarks released yesterday, Warsh strikes a deliberate tone on the politically sensitive issue of central bank independence. He plans to state that “monetary policy independence is essential” and that decisions must rest on “analytic rigor, meaningful deliberation and unclouded decision-making.” At the same time, he will argue that the Fed has sometimes “extended its reach” beyond its core mandate, eroding its credibility, and that presidents or lawmakers expressing views on interest rates does not inherently undermine operational independence.

He also declares that “inflation is a choice” and that the Fed must take responsibility for price stability while staying firmly “in its lane” - avoiding fiscal, regulatory, or social policy areas where it lacks authority or expertise.

As anticipated, Senate Democrats are preparing to aggressively question Warsh, focusing on whether he can truly insulate the Fed from political pressure - especially given Trump’s repeated calls for sharply lower interest rates. Ranking Member Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and other Democrats have signaled they will press him on potential conflicts of interest, the adequacy of his financial disclosures (which revealed more than $100 million in assets but left some holdings opaque), plans to divest certain investments, and any private communications with the Trump administration.

All 11 Democrats on the committee are widely expected to oppose the nomination. Some had pushed to delay the hearing pending the outcome of Justice Department investigations involving Powell and Governor Lisa Cook, but those efforts did not succeed.

On the Republican side, support for Warsh appears solid, though not unanimous. A handful of GOP senators have voiced reservations linked to the ongoing probes, but the party holds the majority and is positioned to advance the nomination out of committee.

Markets and policymakers will be watching closely for any signals on Warsh’s views regarding the Fed’s balance sheet, the pace of potential rate cuts, and his overall approach to the dual mandate. Analysts describe him as pragmatic rather than a radical departure from current policy, but today’s testimony could shift expectations ahead of the next FOMC meeting.

According to Goldman, here's what to watch for:

• On Econ (Mericle): i) How has the war affected his views – Has he shifted toward the FOMC’s wait-and-see approach, which might signal an intention to work toward building consensus? Ii) Does he talk about looking through tariff + energy passthrough? How will Warsh characterize where inflation stands + how the FOMC should treat tariff and oil effects? Iii) What does he say about shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet? Are incremental reductions related to regulatory + supervisory changes enough or is he still pushing for a more substantial reduction?
   
• Tillis block (Pastrick): Senator Tillis key to watch: No expectation that he will oppose Warsh as a candidate but we do NOT expect to see any openings from Tillis that outline a new position on not supporting the nomination while Fed Chair Powell is under legal scrutiny.
   
• On Rates markets (Marshall): i) Insight into where Warsh anchors his longer-run views could impact the distribution of risks around terminal rate pricing; ii) That Warsh supports a smaller balance sheet would come as no surprise, but details around how he might seek to achieve it, and what potential Fed/Treasury interaction might look like, would shape market perceptions on balance sheet trajectory; iii) Bank regulation: Emphasis on things like adjustments to the liquidity rules + internal liquidity stress testing could reinforce the case that meaningful shifts in policy follow a shift in reserve demand (rather than result from efforts to shift the reserve framework)

The confirmation process remains fluid. A committee vote would follow today’s hearing, with the full Senate expected to take up the nomination soon after. Warsh’s performance - particularly how he navigates questions on Fed independence amid White House expectations - will be pivotal in determining whether he assumes the role by mid-May.